This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/06/department-tells-parents-dental-scheme-is-ending-but-legislation-has-not-passed
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Department tells parents dental scheme is ending – but legislation has not passed | Department tells parents dental scheme is ending – but legislation has not passed |
(4 months later) | |
The health department has published information claiming children will no longer be eligible for a $2.7bn dental program from 1 July, despite the government not having legislated the cut yet. | The health department has published information claiming children will no longer be eligible for a $2.7bn dental program from 1 July, despite the government not having legislated the cut yet. |
In April, the government replaced the $2.7bn child dental benefits schedule with a program for adults and children, which the budget shows is worth $1.7bn over the next four years. | In April, the government replaced the $2.7bn child dental benefits schedule with a program for adults and children, which the budget shows is worth $1.7bn over the next four years. |
A fact sheet on the health department’s website tells parents their children will no longer be able to access the old scheme from 1 July “if the parliament agrees”. | A fact sheet on the health department’s website tells parents their children will no longer be able to access the old scheme from 1 July “if the parliament agrees”. |
In answer to a second frequently asked question, the sheet said: “The child dental benefits schedule will close to all patients from 1 July 2016. This means that you will not be able to access the [scheme] on or after this date. The cost of any dental services provided on or after this date will need to be met by you.” | In answer to a second frequently asked question, the sheet said: “The child dental benefits schedule will close to all patients from 1 July 2016. This means that you will not be able to access the [scheme] on or after this date. The cost of any dental services provided on or after this date will need to be met by you.” |
In estimates health officials said it was a statement of the government’s intent and the presumption was the scheme would close from 1 July. | In estimates health officials said it was a statement of the government’s intent and the presumption was the scheme would close from 1 July. |
The Greens leader, Richard Di Natale, said children had an entitlement to the scheme until legislation was passed and that would not be possible because parliament would be dissolved. | The Greens leader, Richard Di Natale, said children had an entitlement to the scheme until legislation was passed and that would not be possible because parliament would be dissolved. |
“It’s beyond the pale the department would be advising people they can’t access a service they’re entitled to.” | “It’s beyond the pale the department would be advising people they can’t access a service they’re entitled to.” |
Di Natale suggested the advice was particularly perverse because the government had justified changes to dental health on the basis the old scheme was under-utilised. | Di Natale suggested the advice was particularly perverse because the government had justified changes to dental health on the basis the old scheme was under-utilised. |
The health department secretary, Martin Bowles, said if the abolition of the old scheme wasn’t legislated the department would adjust its advice. | The health department secretary, Martin Bowles, said if the abolition of the old scheme wasn’t legislated the department would adjust its advice. |
Bowles said the statement that children would not be eligible had to be read in context of the statement abolition of the scheme required parliament’s agreement. | Bowles said the statement that children would not be eligible had to be read in context of the statement abolition of the scheme required parliament’s agreement. |
The minister for rural health, Fiona Nash, said the advice was correct when it was written and would be reassessed when parliament was dissolved. | The minister for rural health, Fiona Nash, said the advice was correct when it was written and would be reassessed when parliament was dissolved. |
The opposition health spokeswoman, Catherine King, said the Turnbull government had “been caught out lying to parents” about the scheme. | The opposition health spokeswoman, Catherine King, said the Turnbull government had “been caught out lying to parents” about the scheme. |
“Health department officials [on Friday] confirmed in Senate estimates that the [old scheme] could only be abolished through legislation and that this legislation has not yet passed parliament,” she said. | “Health department officials [on Friday] confirmed in Senate estimates that the [old scheme] could only be abolished through legislation and that this legislation has not yet passed parliament,” she said. |
King said given parliament would be dissolved this weekend, Labor’s scheme could not now be abolished before 1 July and parents would be able to access the scheme at least until the new parliament sat later this year. | King said given parliament would be dissolved this weekend, Labor’s scheme could not now be abolished before 1 July and parents would be able to access the scheme at least until the new parliament sat later this year. |
King said the government’s new dental scheme only provided funding for 600,000 children and adults, 400,000 fewer places than the 1 million children treated under Labor’s scheme. | King said the government’s new dental scheme only provided funding for 600,000 children and adults, 400,000 fewer places than the 1 million children treated under Labor’s scheme. |
The health minister, Sussan Ley, said the government had already introduced legislation for its new scheme before the 1 July start date and parliament remained in session. | The health minister, Sussan Ley, said the government had already introduced legislation for its new scheme before the 1 July start date and parliament remained in session. |
“This is the dental scheme that Labor should have introduced, giving full, affordable protection to all children and low-income adults if they need it,” she said. | “This is the dental scheme that Labor should have introduced, giving full, affordable protection to all children and low-income adults if they need it,” she said. |
Ley said Labor’s dental plan would remain open until 1 July and “if contingencies were required, they would be addressed when the need arose”. | Ley said Labor’s dental plan would remain open until 1 July and “if contingencies were required, they would be addressed when the need arose”. |
“Labor should be careful throwing stones, given Bill Shorten avoided any mention of their failed child dental scheme in his budget reply,” she said. | “Labor should be careful throwing stones, given Bill Shorten avoided any mention of their failed child dental scheme in his budget reply,” she said. |
Previous version
1
Next version