This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/444573-russian-nuclear-doctrine-amendment/
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Senators propose change of doctrine so Russia could respond with nukes to any ‘strategic strike’ | Senators propose change of doctrine so Russia could respond with nukes to any ‘strategic strike’ |
(35 minutes later) | |
Russia should be allowed to use its nuclear arsenal in response to a non-nuclear strike with a strategic weapon, Russian senators believe. Their recommendation is to amend Russia’s nuclear posture accordingly. | Russia should be allowed to use its nuclear arsenal in response to a non-nuclear strike with a strategic weapon, Russian senators believe. Their recommendation is to amend Russia’s nuclear posture accordingly. |
A suggestion to make the Russian nuclear doctrine more flexible was one of the reccomendations backed by the upper chamber of the Russian parliament late on Wednesday. | |
The senators said the Russian National Security Council should prepare and propose an amendment on the nuclear doctrine, which would allow “taking a decision to retaliate in case of enemy use of hypersonic and other strategic conventional weapons” against Russia, reported RIA Novosti. | |
Russian nuclear doctrine was last reviewed in 2014, when the current escalation of tensions with the West was just unfolding. | Russian nuclear doctrine was last reviewed in 2014, when the current escalation of tensions with the West was just unfolding. |
It allows the armed forces to deploy nuclear weapons on two scenarios. One is in response to a strike with a nuclear weapon or another weapon of mass destruction against Russia or one of its allies. Another is when a nuclear strike is necessary to prevent a conventional attack threatening the existence of Russia as a sovereign state. | It allows the armed forces to deploy nuclear weapons on two scenarios. One is in response to a strike with a nuclear weapon or another weapon of mass destruction against Russia or one of its allies. Another is when a nuclear strike is necessary to prevent a conventional attack threatening the existence of Russia as a sovereign state. |
READ MORE: US nuclear buildup shows new arms race has already begun – German FM | READ MORE: US nuclear buildup shows new arms race has already begun – German FM |
The US has since amended its nuclear posture, relaxing restrictions on when it could use nuclear weapons. | |
The latest review published in February is intentionally somewhat vague, but it called for developing new kinds of nuclear weapons and indicated that the US may nuke a country for as little as launching a cyberattack against America or one of its allies. | |
The US has also recently announced its intention to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, a key Cold War era agreement with Russia which led to large-scale denuclearization of Europe. The treaty banned both the US and Russia from developing and deploying nuclear-capable land-based missiles with the range best suited for an exchange between Russia and European members of NATO. | |
Hundreds of such weapons deployed by each side prior to sealing the INF agreement were a major destabilizing factor. They required only minutes in flight to reach their targets, as opposed to dozens of minutes for intercontinental missiles. So if a launch were to be detected, it would leave almost no time to assess whether it was an actual attack requiring a response or a false alarm. | |
The recommendations from the Senate were the result of a round table discussion with officials from the Defense Ministry, the General Staff and the Security Council. | |
Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |