This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/us-gun-concealed-carry-permits-parkland-school-shooting-control-a8289156.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US interest in concealed carry permits jumps 200 per cent after Parkland: ‘We’ve never seen a spike this big before’ US interest in concealed carry permit training jumps 100 per cent after Parkland: ‘We’ve never seen a spike this big before’
(about 20 hours later)
The number of Americans interested in getting concealed carry permits in the United States to secretly wield guns in public has jumped dramatically — some states have seen as much as 250 per cent increase — since the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that killed 17 people nearly 50 days ago. The number of Americans interested in obtaining concealed carry permits to secretly bear arms in public has jumped dramatically since the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February – with some states having seen as much as a 250 per cent increase in training requests for this type of permit.
That’s according to companies and networks of firearm instructors that provide training for the permits in dozens of states, one of which says that they have received more requests for the trainings than even after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. In the 50 days since the Parkland, Florida shooting, companies and networks of firearm instructors that provide training for the permits in dozens of states have seen enquiries spike. One company said it had even received more requests for training than after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.
“There’s been a lot of shootings, unfortunately, in this country, but we’ve never seen a spike this big before, even with Newtown,” Chris Schultrop, the CEO and co-founder of the Minnesota-based concealed permit training network National Carry Academy (NCA), told The Independent. “There’s been a lot of shootings, unfortunately, in this country, but we’ve never seen a spike this big before, even with Newtown,” Chris Schultrop, the CEO and co-founder of Minnesota-based concealed permit training network National Carry Academy (NCA), which works across 27 states, told The Independent.
  The intensified interest comes as some Republicans in Washington are leading a push to pass a sweeping national concealed carry law that would force states to recognise all permits issued in the United States. That would mean states that do not allow concealed carry permits would have to allow people to use them. Meanwhile, teenage survivors of the Valentine’s Day Parkland shooting are leading a national movement pushing in the opposite direction; for stricter gun control laws.
That intensified interest comes as Republicans in Washington are leading a push to pass sweeping national concealed carry law that is considered to be a dream bill of the American gun lobby that would force states to recognise all permits issued in the United States — and as teenage survivors of the Valentine’s Day school shooting are pushing in the opposite direction for stricter gun control laws. An analysis by NCA found that it had seen a 103.5 per cent increase in interest in it’s trainings in the month following the Parkland, Florida shooting in February, including a spike of as much as 283 per cent in Ohio.
An analysis by NCA found that they saw a 103.5 per cent increase in interest in their trainings in the month following the Parkland, Florida shooting in February, including a spike of as much as 283 per cent in Ohio. That’s similar to what other networks have experienced, like Concealed Carry Inc, which markets itself as the largest concealed carry training network in the United States and works across 28 states. Jacob Paulsen, a trainer with the network, said that it saw about a 250 per cent increase in interest over concealed carry in Florida alone, and at least a 100 per cent increase in its network as a whole.
That’s similar to what other networks have experienced, like Concealed Carry Inc, which markets itself as the largest concealed carry training network in the United States. Jacob Paulsen, a trainer with the network, said that they saw about a 250 per cent increase in concealed carry in Florida alone, and at least a 100 per cent increase in their network as a whole. Mr Paulsen says the pattern repeats after each mass shooting that captures headlines in America.
Mr Paulsen says the pattern repeats after each mass shooting that captures headlines for days in America. “Why is there an increase after these events? I think people are more proactive about being concerned for their own personal safety,” Mr Paulsen said, noting that unlike the NCA, his organisation saw more interest following the Newtown shooting than the one in Parkland. “I think there’s a concern that the police can never be there fast enough in these situations, and you have to be responsible for your own personal safety.”
“Why is there an increase after these events? I think people are more proactive about being concerned for their own personal safety,” Mr Paulsen said, noting that his organisation saw more interest following the Newtown shooting than the one in Parkland. “I think there’s a concern that the police can never be there fast enough in these situations, and you have to be responsible for your own personal safety.” The argument that Americans need to arm themselves to protect themselves against criminals is nothing new, and gun rights advocates and their sympathisers – including President Donald Trump – have even gone so far as to say that the Parkland shooting would likely have been far less deadly, had teachers been armed when the shooter entered the southern Florida school.
The argument that individuals need to arm themselves to protect themselves against criminals is nothing new in America, and gun rights advocates and their sympathisers — including President Donald Trump — have even gone so far as to say that the Parkland shooting would likely have been far less deadly had teachers, for insthetance, been packing when the 19-year-old gunman entered the southern Florida school on Valentine’s day. Meanwhile in Congress, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act – the National Rifle Association (NRA)-backed effort to force states to honour concealed carry permits from every other state – is currently with the Senate, having passed the House.
Those claims that teachers would make schools safer if they are packing some concealed heat have come alongside those Republican efforts in Washington to pass the so-called Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act — the National Rifle Association (NRA) backed effort to force states to honour concealed carry permits from every other state. But detractors note that state concealed carry laws, and the qualifications to get a permit, vary widely across the country. Forcing a state to respect another’s concealed carry permit would mean forcing a state to potentially allow people in states with few safeguards or gun training requirements to walk their streets with the same gun rights as the citizens in the stricter state. 
But detractors note that state concealed carry laws, and the qualifications to get a permit, vary widely across the country. Forcing a state to respect another’s concealed carry permit would mean forcing a state to potentially allow people in states with few safeguards or gun training requirements to walk their streets with the same gun rights as the citizens in the stricter state who proved themselves worthy of the permit by way of qualification.  “I think a fundamental problem [with conceal reciprocity] is that in some states, like California, you need a good reason to have a gun, and it can’t be, ‘I like guns’, or ‘I think someone is going to shoot me’. You have to have an actual, particular need. You also have to prove you have good moral character,” said Laura Cutilletta, the legal director at the Giffords Law Centre, a group that advocates for gun control in the US.
