This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/13/french-court-refuses-to-release-woman-pardoned-for-killing-her-abusive-husband

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
French court refuses to release woman pardoned for killing her abusive husband French court refuses to release woman pardoned for killing her abusive husband
(10 days later)
A French court has refused to release a woman pardoned for killing her abusive husband, prompting an outcry over a case that has become a cause célèbre.A French court has refused to release a woman pardoned for killing her abusive husband, prompting an outcry over a case that has become a cause célèbre.
Jacqueline Sauvage received a pardon from president François Hollande in January for the 2012 killing of her husband Norbert Marot, a violent alcoholic who she said raped her and her daughters.Jacqueline Sauvage received a pardon from president François Hollande in January for the 2012 killing of her husband Norbert Marot, a violent alcoholic who she said raped her and her daughters.
Related: French president pardons Jacqueline Sauvage over killing of violent husband
She was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2014 for the murder of her husband who she shot three times in the back a day after their son hanged himself.She was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2014 for the murder of her husband who she shot three times in the back a day after their son hanged himself.
More than 400,000 people signed a petition demanding the release of Sauvage, 68, who has become a symbol of the suffering of domestic abuse victims in France.More than 400,000 people signed a petition demanding the release of Sauvage, 68, who has become a symbol of the suffering of domestic abuse victims in France.
On Friday, Sauvage’s lawyers Nathalie Tomasini and Janine Bonaggiunta declared themselves “in shock” after a court in Melun, south of Paris, refused to grant her conditional bail.On Friday, Sauvage’s lawyers Nathalie Tomasini and Janine Bonaggiunta declared themselves “in shock” after a court in Melun, south of Paris, refused to grant her conditional bail.
At a news conference, they accused magistrates of refusing to release Sauvage because “the presidential pardon was highly resented by the whole profession”.At a news conference, they accused magistrates of refusing to release Sauvage because “the presidential pardon was highly resented by the whole profession”.
In its ruling the court referenced the “extensive media coverage” of the case in its decision.In its ruling the court referenced the “extensive media coverage” of the case in its decision.
The prosecution service, which backed the release of Sauvage, will appeal the court’s decision, Melun prosecutor Beatrice Angelelli told AFP.The prosecution service, which backed the release of Sauvage, will appeal the court’s decision, Melun prosecutor Beatrice Angelelli told AFP.
Sauvage’s lawyers told AFP that the court in its decision had expressed concern that her return to her old neighbourhood might encourage people to see her as a victim rather than a convict “given the support around her and the media coverage”.Sauvage’s lawyers told AFP that the court in its decision had expressed concern that her return to her old neighbourhood might encourage people to see her as a victim rather than a convict “given the support around her and the media coverage”.
The court’s decision not to release her prompted an outpouring of criticism, with Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo describing it “incomprehensible”.The court’s decision not to release her prompted an outpouring of criticism, with Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo describing it “incomprehensible”.
Several feminist groups also expressed outrage, denouncing the ruling as “patriarchal” and a rebuke for women living with domestic violence.Several feminist groups also expressed outrage, denouncing the ruling as “patriarchal” and a rebuke for women living with domestic violence.