This article is from 'guardian', was first published or seen on Thu Feb 07 14:02:38 UTC 2008 and has 5 versions.

It has 0 recommendations - Recommend this revision.

« Previous version Next version »

Version 2 Version 3

Archbishop backs sharia law for British Muslims | The Guardian |

Thu Feb 07 14:50:49 UTC 2008

Archbishop backs sharia law for British Muslims | The Guardian |

Thu Feb 07 17:31:29 UTC 2008
The Archbishop of Canterbury sparked controversy today when he said the introduction of sharia law for British Muslims was "unavoidable". The Archbishop of Canterbury prompted controversy today when he said the introduction of sharia law for British Muslims was "unavoidable".
Rowan Williams told BBC Radio 4's World at One that Muslims should be able to choose whether to have matters such as marital disputes dealt with under sharia law or the British legal system.Rowan Williams told BBC Radio 4's World at One that Muslims should be able to choose whether to have matters such as marital disputes dealt with under sharia law or the British legal system.
His comments were strongly criticised by the National Secular Society but welcomed by the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), which stressed it did not back the introduction of sharia criminal law.The spokesman of the prime minister, Gordon Brown, insisted British law must remain pre-eminent, but said concessions to sharia law could be made on a case-by-case basis.
Article continues Willams said giving sharia official status in the UK would help maintain social cohesion because some Muslims do not relate to the British legal system. Article continues He said: "In general terms, if there are specific instances that can be looked at on a case-by-case basis that is something we can look at.
Its introduction would mean Muslims would no longer have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". "But the prime minister believes British law should apply in this country, based on British values."
Williams said his proposal would only work if sharia law was properly understood, rather than seen through the eyes of biased media reports. The archbishop's comments were strongly criticised by the National Secular Society but welcomed by the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), which stressed it did not back the introduction of sharia criminal law.
The archbishop said he was not proposing the adoption of extreme interpretations of sharia law practiced in some repressive regimes. Willams said giving sharia official status in the UK would help maintain social cohesion because some Muslims do not relate to the British legal system.
Its introduction would mean Muslims would no longer have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty".
Williams said his proposal would only work if sharia law was properly understood, rather than seen through the eyes of biased media reports.
The archbishop said he was not proposing the adoption of extreme interpretations of sharia law practiced in some repressive regimes.
He said: "It seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.He said: "It seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.
"We already have in this country a number of situations in which the internal law of religious communities is recognised by the law of the land as justifying conscientious objections in certain circumstances. There is a place for finding what would be a constructive accommodation with some aspects of Muslim law as we already do with aspects of other kinds of religious law.""We already have in this country a number of situations in which the internal law of religious communities is recognised by the law of the land as justifying conscientious objections in certain circumstances. There is a place for finding what would be a constructive accommodation with some aspects of Muslim law as we already do with aspects of other kinds of religious law."
Williams went on: "It would be quite wrong to say that we could ever license a system of law for some community which gave people no right of appeal, no way of exercising the rights that are guaranteed to them as citizens in general. Williams went on: "It would be quite wrong to say that we could ever license a system of law for some community which gave people no right of appeal, no way of exercising the rights that are guaranteed to them as citizens in general. "But there are ways of looking at marital disputes, for example, which provide an alternative to the divorce courts as we understand them. In some cultural and religious settings they would seem more appropriate."
"But there are ways of looking at marital disputes, for example, which provide an alternative to the divorce courts as we understand them. In some cultural and religious settings they would seem more appropriate."
A spokesman for the MCB said many UK Muslims already used sharia law in aspects of their day-to-day lives, such as banking and marriage, and the same principle of separate laws could "easily be accepted for other faiths groups".A spokesman for the MCB said many UK Muslims already used sharia law in aspects of their day-to-day lives, such as banking and marriage, and the same principle of separate laws could "easily be accepted for other faiths groups".
He said introducing sharia law for marriages would combat the problem of forced marriage because Islam required the consent of both parties.He said introducing sharia law for marriages would combat the problem of forced marriage because Islam required the consent of both parties. The National Secular Society said it was another example of Britain "sleepwalking to segregation".
The National Secular Society said it was another example of Britain "sleepwalking to segregation"."Our view is simple. You can't have a country where you have separate laws for separate faith groups," it said. "The same religious groups who are calling for integration are the same one who want segregation."
"Our view is simple. You can't have a country where you have separate laws for separate faith groups," it said. "The same religious groups who are calling for integration are the same one who want segregation." Brown's spokesman said one example where legal concessions could be made were changes to the regulation around stamp duty to include sharia-compliant mortgages.
These mortgages involve two transfers of property, so in theory stamp duty would be payable twice - but is in fact paid only once.
He said: "Our general position is that sharia law cannot be used as a justification for committing breaches of English law, nor should the principles of sharia law be included in a civil court for resolving contractual disputes.
"If there are specific instances like stamp duty, where changes can be made in a way that's consistent with British law and British values, in a way to accommodate the values of fundamental Muslims, that is something the government would look at."