This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/impeachment-trial-live-updates/2020/01/21/a52d9a74-3c3c-11ea-b90d-5652806c3b3a_story.html

The article has changed 31 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 21 Version 22
Impeachment trial live updates: Senate rejects Democratic effort to subpoena White House for Ukraine documents Impeachment trial live updates: Senate rejects Democratic effort to subpoena White House for Ukraine documents
(32 minutes later)
Senators began debate Tuesday afternoon over the rules that will guide the impeachment trial of President Trump — just the third in history of a U.S. president — focused on his conduct toward Ukraine.Senators began debate Tuesday afternoon over the rules that will guide the impeachment trial of President Trump — just the third in history of a U.S. president — focused on his conduct toward Ukraine.
The Senate rejected two Democratic amendments to subpoena documents and other records from the White House and State Department related to the Ukraine probe. The White House stonewalled requests for those records by House investigators during their inquiry. Each amendment was tabled on a 53-to-47 party-line vote. The Senate rejected three Democratic amendments to subpoena documents and other records from the White House, State Department and Office of Management and Budget related to the Ukraine probe. The White House stonewalled requests for those records by House investigators during their inquiry. Each amendment was tabled on a 53-to-47 party-line vote.
Senators are hearing from House managers and Trump’s attorneys regarding a resolution proposed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) that seeks a swift trial. Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), have panned the proposal, arguing that it is part of an effort to “cover up” Trump’s dealings. In public appearances Tuesday, the House impeachment managers urged the Senate to reject McConnell’s rules.Senators are hearing from House managers and Trump’s attorneys regarding a resolution proposed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) that seeks a swift trial. Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), have panned the proposal, arguing that it is part of an effort to “cover up” Trump’s dealings. In public appearances Tuesday, the House impeachment managers urged the Senate to reject McConnell’s rules.
The impeachment charges center on the allegation that Trump withheld military aid and a White House meeting to pressure Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, a political rival, as well as his son Hunter Biden.The impeachment charges center on the allegation that Trump withheld military aid and a White House meeting to pressure Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, a political rival, as well as his son Hunter Biden.
●White House calls for Trump acquittal in ‘rigged’ impeachment as Senate prepares for quick trial.●White House calls for Trump acquittal in ‘rigged’ impeachment as Senate prepares for quick trial.
●Trump’s lawyers, Senate GOP allies work privately to ensure former national security adviser John Bolton does not testify publicly.●Trump’s lawyers, Senate GOP allies work privately to ensure former national security adviser John Bolton does not testify publicly.
●Republicans rally behind Trump as Senate impeachment trial begins.●Republicans rally behind Trump as Senate impeachment trial begins.
The Senate impeachment trial process | The impeachment managers | Which senators support removing Trump | Trump’s legal team brief | House Democrats’ responseThe Senate impeachment trial process | The impeachment managers | Which senators support removing Trump | Trump’s legal team brief | House Democrats’ response
Rep. Jason Crow, a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, outlined the Democratic case for subpoenaing documents from the Office of Management and Budget. On a 53-to-47 vote, the Senate on Tuesday rejected Schumer’s third amendment.
The motion would have allowed the Senate to obtain Office of Management and Budget documents regarding the suspension of military aid to Ukraine.
The chamber is now in the midst of a dinnertime recess.
At one point in Tuesday’s proceedings, Jay Sekulow, an outside attorney for Trump, became indignant at what he described as a mention of “lawyer lawsuits” by Democrats.
“And by the way — lawyer lawsuits?” Sekulow scoffed. “Lawyer lawsuits? We’re talking about the impeachment of a president of the United States, duly elected, and the members, the managers are complaining about lawyer lawsuits? ... It’s disrespecting the Constitution of the United States to even say that in this chamber. Lawyer lawsuits!”
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, responded that he wasn’t quite sure what Sekulow was referencing, but that the Trump administration had repeatedly sought to thwart Democratic efforts in court to compel the inclusion of key witnesses and documents.
“Mr. Sekulow says something about ‘lawyer lawsuits,’” Schiff said. “Now, I have to confess, I wasn’t completely following the argument, but something about ‘lawyer lawsuits.’ ... [The Trump administration] is in court saying you can’t have lawyer lawsuits. So that argument cannot be made in both directions.”
The exchange prompted some to speculate that Sekulow may have misheard Rep. Val Demings’s (D-Fla.) repeated mentions of “FOIA lawsuits,” or Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, during her opening remarks.
More than a dozen senators left their seats or the Senate floor in the 6 o’clock hour as Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) argued in support of an amendment to subpoena documents from OMB.
After Schumer offered the amendment, McConnell said a 30-minute dinner break would have to wait until after debate and a vote.
