This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/25/parents-of-wa-boy-with-cancer-return-to-court-after-doctors-seek-to-force-radiotherapy

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Parents of WA boy with cancer return to court after doctors seek to force radiotherapy Parents of WA boy with cancer return to court after doctors seek to force radiotherapy Parents of WA boy with cancer return to court after doctors seek to force radiotherapy
(35 minutes later)
The parents of a six-year-old Perth boy with cancer have returned to court to battle doctors over their child’s treatment, arguing he should be given palliative care so he can die with dignity.The parents of a six-year-old Perth boy with cancer have returned to court to battle doctors over their child’s treatment, arguing he should be given palliative care so he can die with dignity.
Oshin Kiszko was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumour last year. His parents, Angela Kiszko and Adrian Strachan, opposed the treatment recommended by doctors at Princess Margaret hospital in Western Australia due to the severe side effects.Oshin Kiszko was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumour last year. His parents, Angela Kiszko and Adrian Strachan, opposed the treatment recommended by doctors at Princess Margaret hospital in Western Australia due to the severe side effects.
A court order in March forced Oshin to receive chemotherapy and he was given two cycles of the treatment.A court order in March forced Oshin to receive chemotherapy and he was given two cycles of the treatment.
Family court chief justice Stephen Thackray then considered whether Oshin should also be given radiotherapy and handed down his judgment in May, saying the parents had given an undertaking to continue chemotherapy instead.Family court chief justice Stephen Thackray then considered whether Oshin should also be given radiotherapy and handed down his judgment in May, saying the parents had given an undertaking to continue chemotherapy instead.
The case was back in court on Thursday after both sides agreed there was no longer any benefit to continuing chemotherapy alone.The case was back in court on Thursday after both sides agreed there was no longer any benefit to continuing chemotherapy alone.
The hospital has made an application to the court to force Oshin to have further medical treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy.The hospital has made an application to the court to force Oshin to have further medical treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Lawyer for the hospital, Carol Conley, told the court Oshin’s latest MRI indicated an ongoing positive response to chemotherapy and said treatment would usually stop only when a patient stopped responding.Lawyer for the hospital, Carol Conley, told the court Oshin’s latest MRI indicated an ongoing positive response to chemotherapy and said treatment would usually stop only when a patient stopped responding.
“The applicant wants to give Oshin a chance at life,” she said.“The applicant wants to give Oshin a chance at life,” she said.
Oshin’s parents want him to have palliative care and say it is within the scope of their parental responsibility to decide that is the appropriate course of action.Oshin’s parents want him to have palliative care and say it is within the scope of their parental responsibility to decide that is the appropriate course of action.
A lawyer for the family, Jun Khew Wong, said it was not a medical issue, but rather an ethical and moral decision.A lawyer for the family, Jun Khew Wong, said it was not a medical issue, but rather an ethical and moral decision.
He said even though Oshin was responding to the chemotherapy treatment, his chance of survival had not increased.He said even though Oshin was responding to the chemotherapy treatment, his chance of survival had not increased.
“Oshin does have the right to die with dignity,” he said.“Oshin does have the right to die with dignity,” he said.
An independent lawyer representing Oshin, Robin Cohen, agreed it was in his best interests to receive palliative care.An independent lawyer representing Oshin, Robin Cohen, agreed it was in his best interests to receive palliative care.
Justice Richard O’Brien has reserved his decision until next week.Justice Richard O’Brien has reserved his decision until next week.