This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/13/appeal-court-rules-that-flat-rate-payments-for-sleep-in-shifts-are-fair

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Appeal court rules that flat-rate payments for sleep-in shifts are fair Appeal court rules flat rate for sleep-in carer shifts is fair
(about 1 hour later)
The court of appeal has overturned a ruling on payments for carers who carry out “sleep-in” shifts for clients with learning disabilities, potentially averting a crisis that employers claim would have jeopardised the care of vulnerable people.The court of appeal has overturned a ruling on payments for carers who carry out “sleep-in” shifts for clients with learning disabilities, potentially averting a crisis that employers claim would have jeopardised the care of vulnerable people.
A court ruled last year that care workers should be paid the national minimum wage (NMW) for every hour of a sleep-in shift – rather than a flat sum – in effect doubling the cost of a shift to £60. It said providers should be liable for six years of back-pay to carers. A court ruled last year that care workers should be paid the national minimum wage (NMW) for every hour of a sleep-in shift, rather than a flat rate – in effect doubling the cost of a shift to £60. It said providers should be liable for six years of back-pay to carers.
On Friday the appeal court reversed the back-pay decision and ruled that flat-rate payments were fair, meaning sleep-in shift carers could receive the full rate only for those hours during which they were awake and assisting the client. On Friday, the court reversed the back-pay decision and ruled flat-rate payments were fair, meaning sleep-in shift carers could receive the full rate only for those hours during which they were awake and assisting the client.
Employers welcomed the ruling, saying that the back-pay liability – collectively estimated at about £400m – would have bankrupted many providers. But they called on the government to issue new guidance on how workers are to be paid for sleep-in shifts, and properly fund the costs. Employers welcomed the ruling, saying the back-pay liability, collectively estimated at about £400m, would have bankrupted many providers. But they called on the government to issue new guidance on how workers are to be paid for sleep-in shifts, and properly fund the costs.
Derek Lewis, the chair of learning disability charity Mencap, which brought the appeal, said: “The prospect of having to make large unfunded back payments had threatened to bankrupt many providers, jeopardising the care of vulnerable people and the employment of their carers.” Derek Lewis, the chairman of the learning disability charity Mencap, which brought the appeal, said: “The prospect of having to make large unfunded back payments had threatened to bankrupt many providers, jeopardising the care of vulnerable people and the employment of their carers.”
He said Mencap had been paying for sleep-ins at the higher rate for over a year and intended to continue despite the court’s decision. “We now call on government to fulfil its responsibilities by legislating so that all carers are entitled to this, and their employers are funded accordingly. He said Mencap had been paying for sleep-ins at the higher rate for more than a year and intended to continue doing so despite the court’s decision. “We now call on government to fulfil its responsibilities by legislating so that all carers are entitled to this, and their employers are funded accordingly,” Lewis said.
“We also call on government to ensure that the social care sector and, in particular, the specialised support that is required for people with a learning disability, is properly funded and its workers are paid what they deserve in the future.”“We also call on government to ensure that the social care sector and, in particular, the specialised support that is required for people with a learning disability, is properly funded and its workers are paid what they deserve in the future.”
Unison called the decision a “mistake” that would enforce “pittance” pay on care workers. The union said it was considering an appeal to the supreme court.Unison called the decision a “mistake” that would enforce “pittance” pay on care workers. The union said it was considering an appeal to the supreme court.
It argued that most care workers should be paid the full rate for sleep-in shifts because they are on constant call, are regularly up during the night to assist the client, and are not free to leave their place of work. It argued most care workers should be paid the full rate for sleep-in shifts because they are on constant call, are regularly up during the night to assist the client, and are not free to leave their place of work.
Dave Prentis, the Unison general secretary, said: “Social care is in crisis, and this situation wouldn’t have arisen if the government had put enough money into the system and enforced minimum wage laws properly.”Dave Prentis, the Unison general secretary, said: “Social care is in crisis, and this situation wouldn’t have arisen if the government had put enough money into the system and enforced minimum wage laws properly.”
Local authorities – which fund the cost of sleep-in shifts through their adult social care budgets – were relieved by the ruling, though they warned that clarity was needed over future costs. Councils in England face an estimated £2bn funding gap in adult social care. Local authorities – which fund the cost of sleep-in shifts through their adult social care budgets – were relieved by the ruling, though they said clarity was needed over future costs. Councils in England face an estimated £2bn funding gap in adult social care.
Rhidian Hughes, the chief executive of the Voluntary Organisations Disability Group, said: “There are no winners from this decision. Now the government has a chance to do the right thing – enshrining and supporting the NMW by ensuring legislation is clear that all workers are entitled to the NMW and funding all essential services at this level.”Rhidian Hughes, the chief executive of the Voluntary Organisations Disability Group, said: “There are no winners from this decision. Now the government has a chance to do the right thing – enshrining and supporting the NMW by ensuring legislation is clear that all workers are entitled to the NMW and funding all essential services at this level.”
Social careSocial care
Learning disabilityLearning disability
Living wageLiving wage
DisabilityDisability
Care workers
Minimum wage
news
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content