This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/444573-russian-nuclear-doctrine-amendment/
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Senators propose change of doctrine so Russia could respond with nukes to any ‘strategic strike’ | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Russia should be allowed to use its nuclear arsenal in response to a non-nuclear strike with a strategic weapon, Russian senators believe. Their recommendation is to amend Russia’s nuclear posture accordingly. | Russia should be allowed to use its nuclear arsenal in response to a non-nuclear strike with a strategic weapon, Russian senators believe. Their recommendation is to amend Russia’s nuclear posture accordingly. |
| A suggestion to make the Russian nuclear doctrine more flexible was backed by the upper chamber of the Russian parliament as part of a wider package of recommendations on how to streamline and improve legislation regulating the use of national armed forces. | |
| The senators said the Russian National Security Council should prepare and propose an amendment on the key strategic deterrence document, which would allow “taking a decision to retaliate in case of enemy use of hypotonic weapons and other strategic conventional weapons” against Russia, reported RIA Novosti. | |
| Russian nuclear doctrine was last reviewed in 2014, when the current escalation of tensions with the West was just unfolding. | |
| It allows the armed forces to deploy nuclear weapons on two scenarios. One is in response to a strike with a nuclear weapon or another weapon of mass destruction against Russia or one of its allies. Another is when a nuclear strike is necessary to prevent a conventional attack threatening the existence of Russia as a sovereign state. | |
| READ MORE: US nuclear buildup shows new arms race has already begun – German FM | READ MORE: US nuclear buildup shows new arms race has already begun – German FM |
| The US has since amended its nuclear posture, relaxing restrictions on when it could use nuclear weapons. The latest review published in February is intentionally somewhat vague, but it called for developing new kinds of nuclear weapons and indicated that the US may nuke a country for as little as launching a cyberattack against America or one of its allies. | The US has since amended its nuclear posture, relaxing restrictions on when it could use nuclear weapons. The latest review published in February is intentionally somewhat vague, but it called for developing new kinds of nuclear weapons and indicated that the US may nuke a country for as little as launching a cyberattack against America or one of its allies. |
| Further destabilizing the deterrence architecture is the US’ declared intention to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, a key Cold War era agreement with Russia which led to large-scale denuclearization of Europe. The treaty banned both the US and Russia from developing and deploying nuclear-capable land-based missiles with the range best suited for an exchange between Russia and European members of NATO. | Further destabilizing the deterrence architecture is the US’ declared intention to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, a key Cold War era agreement with Russia which led to large-scale denuclearization of Europe. The treaty banned both the US and Russia from developing and deploying nuclear-capable land-based missiles with the range best suited for an exchange between Russia and European members of NATO. |
| The hundreds of such weapons deployed by each side prior to sealing the INF agreement were a major destabilizing factor. They required only minutes in flight to reach their targets, as opposed to dozens of minutes for intercontinental missiles. So if a launch were to be detected, it would leave almost no time to assess whether it was an actual attack requiring a response or a false alarm. | The hundreds of such weapons deployed by each side prior to sealing the INF agreement were a major destabilizing factor. They required only minutes in flight to reach their targets, as opposed to dozens of minutes for intercontinental missiles. So if a launch were to be detected, it would leave almost no time to assess whether it was an actual attack requiring a response or a false alarm. |
| The recommendations from the Senate were the result of a round table discussion with officials from the Defense Ministry, the General Staff and the Security Council. Another suggestion made is for the Russian Foreign Ministry to seek an agreement with foreign nations close to Russia to ban hosting of sites conducting biological research with military applications by third parties – an obvious jab at a suspected site of this nature located in Georgia. | The recommendations from the Senate were the result of a round table discussion with officials from the Defense Ministry, the General Staff and the Security Council. Another suggestion made is for the Russian Foreign Ministry to seek an agreement with foreign nations close to Russia to ban hosting of sites conducting biological research with military applications by third parties – an obvious jab at a suspected site of this nature located in Georgia. |
| Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |