This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-joint-investigation-salisbury-spy-poisoning-rejected-a8289056.html
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Russian bid for joint investigation into Salisbury spy poisoning rejected by chemical weapons watchdog | Russian bid for joint investigation into Salisbury spy poisoning rejected by chemical weapons watchdog |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Russia’s proposal of a joint investigation into the Salisbury nerve agent attack has been voted down by members of the international chemical weapons watchdog. | Russia’s proposal of a joint investigation into the Salisbury nerve agent attack has been voted down by members of the international chemical weapons watchdog. |
| The Kremlin complained it had been “pushed aside” after the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) rejected Moscow’s call to be included in a probe into the poisoning of ex-spy Sergei Skripal. | The Kremlin complained it had been “pushed aside” after the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) rejected Moscow’s call to be included in a probe into the poisoning of ex-spy Sergei Skripal. |
| Britain had called the Russian proposal “perverse” and “a diversionary tactic”. | Britain had called the Russian proposal “perverse” and “a diversionary tactic”. |
| Russia put forward the joint investigation as the UK did not invite it to participate in a probe being carried out by the OPCW, the results of which are expected next week. | Russia put forward the joint investigation as the UK did not invite it to participate in a probe being carried out by the OPCW, the results of which are expected next week. |
| Moscow’s motion was defeated 15 votes to six, with 17 members states abstaining. | Moscow’s motion was defeated 15 votes to six, with 17 members states abstaining. |
| China, Azerbaijan, Sudan, Algeria and Iran backed the Russia, which tabled the proposal during an extraordinary session of the OPCW executive committee in The Hague. | China, Azerbaijan, Sudan, Algeria and Iran backed the Russia, which tabled the proposal during an extraordinary session of the OPCW executive committee in The Hague. |
| British foreign secretary Boris Johnson welcomed the outcome of the meeting, which the UK government said had been called by Russia in a bid to “confuse and frustrate this process”. | British foreign secretary Boris Johnson welcomed the outcome of the meeting, which the UK government said had been called by Russia in a bid to “confuse and frustrate this process”. |
| “Russia has had one goal in mind since the attempted murders on UK soil through the use of a military-grade chemical weapon: to obscure the truth and confuse the public,” he said. | “Russia has had one goal in mind since the attempted murders on UK soil through the use of a military-grade chemical weapon: to obscure the truth and confuse the public,” he said. |
| “The international community has yet again seen through these tactics and robustly defeated Russia’s attempts today to derail the proper international process.” | “The international community has yet again seen through these tactics and robustly defeated Russia’s attempts today to derail the proper international process.” |
| Russia’s envoy to the OPCW claimed Britain’s work with the watchdog over the poisoning had not been transparent. | Russia’s envoy to the OPCW claimed Britain’s work with the watchdog over the poisoning had not been transparent. |
| Alexander Shulgin added: “Russia as well as other states that are members of the executive committee have been pushed aside from this investigation.” | Alexander Shulgin added: “Russia as well as other states that are members of the executive committee have been pushed aside from this investigation.” |
| “They tell us that they can inform us of the results of this investigation... only with the good will of Great Britain. | “They tell us that they can inform us of the results of this investigation... only with the good will of Great Britain. |
| “But, knowing how our so-called partners have conducted themselves, we are not going to count on their good will.” | “But, knowing how our so-called partners have conducted themselves, we are not going to count on their good will.” |
| The Kremlin denies any involvement in the 4 March attack which left Mr Skripal and his daughter Yulia fighting for their lives. The UK insists Russia was behind the assassination attempt and says there is “no plausible alternative explanation”. | The Kremlin denies any involvement in the 4 March attack which left Mr Skripal and his daughter Yulia fighting for their lives. The UK insists Russia was behind the assassination attempt and says there is “no plausible alternative explanation”. |
| Moscow has seized upon the revelation that scientists at the Ministry of Defence’s research laboratory were unable to pinpoint “the precise source” of the Soviet-style novichok nerve agent used in the attack. | |
| “Have you no shame, Theresa?” thundered headlines on the country’s main news network on Wednesday morning, calling on the British Prime Minister to resign unless she could prove Russia’s involvement. | |
| Throughout the day, state news interspersed PMQ interventions by the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn with gleeful comments by Vladimir Putin, who was speaking about the attack for only the second time. | |
| “The speed of the anti-Russian campaign has been bewildering,” said President Putin. “Scotland Yard had declared they needed no less than two months for a full investigation.” | |
| Few Russian media outlets reported the full comments of the chief executive of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down, who said the novichok was created with “extremely sophisticated methods... only in the capabilities of a state actor. | |
| “We have not identified the precise source, but we have provided the scientific info to the government who have then used a number of other sources to piece together the conclusions,” added Gary Aitkenhead. | |
| The UK government said the work of Porton Down scientists was “only one part of the intelligence picture”. | |
| But Mr Aitkenhead’s comments were all-too-easily exploited and placed Britain under pressure to reveal more details of its intelligence on the Salisbury poisoning. Labour’s shadow home secretary Diane Abbott accused Mr Johnson of misleading the public when he said Porton Down scientists had confirmed the source of the novichok. | |
| The government has stood by its conclusions on the nerve agent’s origin, but the Foreign Office on Wednesday deleted a tweet from last month saying Porton Down scientists had identified the substance as “made in Russia”. | |
| The head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service Sergei Naryshkin described the Skripal case as a “grotesque provocation” by American and British spy agencies. He went on to compare the current confrontation to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, the nearest the Soviet Union and the US came to nuclear war. | |
| “We need to stop raising stakes irresponsibly, and projecting power on to interstate relations to avoid a new crisis,” he said. |