“I think a fundamental problem [with conceal reciprocity] is that in some states, like California, you need a good reason to have a gun, and it can’t be, ‘I like guns, or I think someone is going to shoot me’. You have to have an actual, particularized need. You also have to prove you have good moral character,” Laura Cutilletta, the legal director at the Giffords Law Center, a group that advocates for gun control in the US, said. “In other states, it’s pretty much checking off boxes, and they are usually pretty basic: whether you’re prohibited by federal or state law from possessing a gun, there’s usually an age limit, and sometimes that’s about it,” Ms Cutilletta continued. “You don’t need to show any reasoning. You don’t need to show good character. Law enforcement issuing the permit has no discretion to say no.”
“In other states, it’s pretty much checking off boxes, and they are usually pretty basic: Whether you’re prohibited by federal or state law from possessing a gun, there’s usually an age limit, and sometimes that’s about it,” Ms Cutilletta continued. “You don’t need to show any reasoning. You don’t need to show good character. Law enforcement issuing the permit has no discretion to say no.” In some states, convicted felons, individuals with outstanding warrants and individuals with outstanding domestic violence injunctions have been able to receive permits, even if rules may prohibit them from doing so, according to the Gifford Law Centre.
In some states, for instance, the licensing requirements are so relaxed that convicted felons, individuals with outstanding warrants, and individuals with outstanding domestic violence injunctions against them have been able to apply for and receive permits to clandestinely pack heat at alarming rates.
In many of those states and others, as Ms Cutilletta noted, individuals are able to get concealed carry permits without proving that they have even shot a gun, much less have had training to ensure they can shoot one accurately, and know how to appropriately respond to a crisis scenario.In many of those states and others, as Ms Cutilletta noted, individuals are able to get concealed carry permits without proving that they have even shot a gun, much less have had training to ensure they can shoot one accurately, and know how to appropriately respond to a crisis scenario.
Rick Strohmeier, a Kentucky firearms trainer, said he thinks his state — a predominantly Republican one, and far from gun control haven — has the right idea to mandate live-fire training before giving someone the ability to legally bring a gun with them nearly anywhere they want. Rick Strohmeier, a Kentucky firearms trainer, said he thinks his state – a predominantly Republican one, and far from a gun control haven – has the right idea to mandate live-fire training before giving someone the ability to legally bring a gun with them nearly anywhere they want.
“You would not believe the number of people I get who, one: have never fired a weapon, two: maybe their husband or boyfriend gave them pistol and the only thing they told them was ‘it’s loaded, drop the safety and shoot,’”  Mr Strohmeier, a former military officer and criminal justice firearms trainer, said. “You would not believe the number of people I get who, one: have never fired a weapon, two: maybe their husband or boyfriend gave them a pistol and the only thing they told them was, ‘It’s loaded: drop the safety and shoot,’” Mr Strohmeier, a former military officer and criminal justice firearms trainer, said.
Mr Strohmeier said that the training could save a gun owner’s life  — he teaches them what to do when pulled over by police with their guns, for instance — and helps avoid accidents caused by an unfamiliarity with firearms. Mr Strohmeier said that the training could save a gun owner’s life – he teaches them what to do when pulled over by police with their guns, for instance – and helps avoid accidents caused by an unfamiliarity with firearms.
“It takes 2,500 repetitions to build muscle memory. If you want to do something right, you have to practice it,” he said. “The way the carpenter becomes good hammering the nail is he did it 2,500 times. You have to pick up your weapon 2,500 times until your finger automatically goes into the right grip. Shoot it 2,5000 times. The right stance, 2,500 times. Anything you do in your life — combing your hair, wiping your butt — took 2,500 times before you know what you’re doing.” “It takes 2,500 repetitions to build muscle memory. If you want to do something right, you have to practice it,” he said. “The way the carpenter becomes good hammering the nail is he did it 2,500 times. You have to pick up your weapon 2,500 times until your finger automatically goes into the right grip. Shoot it 2,500 times. The right stance, 2,500 times. Anything you do in your life – combing your hair, wiping your butt – took 2,500 times before you know what you’re doing.”
Most firearm instructors, like Mr Strohmeier, recognise the value in live-fire training to the effectiveness of a gun owner’s ability to protect themselves and others — they teach people how to use guns for a living — but generally stop short of advocating for a legal requirement for live training before a concealed carry permit is issued. Most firearm instructors, like Mr Strohmeier, recognise the value in live-fire training to the effectiveness of a gun owner’s ability to protect themselves and others, but generally stop short of advocating for a legal requirement for live training before a concealed carry permit is issued.
For Mr Paulsen, of Concealed Carry Inc, the question of guns training is one of personal responsibility. He said that he thinks that the more his Colorado gun students train with a firearm, the better and safer they’ll be — but says that he does not think the government should arbitrarily define how much training is enough. For Mr Paulsen, of Concealed Carry Inc, the question of guns training is one of personal responsibility. He thinks that the more his Colorado gun students train with a firearm, the better and safer they’ll be – but says that he does not think the government should arbitrarily define how much training is enough.
“I think the more education and training anyone gets, the more able they are to be able to defend themselves. More is always better,” he said. “All gun owners, especially those who carry guns for self-defense, should be proactively getting as much training as you can.” “I think the more education and training anyone gets, the more able they are to be able to defend themselves. More is always better,” he said. “All gun owners, especially those who carry guns for self-defence, should be proactively getting as much training as they can.”