This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7797582.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Nimrod victims' families sue MoD Nimrod victims' families sue MoD
(30 minutes later)
Defence Secretary John Hutton has been served with a writ by relatives of two of 14 men who died when a Nimrod plane exploded in mid-flight in Afghanistan.Defence Secretary John Hutton has been served with a writ by relatives of two of 14 men who died when a Nimrod plane exploded in mid-flight in Afghanistan.
The action accuses the MoD of negligence, failing to minimise risk and a breach of the right to life.The action accuses the MoD of negligence, failing to minimise risk and a breach of the right to life.
A holding writ was served in September, the full form had to be in by January.A holding writ was served in September, the full form had to be in by January.
In May, a coroner ruled the Nimrod fleet had never been airworthy. The MoD said it had already planned to compensate families of the servicemen.In May, a coroner ruled the Nimrod fleet had never been airworthy. The MoD said it had already planned to compensate families of the servicemen.
The coroner also said the fleet, based at RAF Kinloss in Moray, should be grounded.
The Nimrod spy plane exploded on 2 September 2006, shortly after undergoing air-to-air refuelling.The Nimrod spy plane exploded on 2 September 2006, shortly after undergoing air-to-air refuelling.
The blast was caused by fuel leaking into a dry bay and igniting on contact with a hot air pipe.The blast was caused by fuel leaking into a dry bay and igniting on contact with a hot air pipe.
We want to know who was responsible, who should have made sure it was airworthy and failed in their duty of care Graham KnightWe want to know who was responsible, who should have made sure it was airworthy and failed in their duty of care Graham Knight
The legal action is being brought by the families of Sgt Ben Knight, 25, and Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick, 28.The legal action is being brought by the families of Sgt Ben Knight, 25, and Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick, 28.
Graham Knight, Ben's father, said: "It is about accountability.Graham Knight, Ben's father, said: "It is about accountability.
"When you look at things that have happened recently like the Baby P case, it was tragic that child died and there were resignations and sackings."When you look at things that have happened recently like the Baby P case, it was tragic that child died and there were resignations and sackings.
"In this case there was an aircraft that was not airworthy, 14 men died and as far as we know not one person has had action taken against them."In this case there was an aircraft that was not airworthy, 14 men died and as far as we know not one person has had action taken against them.
"We want to know who was responsible, who should have made sure it was airworthy and failed in their duty of care.""We want to know who was responsible, who should have made sure it was airworthy and failed in their duty of care."
The issuing of the writ is the first time the department has faced a legal challenge under the European Convention of Human Rights.The issuing of the writ is the first time the department has faced a legal challenge under the European Convention of Human Rights.
If it is successful it could pave the way for other families to sue the government over the death of loved ones in Iraq or Afghanistan.If it is successful it could pave the way for other families to sue the government over the death of loved ones in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The MoD has said new procedures mean the Nimrod aircraft is safe.The MoD has said new procedures mean the Nimrod aircraft is safe.