This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/liam-allen-met-police-rape-accusation-false-evidence-disclosure-arrest-mistake-banned-university-a8184916.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Liam Allan: Met Police apologise to 22-year-old man falsely accused of rape after failing to disclose crucial text messages | |
(35 minutes later) | |
The Metropolitan Police and the Crown Prosecution Service have apologised to Liam Allan after a rape case against him collapsed following the discovery of crucial text message evidence that had not been disclosed to his legal team. | |
The 22-year-old was cleared after lawyers were handed a mobile phone download containing previously undisclosed text messages which cast doubt on the claim the sex was non-consensual. | |
Although the CPS had submitted a short text conversation between Mr Allan and the complainant as evidence, they had not provided the whole download from the alleged victim’s phone until days before the trial collapsed. | |
A judge threw out the charges against Mr Allan after his lawyer discovered messages showing the claimant wanted and enjoyed the sex which she later claimed was non-consensual. | |
The joint-review said: “There is no evidence that the phone download was withheld deliberately by the OIC (officer in the case) or CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) prosecutors. | The joint-review said: “There is no evidence that the phone download was withheld deliberately by the OIC (officer in the case) or CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) prosecutors. |
“The disclosure problems in this case were caused by a combination of error, lack of challenge, and lack of knowledge.” | “The disclosure problems in this case were caused by a combination of error, lack of challenge, and lack of knowledge.” |
Commander Richard Smith said he and Claire Lindley, Chief Crown Prosecutor for London South, met with Mr Allan “where he received a personal apology from us both.” | |
He said he was “really pleased to have that opportunity to meet with him face-to-face, allow him to read the report and apologise for the errors that were made.” | |
The officer in the case admitted he was mistaken in his belief he had looked through an entire download of more than 57,000 messages in the alleged victim’s phone. | |
Ms Lindley said: “This is not about resources. This is about a mistake being made by an officer and a lack of check and challenge by the prosecutor involved.” | |
Mr Smith added: “The amount of cases he was investigating at the time, he feels, was a contributing factor to the mistake he made, compounded by the lack of recording and mistakes in the system.” | |
Last week, the CPS announced it was reviewing all live rape and sexual offence cases after a string of defendants facing such allegations had the charges against them dropped when critical evidence emerged at the last minute. | |
Mr Smith confirmed the Metropolitan Police is reviewing 600 cases of rape and sexual assault. | |
Thousands more are under review nationally, the CPS said. | |
Mr Smith said: “We have moved in 120 officers to assist with the review of the 600 cases we have which are post-charge at the moment.” | |
Ms Lindley said: “The 600 cases live in the system presently are still being reviewed. That process has not yet finished.” | |
“During the review some cases have given cause for concern. Some cases are discontinued in the normal course of events.” | |
Although she could not give a figure on how many cases are involved in a national review of all rape cases, she said: “There must be thousands”. | |
Additional reporting by PA |