This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-42362524

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Church apology over Bishop George Bell abuse inquiry Church apology over Bishop George Bell abuse inquiry
(about 4 hours later)
The Church of England has apologised to the relatives of a bishop for the way it investigated child abuse claims made against him decades after his death.The Church of England has apologised to the relatives of a bishop for the way it investigated child abuse claims made against him decades after his death.
Former Bishop of Chichester George Bell, who died in 1958, was alleged to have repeatedly abused a young girl.Former Bishop of Chichester George Bell, who died in 1958, was alleged to have repeatedly abused a young girl.
She made a formal complaint in 1995 and, 10 years later, won an apology and compensation from the Church.She made a formal complaint in 1995 and, 10 years later, won an apology and compensation from the Church.
A report into the handling of the case due to be published later is expected to be critical of the Church's actions. A report into the handling of the case has criticised the Church's actions and described its process as "deficient".
Ahead of the publication of Lord Carlile's report, the current Bishop of Chichester the Right Reverend Martin Warner praised the "dignity and integrity" of Bishop Bell's accuser, but said the Church inquiry paid "inadequate attention to the rights of those who are dead".Ahead of the publication of Lord Carlile's report, the current Bishop of Chichester the Right Reverend Martin Warner praised the "dignity and integrity" of Bishop Bell's accuser, but said the Church inquiry paid "inadequate attention to the rights of those who are dead".
The allegations against George Bell were first made by the victim, known as "Carol", in 1995, but were not investigated or referred to the police.The allegations against George Bell were first made by the victim, known as "Carol", in 1995, but were not investigated or referred to the police.
She said the bishop began abusing her when she was five and molested her in Chichester Cathedral as she sat listening to stories.She said the bishop began abusing her when she was five and molested her in Chichester Cathedral as she sat listening to stories.
Carol said the abuse continued for about four years.Carol said the abuse continued for about four years.
In 2013 she wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, at which point the matter was referred to the police. In 2013, she wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, at which point the matter was referred to police.
Two years later the Church paid £16,800 in an out of court settlement and apologised to Carol.Two years later the Church paid £16,800 in an out of court settlement and apologised to Carol.
However, the "George Bell Group" of supporters of the former bishop sought and gained a review into how the Church arrived at that decision.However, the "George Bell Group" of supporters of the former bishop sought and gained a review into how the Church arrived at that decision.
Lord Carlile will publish the review's findings at 10:30 GMT on Friday. 'Rights of the bishop'
Lord Carlile criticised the Church response as "deficient" in a number of respects and said the most significant was that "it failed to follow a process that was fair and equitable to both sides".
He said the Church should be ready to acknowledge sexual abuse committed by the clergy - but that did not mean the reputations of the dead were without value.
The independent reviewer said even when alleged perpetrators had died there should be methodical and sufficient investigations.
He said in this case it was "clear that the Crown Prosecution Service evidential charging standard... would not have been met".
Making 15 recommendations, Lord Carlile said he concluded the Church failed to follow a procedure which respected the rights of both sides - and, feeling it should be supportive of the complainant and transparent in its dealings, had failed to engage in a process that gave proper consideration to the rights of the bishop.
'Principle of innocence''Principle of innocence'
In a statement issued on Thursday evening, Bishop Warner said: "We welcome Lord Carlile's assessment of our processes, and apologise for failures in the work of the Core Group of national and diocesan officers and its inadequate attention to the rights of those who are dead.In a statement issued on Thursday evening, Bishop Warner said: "We welcome Lord Carlile's assessment of our processes, and apologise for failures in the work of the Core Group of national and diocesan officers and its inadequate attention to the rights of those who are dead.
"The emotive principle of innocent until proven guilty is a standard by which our actions are judged and we have to ensure as best we can that justice is seen to be done."The emotive principle of innocent until proven guilty is a standard by which our actions are judged and we have to ensure as best we can that justice is seen to be done.
"Irrespective of whether she is technically a complainant, survivor, or victim, 'Carol' emerges from this report as a person of dignity and integrity."Irrespective of whether she is technically a complainant, survivor, or victim, 'Carol' emerges from this report as a person of dignity and integrity.
"It is essential that her right to privacy continues to be fully respected.""It is essential that her right to privacy continues to be fully respected."
The Church also repeated its apology for failing to report Carol's allegations to the police when she first came forward in 1995.The Church also repeated its apology for failing to report Carol's allegations to the police when she first came forward in 1995.