This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/29/mps-could-lose-seats-in-new-sexual-harassment-sanctions-say-sources

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
MPs could lose seats in new sexual harassment sanctions, say sources MPs could lose seats in new sexual harassment sanctions, say sources
(11 days later)
Proposals to tackle bullying and harassment at Westminster are ‘serious and heavyweight’
Nicola Slawson and
Jessica Elgot
Mon 29 Jan 2018 20.20 GMT
Last modified on Mon 29 Jan 2018 20.24 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
MPs could lose their seats if found to have engaged in sexual harassment or bullying under proposed new guidelines, the Guardian understands.MPs could lose their seats if found to have engaged in sexual harassment or bullying under proposed new guidelines, the Guardian understands.
The proposed sanctions, put together by a cross-party working group set up to formulate a new process for sexual harassment complaints, include the parliamentary commissioner for standards being granted powers to suspend MPs, which could lead to recall – a process whereby MPs can lose their seat.The proposed sanctions, put together by a cross-party working group set up to formulate a new process for sexual harassment complaints, include the parliamentary commissioner for standards being granted powers to suspend MPs, which could lead to recall – a process whereby MPs can lose their seat.
Sources close to the working group said the recommendations would be “serious and heavyweight”.Sources close to the working group said the recommendations would be “serious and heavyweight”.
The group, chaired by the leader of the House of Commons, Andrea Leadsom, was set up after a string of MPs from across the political spectrum were suspended or placed under investigation in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal. It spent six weeks hearing evidence from experts and parliamentary staff.The group, chaired by the leader of the House of Commons, Andrea Leadsom, was set up after a string of MPs from across the political spectrum were suspended or placed under investigation in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal. It spent six weeks hearing evidence from experts and parliamentary staff.
After the expenses scandal in 2009, an independent process was set up which could ultimately kickstart the recall process for the worst offenders. MPs on the working group are understood to have pointed out the disparity of a system whereby MPs can lose their seats for expenses fraud, but not sexual harassment.After the expenses scandal in 2009, an independent process was set up which could ultimately kickstart the recall process for the worst offenders. MPs on the working group are understood to have pointed out the disparity of a system whereby MPs can lose their seats for expenses fraud, but not sexual harassment.
Sources stressed the imposition of sanctions would depend on the details of individual cases, with a range of punishments proportionate to the offence which could include bullying.Sources stressed the imposition of sanctions would depend on the details of individual cases, with a range of punishments proportionate to the offence which could include bullying.
Staff who have spoken to the committee have underlined issues with bullying, which many have emphasised is an even more widespread issue in Westminster.Staff who have spoken to the committee have underlined issues with bullying, which many have emphasised is an even more widespread issue in Westminster.
The proposed sanctions represent a significant beefing-up of the proposals after an earlier version, leaked at the start of the year, was criticised by campaigners and MPs who said the guidelines were “too vague”.The proposed sanctions represent a significant beefing-up of the proposals after an earlier version, leaked at the start of the year, was criticised by campaigners and MPs who said the guidelines were “too vague”.
The publication of the final report was originally due before Christmas but was delayed as the working group has not yet agreed to its findings, with reports suggesting the Labour party has been unwilling to sign up to certain elements.The publication of the final report was originally due before Christmas but was delayed as the working group has not yet agreed to its findings, with reports suggesting the Labour party has been unwilling to sign up to certain elements.
At the time the Labour MP, Jess Phillips, who sits on the group, said unless there were firm sanctions in place the guidelines were meaningless.At the time the Labour MP, Jess Phillips, who sits on the group, said unless there were firm sanctions in place the guidelines were meaningless.
“We need them to be serious. And ultimately there has to be a method of recall in order to sack MPs,” she said.“We need them to be serious. And ultimately there has to be a method of recall in order to sack MPs,” she said.
According to the Financial Times, which has seen the leaked proposals, the guidelines state: “Sanctions range from apologies, behaviour agreements and additional compulsory training, to suspension from the house [leading to recall], dismissal or loss of parliamentary pass [as appropriate depending on who it was].”According to the Financial Times, which has seen the leaked proposals, the guidelines state: “Sanctions range from apologies, behaviour agreements and additional compulsory training, to suspension from the house [leading to recall], dismissal or loss of parliamentary pass [as appropriate depending on who it was].”
The final plans are expected to be published in early February and will be voted on in both the Commons and the Lords shortly after.The final plans are expected to be published in early February and will be voted on in both the Commons and the Lords shortly after.
Sexual harassmentSexual harassment
BullyingBullying
House of CommonsHouse of Commons
Harvey WeinsteinHarvey Weinstein
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content