At that point, senators on both sides of the aisle took the opportunity to stretch their legs or use the restroom, even as Crow spoke. The movement was notable, as senators are admonished to remain seated and silent during the proceedings and followed this practice throughout the day.
Among the senators who left their seats were Republicans Roy Blunt (Mo.), Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), Bill Cassidy (La.), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Jerry Moran (Kan.), David Perdue (Ga.), Rob Portman (Ohio), Pat Roberts (Kan.), Ben Sasse (Neb.) and Todd C. Young (Ind.) and Democrats Michael F. Bennet (Colo.), Ben Cardin (Md.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Mark R. Warner (Va.) and Ron Wyden (Ore.).
Crow, a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, outlined the Democratic case for subpoenaing documents from the Office of Management and Budget.
The Colorado Democrat referenced his own military service — and the “memories that are seared in my brain” from that time — as he argued that Trump’s effort to withhold the aid from Ukraine matters.The Colorado Democrat referenced his own military service — and the “memories that are seared in my brain” from that time — as he argued that Trump’s effort to withhold the aid from Ukraine matters.
“One of those memories was scavenging scrap metal on the streets of Baghdad in the summer of 2003 — that we had to bolt onto the side of our trucks because we had no armor to protect against roadside bombs,” Crow said. “So when we talk about troops not getting the equipment that they need when they need it, it’s personal to me.”“One of those memories was scavenging scrap metal on the streets of Baghdad in the summer of 2003 — that we had to bolt onto the side of our trucks because we had no armor to protect against roadside bombs,” Crow said. “So when we talk about troops not getting the equipment that they need when they need it, it’s personal to me.”
Crow pointed to several reported excerpts from the OMB emails, noting that they offer “stark examples of the chaos and confusion that the president’s scheme set off across our government.”Crow pointed to several reported excerpts from the OMB emails, noting that they offer “stark examples of the chaos and confusion that the president’s scheme set off across our government.”
“The Senate has an opportunity to obtain and review the full record that could further demonstrate how and why the president was holding the aid,” he said.“The Senate has an opportunity to obtain and review the full record that could further demonstrate how and why the president was holding the aid,” he said.
About five and a half hours into the impeachment trial, many senators were showing some serious signs of wear – despite having already taken two breaks. And one who appeared to doze off during the proceedings took it upon himself afterward to try to enforce the time.About five and a half hours into the impeachment trial, many senators were showing some serious signs of wear – despite having already taken two breaks. And one who appeared to doze off during the proceedings took it upon himself afterward to try to enforce the time.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, had 13 minutes on the clock when he started his last argument in favor of an amendment to subpoena the State Department for outstanding documents. With about two minutes to go, his deputy investigations director held up a sign that read “2,” signaling that he should wrap up. Schiff had 13 minutes on the clock when he started his last argument in favor of an amendment to subpoena the State Department for outstanding documents. With about two minutes to go, his deputy investigations director held up a sign that read “2,” signaling that he should wrap up.
And then Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) started tapping on his wristwatch.And then Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) started tapping on his wristwatch.
While it was not clear whether Risch was trying to get the attention of Schiff or Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in the silent room, the incessant “tap-tap-tap-tap-tap-tap” was the loudest thing other than Schiff’s voice.While it was not clear whether Risch was trying to get the attention of Schiff or Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in the silent room, the incessant “tap-tap-tap-tap-tap-tap” was the loudest thing other than Schiff’s voice.
Lawmakers, when they are allowed to speak, are fond of reminding their colleagues when they have gone over their allotted time — and Risch in particular is used to being a timekeeper, as he is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and can enforce the clock on his committee colleagues.Lawmakers, when they are allowed to speak, are fond of reminding their colleagues when they have gone over their allotted time — and Risch in particular is used to being a timekeeper, as he is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and can enforce the clock on his committee colleagues.
When his tapping didn’t work after about 30 seconds, Risch desisted — but still sat there with his watch-arm raised, emphatically staring at his wrist, the impeachment equivalent of sign language.When his tapping didn’t work after about 30 seconds, Risch desisted — but still sat there with his watch-arm raised, emphatically staring at his wrist, the impeachment equivalent of sign language.
About another 30 seconds later, Risch began tapping again — and this time, Roberts seemed to better agree with his timekeeping, hitting his gavel to end Schiff’s speech.About another 30 seconds later, Risch began tapping again — and this time, Roberts seemed to better agree with his timekeeping, hitting his gavel to end Schiff’s speech.
On a 53-to-47 vote, the Senate on Tuesday rejected Schumer’s second amendment.On a 53-to-47 vote, the Senate on Tuesday rejected Schumer’s second amendment.
The amendment would have allowed the Senate to obtain State Department documents and records that the Trump administration refused to provide during the House impeachment probe of Trump and his dealing with Ukraine.The amendment would have allowed the Senate to obtain State Department documents and records that the Trump administration refused to provide during the House impeachment probe of Trump and his dealing with Ukraine.
The Republican majority successfully moved to block Schumer’s measure.The Republican majority successfully moved to block Schumer’s measure.
Schumer’s third amendment Tuesday will be a motion to have the Senate subpoena Office of Management and Budget documents regarding the suspension of military aid to Ukraine.Schumer’s third amendment Tuesday will be a motion to have the Senate subpoena Office of Management and Budget documents regarding the suspension of military aid to Ukraine.
In a statement, Schumer’s office said the OMB “is in possession of highly relevant records and communications related to the charges against the president.”In a statement, Schumer’s office said the OMB “is in possession of highly relevant records and communications related to the charges against the president.”
Earlier this month, Just Security’s Kate Brannen reported on unredacted emails showing that OMB and the Defense Department discussed the withholding of aid to Ukraine.Earlier this month, Just Security’s Kate Brannen reported on unredacted emails showing that OMB and the Defense Department discussed the withholding of aid to Ukraine.
In one email on Aug. 30, for instance, Michael Duffey, OMB’s associate national security programs director, wrote that there was “clear direction from POTUS to continue to hold,” using an acronym for the president of the United States.In one email on Aug. 30, for instance, Michael Duffey, OMB’s associate national security programs director, wrote that there was “clear direction from POTUS to continue to hold,” using an acronym for the president of the United States.
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) sent a letter to Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger on Tuesday voicing “extreme concern and discomfort” about the restrictions placed on reporters covering the Senate impeachment trial.Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) sent a letter to Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger on Tuesday voicing “extreme concern and discomfort” about the restrictions placed on reporters covering the Senate impeachment trial.
“The American people expect and deserve a level of transparency and access to information about their government,” Heinrich wrote. “The draconian restrictions placed on the Capitol press corps for the impeachment trial should be modified in a way that better balances access and security.”“The American people expect and deserve a level of transparency and access to information about their government,” Heinrich wrote. “The draconian restrictions placed on the Capitol press corps for the impeachment trial should be modified in a way that better balances access and security.”
“Hindering a free and open press is a disservice to the public, and further undermines a fair process that is reflective of our American values,” he added.“Hindering a free and open press is a disservice to the public, and further undermines a fair process that is reflective of our American values,” he added.
The Democratic case to subpoena the State Department didn’t make much of an impression on one key Republican senator, James E. Risch of Idaho, who appeared to be asleep for a significant portion of it.The Democratic case to subpoena the State Department didn’t make much of an impression on one key Republican senator, James E. Risch of Idaho, who appeared to be asleep for a significant portion of it.
Shortly after 5:30 p.m., Risch — chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees the State Department — could be seen from the press gallery motionless, with his eyes closed and head slumped against his right hand.Shortly after 5:30 p.m., Risch — chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees the State Department — could be seen from the press gallery motionless, with his eyes closed and head slumped against his right hand.
Risch was the first lawmaker seen by Washington Post reporters to clearly have fallen asleep, about four hours after the trial proceedings began Tuesday.Risch was the first lawmaker seen by Washington Post reporters to clearly have fallen asleep, about four hours after the trial proceedings began Tuesday.
When Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.) cued up video of testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Risch briefly perked up, but quickly closed his eyes again. When Demings cued up video of testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Risch briefly perked up, but quickly closed his eyes again.
The apparent snooze ended about 15 minutes later, at 5:52 p.m., after Demings summarized another video clip.The apparent snooze ended about 15 minutes later, at 5:52 p.m., after Demings summarized another video clip.
Demings, an impeachment manager and former police officer, reviewed the two articles facing Trump, noting that the president wanted Ukraine to announce “investigations that everyone in this chamber knows to be bogus.”Demings, an impeachment manager and former police officer, reviewed the two articles facing Trump, noting that the president wanted Ukraine to announce “investigations that everyone in this chamber knows to be bogus.”
“The president didn’t even care if an investigation was actually conducted, just that it was announced,” Demings said. “Why? Because this was for his own personal and political benefit.”“The president didn’t even care if an investigation was actually conducted, just that it was announced,” Demings said. “Why? Because this was for his own personal and political benefit.”
On the second article, Demings said that Trump ordered “his entire administration — every office, every agency, every official — to defy every subpoena served in the House impeachment inquiry.”On the second article, Demings said that Trump ordered “his entire administration — every office, every agency, every official — to defy every subpoena served in the House impeachment inquiry.”
“President Trump did not take these extreme steps to hide evidence of his innocence or to protect the institution of the presidency,” she said. “As a career law enforcement officer, I have never seen anyone take such extreme steps to hide evidence allegedly proving his innocence, and I do not find that here today. The president is engaged in this coverup because he is guilty and he knows it.”“President Trump did not take these extreme steps to hide evidence of his innocence or to protect the institution of the presidency,” she said. “As a career law enforcement officer, I have never seen anyone take such extreme steps to hide evidence allegedly proving his innocence, and I do not find that here today. The president is engaged in this coverup because he is guilty and he knows it.”
Demings also outlined some of the evidence Democrats have used to make their case against Trump, pointing to the statements of several administration officials and other associates of the president.Demings also outlined some of the evidence Democrats have used to make their case against Trump, pointing to the statements of several administration officials and other associates of the president.
Trump will sit for two TV interviews Wednesday morning at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.Trump will sit for two TV interviews Wednesday morning at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Both CNBC and Fox Business Network are expected to air their interviews with Trump in the 5 a.m. hour.Both CNBC and Fox Business Network are expected to air their interviews with Trump in the 5 a.m. hour.
Not only are those taking part in Trump’s impeachment trial barred from speaking or having their phones during the hours and hours of debate, they also face strict rules on what beverages they’re allowed to drink in the chamber.Not only are those taking part in Trump’s impeachment trial barred from speaking or having their phones during the hours and hours of debate, they also face strict rules on what beverages they’re allowed to drink in the chamber.
One could imagine, then, that on the short breaks they’re given, many run straight for the coffee machine.One could imagine, then, that on the short breaks they’re given, many run straight for the coffee machine.
According to Riddick’s Senate Procedure — a lengthy tome that one former senator described as “the nearest thing to the Bible that the Senate has” — those in the Senate chamber may drink only water or milk.According to Riddick’s Senate Procedure — a lengthy tome that one former senator described as “the nearest thing to the Bible that the Senate has” — those in the Senate chamber may drink only water or milk.
Water has long been allowed, but the milk precedent was set in 1966, the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported. No milk is allowed in the House, according to a Washingtonian report.Water has long been allowed, but the milk precedent was set in 1966, the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported. No milk is allowed in the House, according to a Washingtonian report.
The rules on what lawmakers are allowed to drink are strictly enforced on both sides of the Capitol: In 2018, freshman Rep. Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) was stopped by a guard when he tried to walk onto the House floor while holding a cup of coffee.The rules on what lawmakers are allowed to drink are strictly enforced on both sides of the Capitol: In 2018, freshman Rep. Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) was stopped by a guard when he tried to walk onto the House floor while holding a cup of coffee.
Senators took the first votes of the Trump impeachment trial from their seats, rising at the clerk’s call of their name to vote “aye” or “nay.” The vote came shortly after 4:30 p.m., about three hours after debate began, and proceeded along strict party lines.Senators took the first votes of the Trump impeachment trial from their seats, rising at the clerk’s call of their name to vote “aye” or “nay.” The vote came shortly after 4:30 p.m., about three hours after debate began, and proceeded along strict party lines.
Those two words are likely to be the only words most senators are permitted to say on the record during the trial.Those two words are likely to be the only words most senators are permitted to say on the record during the trial.
The vote, on a motion to table a Democratic subpoena request, came after arguments from Democratic managers Zoe Lofgren and Schiff, rebutted by Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin.The vote, on a motion to table a Democratic subpoena request, came after arguments from Democratic managers Zoe Lofgren and Schiff, rebutted by Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin.
Watching from the wings of the House floor were three members of the Trump advocacy team, GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Mark Meadows (N.C.) and Lee Zeldin (N.Y.).Watching from the wings of the House floor were three members of the Trump advocacy team, GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Mark Meadows (N.C.) and Lee Zeldin (N.Y.).
On a 53 to 47 vote, the Senate on Tuesday rejected an amendment from Schumer focused on acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and any “documents, communications and other records” kept by the White House, including the National Security Council.On a 53 to 47 vote, the Senate on Tuesday rejected an amendment from Schumer focused on acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and any “documents, communications and other records” kept by the White House, including the National Security Council.
The White House had stonewalled the House impeachment probe, denying access to documents and witnesses.The White House had stonewalled the House impeachment probe, denying access to documents and witnesses.
After it was voted down, the Senate moved on to debate Schumer’s second amendment requesting relevant documents and records kept by the State Department.After it was voted down, the Senate moved on to debate Schumer’s second amendment requesting relevant documents and records kept by the State Department.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the only one of the House managers to have also played a role in the impeachment proceedings against Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, was the first to take over the podium from lead manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), to make the case for why the Senate should issue subpoenas for additional documents from the White House.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the only one of the House managers to have also played a role in the impeachment proceedings against Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, was the first to take over the podium from lead manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), to make the case for why the Senate should issue subpoenas for additional documents from the White House.
Lofgren pleaded the bulk of her case to the Republican side of the room, turning her body in varying degrees to the right side where the GOP sits, as she argued — sometimes sternly, sometimes smiling — that it was vital that the Senate not only adopt a motion to subpoena White House documents, but that “it should be adopted now.”Lofgren pleaded the bulk of her case to the Republican side of the room, turning her body in varying degrees to the right side where the GOP sits, as she argued — sometimes sternly, sometimes smiling — that it was vital that the Senate not only adopt a motion to subpoena White House documents, but that “it should be adopted now.”
Lofgren pointed out to senators that the White House was sitting on at least hundreds of pages of materials pertaining to communications with the Ukrainians, the decision to withhold military aid, and the concerns that several staffers at the National Security Council reported to lawyers there — all of which, she stressed, were relevant to the current case.Lofgren pointed out to senators that the White House was sitting on at least hundreds of pages of materials pertaining to communications with the Ukrainians, the decision to withhold military aid, and the concerns that several staffers at the National Security Council reported to lawyers there — all of which, she stressed, were relevant to the current case.
She played video from the testimony of various witnesses from the House’s impeachment inquiry, including that of NSC employee Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Vice President Pence staffer Jennifer Williams, who reported that they submitted notes about discrepancies in the transcript of Trump’s July 25 call, and former NSC senior Russia and Europe director Fiona Hill, who spoke with an NSC lawyer — pointing out those materials had not been shared with Congress.She played video from the testimony of various witnesses from the House’s impeachment inquiry, including that of NSC employee Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Vice President Pence staffer Jennifer Williams, who reported that they submitted notes about discrepancies in the transcript of Trump’s July 25 call, and former NSC senior Russia and Europe director Fiona Hill, who spoke with an NSC lawyer — pointing out those materials had not been shared with Congress.
“Attorney-client privilege cannot shield information about misconduct,” Lofgren argued, stressing that the “most important” information would be held at the White House — and that senators should see it, regardless of what it might say.“Attorney-client privilege cannot shield information about misconduct,” Lofgren argued, stressing that the “most important” information would be held at the White House — and that senators should see it, regardless of what it might say.
This isn’t Lofgren’s first turn on the floor managing an impeachment case: In 2010, she and Schiff were managers in the impeachment of ousted Judge Thomas Porteous.This isn’t Lofgren’s first turn on the floor managing an impeachment case: In 2010, she and Schiff were managers in the impeachment of ousted Judge Thomas Porteous.
Former Arizona Republican senator Jeff Flake was in the VIP section of the public gallery, sitting in the front row for about 20 minutes, watching the proceedings.Former Arizona Republican senator Jeff Flake was in the VIP section of the public gallery, sitting in the front row for about 20 minutes, watching the proceedings.
Flake, who retired from the Senate as one of Trump’s fiercest critics, sat on the side of the gallery overlooking his former Republican friends.Flake, who retired from the Senate as one of Trump’s fiercest critics, sat on the side of the gallery overlooking his former Republican friends.
In late December, Flake wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post in which he called on his former GOP colleagues to ask themselves what they would have said if President Barack Obama engaged in the same behavior as Trump.In late December, Flake wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post in which he called on his former GOP colleagues to ask themselves what they would have said if President Barack Obama engaged in the same behavior as Trump.
“I know the answer to that question with certainty, and so do you,” Flake wrote on Dec. 20. “You would have understood with striking clarity the threat it posed, and you would have known exactly what to do.”“I know the answer to that question with certainty, and so do you,” Flake wrote on Dec. 20. “You would have understood with striking clarity the threat it posed, and you would have known exactly what to do.”
Sitting about five seats away from Flake, also in the front row VIP section, was Alyssa Milano. Milano, an activist, also attended the confirmation hearings of Brett M. Kavanaugh.Sitting about five seats away from Flake, also in the front row VIP section, was Alyssa Milano. Milano, an activist, also attended the confirmation hearings of Brett M. Kavanaugh.
Milano tweeted four hours ago a photo of her ticket to the gallery, writing, “I’m in the Senate Chamber for the removal trial. This is what democracy looks like. They’re taking my phone. I’ll update later.”Milano tweeted four hours ago a photo of her ticket to the gallery, writing, “I’m in the Senate Chamber for the removal trial. This is what democracy looks like. They’re taking my phone. I’ll update later.”
Senate Republicans made special efforts to greet members of Trump’s legal team during a brief recess Tuesday afternoon, highlighting the close ties between the defense and members of the GOP conference.Senate Republicans made special efforts to greet members of Trump’s legal team during a brief recess Tuesday afternoon, highlighting the close ties between the defense and members of the GOP conference.
As McConnell called the break, the House impeachment managers quickly left the floor. But Trump’s lawyers lingered as Republican senators approached them for handshakes and conversation.As McConnell called the break, the House impeachment managers quickly left the floor. But Trump’s lawyers lingered as Republican senators approached them for handshakes and conversation.
Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) made an almost complete circuit around the table, greeting each member of the team, as McConnell spoke to Cipollone.Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) made an almost complete circuit around the table, greeting each member of the team, as McConnell spoke to Cipollone.
Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) smiled as he approached Bondi, the former attorney general of Florida.Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) smiled as he approached Bondi, the former attorney general of Florida.
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) spoke to Sekulow.Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) spoke to Sekulow.
Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Barasso (R-Wyo.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) also spoke to members of Trump’s team.Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Barasso (R-Wyo.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) also spoke to members of Trump’s team.
As the lawyers left the floor, several groups of senators had gathered to debrief.As the lawyers left the floor, several groups of senators had gathered to debrief.
Near the center of the chamber, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and an animated James E. Risch (R-Idaho) spoke for several minutes.Near the center of the chamber, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and an animated James E. Risch (R-Idaho) spoke for several minutes.
This group drew special attention from a handful of reporters still in the gallery, given the special role Collins, Murkowski and Alexander could play in the debate over witness testimony. But none of their conversation was audible to the press.This group drew special attention from a handful of reporters still in the gallery, given the special role Collins, Murkowski and Alexander could play in the debate over witness testimony. But none of their conversation was audible to the press.
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) might not have been named to Trump’s anti-impeachment team — but he crossed the Capitol anyway to visit the trial.Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) might not have been named to Trump’s anti-impeachment team — but he crossed the Capitol anyway to visit the trial.
As Cipollone delivered his remarks, Gohmert entered the back of the Senate chamber through the Republican cloakroom and was guided to a seat on the perimeter, where he watched the proceedings alone and in silence.As Cipollone delivered his remarks, Gohmert entered the back of the Senate chamber through the Republican cloakroom and was guided to a seat on the perimeter, where he watched the proceedings alone and in silence.
Gohmert was a vocal defender of the president during the impeachment process in the House, delivering some of the inquiry’s most provocative comments.Gohmert was a vocal defender of the president during the impeachment process in the House, delivering some of the inquiry’s most provocative comments.
The White House announced Monday that eight of Gohmert’s colleagues would assist Trump’s legal team during the Senate trial — Reps. Douglas A. Collins (R-Ga.), Mike Johnson (R-La.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.), Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.).The White House announced Monday that eight of Gohmert’s colleagues would assist Trump’s legal team during the Senate trial — Reps. Douglas A. Collins (R-Ga.), Mike Johnson (R-La.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.), Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.).
The trial moved to two hours of debate on Schumer’s amendment, which would have the Senate subpoena White House documents related to the charges against Trump.The trial moved to two hours of debate on Schumer’s amendment, which would have the Senate subpoena White House documents related to the charges against Trump.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), one of the House impeachment managers, took the floor first. He began by rebutting some of the claims made by the president’s lawyers, including White House counsel Pat Cipollone’s assertion that Republicans were not allowed in the closed-door impeachment depositions.Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), one of the House impeachment managers, took the floor first. He began by rebutting some of the claims made by the president’s lawyers, including White House counsel Pat Cipollone’s assertion that Republicans were not allowed in the closed-door impeachment depositions.
“Every Republican on the three investigative committees” was allowed to participate, Schiff said, calling Cippolone “mistaken” on the matter.“Every Republican on the three investigative committees” was allowed to participate, Schiff said, calling Cippolone “mistaken” on the matter.
Schiff also said he expects Republicans to make more attacks on himself and other managers such as House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) in an effort to distract from the issues at hand.Schiff also said he expects Republicans to make more attacks on himself and other managers such as House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) in an effort to distract from the issues at hand.
“You’ll hear more of that,” Schiff said. “I’m not going to do them dignity of responding to them.”“You’ll hear more of that,” Schiff said. “I’m not going to do them dignity of responding to them.”
He also used a vulgarity to describe the McConnell resolution.He also used a vulgarity to describe the McConnell resolution.
“We don’t want to talk about how — pardon the expression — assbackwards it is to have a trial and then ask for witnesses, and so we’ll attack the House managers, because maybe we can distract you for a moment from what’s before you,” he said, delivering a paraphrase of his view of the GOP argument.“We don’t want to talk about how — pardon the expression — assbackwards it is to have a trial and then ask for witnesses, and so we’ll attack the House managers, because maybe we can distract you for a moment from what’s before you,” he said, delivering a paraphrase of his view of the GOP argument.
White House counsel Pat Cipollone took a dig at the 2020 candidates forced to step off the campaign trail to act as jurors in the Senate trial.White House counsel Pat Cipollone took a dig at the 2020 candidates forced to step off the campaign trail to act as jurors in the Senate trial.
“Some of you are upset because you should be in Iowa right now,” he said.“Some of you are upset because you should be in Iowa right now,” he said.
Several senators cast glances toward Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). He watched Cipollone’s remarks with his elbows on the arms of his chair, hands folded in front of his face, peering out from above what looked like fists. Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) threw a knowing look at Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), his neighbor. She looked back, then resumed taking notes.Several senators cast glances toward Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). He watched Cipollone’s remarks with his elbows on the arms of his chair, hands folded in front of his face, peering out from above what looked like fists. Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) threw a knowing look at Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), his neighbor. She looked back, then resumed taking notes.
On Twitter, Klobuchar shot back: “No. This is my constitutional duty. And I can do two things at once.”On Twitter, Klobuchar shot back: “No. This is my constitutional duty. And I can do two things at once.”
Sanders (I-Vt.) told reporters before walking into the Senate chambers before the trial began that he is balancing campaigning and impeachment duties “with much difficulty.”Sanders (I-Vt.) told reporters before walking into the Senate chambers before the trial began that he is balancing campaigning and impeachment duties “with much difficulty.”
“We have a great group of volunteers in Iowa, New Hampshire knocking on doors in very, very cold weather and we’re going to be dependent on them,” Sanders said. “I have to do my constitutional responsibility and I’m here.”“We have a great group of volunteers in Iowa, New Hampshire knocking on doors in very, very cold weather and we’re going to be dependent on them,” Sanders said. “I have to do my constitutional responsibility and I’m here.”
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) had few words as she arrived on Capitol Hill for the first day of debate in the Senate trial.Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) had few words as she arrived on Capitol Hill for the first day of debate in the Senate trial.
“The people of America want us to get rid of this president, and Mitch McConnell is trying to rig the rules so that Donald Trump can stay in office — this is wrong,” Warren said, before walking briskly down a hallway.“The people of America want us to get rid of this president, and Mitch McConnell is trying to rig the rules so that Donald Trump can stay in office — this is wrong,” Warren said, before walking briskly down a hallway.
White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone called out House Democrats, and Rep. Adam B. Schiff in particular, for avoiding a court decision on a key witness in the impeachment inquiry. Cipollone was referring to a closely watched case involving a House subpoena for Charles Kupperman, a former national security aide to President Trump and deputy to former national security adviser, John Bolton.White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone called out House Democrats, and Rep. Adam B. Schiff in particular, for avoiding a court decision on a key witness in the impeachment inquiry. Cipollone was referring to a closely watched case involving a House subpoena for Charles Kupperman, a former national security aide to President Trump and deputy to former national security adviser, John Bolton.
Kupperman filed a novel lawsuit asking a federal judge in D.C. to decide whether he should comply with the subpoena or follow White House orders to defy it. House lawyers then made a strategic decision in November to withdraw the subpoena and asked the judge to dismiss the case.Kupperman filed a novel lawsuit asking a federal judge in D.C. to decide whether he should comply with the subpoena or follow White House orders to defy it. House lawyers then made a strategic decision in November to withdraw the subpoena and asked the judge to dismiss the case.
“They come here and ask you to do the work that they refused to do for themselves,” Cipollone said in response to Schiff’s call for the Senate to allow additional witness testimony. “They withdrew the subpoena. They evaded a decision.”“They come here and ask you to do the work that they refused to do for themselves,” Cipollone said in response to Schiff’s call for the Senate to allow additional witness testimony. “They withdrew the subpoena. They evaded a decision.”
House Democrats, concerned about likely delay from a lengthy judicial process, decided instead to move forward with an impeachment vote, and to look to the outcome of a separate case involving former White House counsel Donald McGahn.House Democrats, concerned about likely delay from a lengthy judicial process, decided instead to move forward with an impeachment vote, and to look to the outcome of a separate case involving former White House counsel Donald McGahn.
A federal appeals court in Washington could rule at any time on whether McGahn must comply with a Congressional subpoena.A federal appeals court in Washington could rule at any time on whether McGahn must comply with a Congressional subpoena.
In Kupperman’s case, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon dismissed the lawsuit after both the Justice Department and the House agreed that the legal dispute was no longer a live issue.In Kupperman’s case, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon dismissed the lawsuit after both the Justice Department and the House agreed that the legal dispute was no longer a live issue.
The president’s lawyers and the top Republican in the House took aim at Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, early in Tuesday’s proceedings, previewing their party’s line of attack during the trial.The president’s lawyers and the top Republican in the House took aim at Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, early in Tuesday’s proceedings, previewing their party’s line of attack during the trial.
White House counsel Pat Cipollone incorrectly claimed that Schiff did not allow Republicans into the closed-door impeachment depositions that were held late last year, even though lawmakers of both parties attended the depositions.White House counsel Pat Cipollone incorrectly claimed that Schiff did not allow Republicans into the closed-door impeachment depositions that were held late last year, even though lawmakers of both parties attended the depositions.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also blasted Schiff, tweeting a video of himself describing the California Democrat as “a modern-day Joe McCarthy.”House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also blasted Schiff, tweeting a video of himself describing the California Democrat as “a modern-day Joe McCarthy.”
Schiff has been a favorite target of Trump, who has sharply criticized the House Intelligence Committee chairman for delivering a parody of his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.Schiff has been a favorite target of Trump, who has sharply criticized the House Intelligence Committee chairman for delivering a parody of his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Most senators are taking notes, and each has their own favored way of doing it. Some senators have opted for yellow pads of paper to jot down their notes — this is the favored method of Sens. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)Most senators are taking notes, and each has their own favored way of doing it. Some senators have opted for yellow pads of paper to jot down their notes — this is the favored method of Sens. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)
Others, such as Sens. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) were taking notes in bound books instead.Others, such as Sens. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) were taking notes in bound books instead.
Reporters can only observe about two-thirds of the senators from any part of the press gallery. Of those visible, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) chose the tiniest note-taking medium: a series of official-looking bookmark-style cards, each about three inches wide.Reporters can only observe about two-thirds of the senators from any part of the press gallery. Of those visible, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) chose the tiniest note-taking medium: a series of official-looking bookmark-style cards, each about three inches wide.
But notebooks aren’t the only things covering the senators’ desks: Several also appear to have brought reference materials with them, most in three-ring binders.But notebooks aren’t the only things covering the senators’ desks: Several also appear to have brought reference materials with them, most in three-ring binders.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) had the fattest binder in view, while Senate leaders McConnell and Schumer had virtually nothing on their desks.Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) had the fattest binder in view, while Senate leaders McConnell and Schumer had virtually nothing on their desks.
Jay Sekulow, an outside attorney for Trump, began his floor remarks with several inaccurate statements.Jay Sekulow, an outside attorney for Trump, began his floor remarks with several inaccurate statements.
Sekulow incorrectly claimed that the report issued last year by former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III found “no obstruction” — when in actuality, Mueller declined to weigh in on the question of whether Trump obstructed justice, citing long-standing Justice Department precedent.Sekulow incorrectly claimed that the report issued last year by former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III found “no obstruction” — when in actuality, Mueller declined to weigh in on the question of whether Trump obstructed justice, citing long-standing Justice Department precedent.
Sekulow also claimed that the White House was not allowed to have a counsel present during the impeachment hearings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee. In fact, the White House was allowed to participate but declined to do so.Sekulow also claimed that the White House was not allowed to have a counsel present during the impeachment hearings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee. In fact, the White House was allowed to participate but declined to do so.
As he continued a lengthy argument against McConnell’s resolution, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, showed video clips of Trump in an attempt to turn the president’s own words against him.As he continued a lengthy argument against McConnell’s resolution, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, showed video clips of Trump in an attempt to turn the president’s own words against him.
In one clip shown to senators, Trump said that he would “love” to have several top officials testify, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.In one clip shown to senators, Trump said that he would “love” to have several top officials testify, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.
“The bluster of wanting these witnesses to testify is over,” Schiff said.“The bluster of wanting these witnesses to testify is over,” Schiff said.
He also showed a clip of Trump saying that Article II of the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president.”He also showed a clip of Trump saying that Article II of the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president.”
That was evidence, Schiff suggested, of Trump’s mind-set when it comes to preventing lawmakers from seeing documents relevant to his conduct toward Ukraine.That was evidence, Schiff suggested, of Trump’s mind-set when it comes to preventing lawmakers from seeing documents relevant to his conduct toward Ukraine.
“The trial should not reward the president’s obstruction,” Schiff said.“The trial should not reward the president’s obstruction,” Schiff said.
Amid his arguments against the resolution, Schiff also pressed the substance of the case against Trump, saying it was a grave abuse of power to have withheld congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.Amid his arguments against the resolution, Schiff also pressed the substance of the case against Trump, saying it was a grave abuse of power to have withheld congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.
About 45 minutes after the Senate trial began, Trump sent out a simple tweet in all caps: “READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!”About 45 minutes after the Senate trial began, Trump sent out a simple tweet in all caps: “READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!”
Trump has argued since the early days of the impeachment probe that the transcript of his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky absolves him of wrongdoing because he didn’t explicitly ask for a quid pro quo when he asked for an investigation into the Bidens.Trump has argued since the early days of the impeachment probe that the transcript of his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky absolves him of wrongdoing because he didn’t explicitly ask for a quid pro quo when he asked for an investigation into the Bidens.
Trump is at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where it is after 8 p.m.Trump is at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where it is after 8 p.m.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House impeachment manager, argued against McConnell’s organizing resolution, saying it needs to be changed to ensure that House managers can obtain documents relevant to Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine as well as relevant witnesses.Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House impeachment manager, argued against McConnell’s organizing resolution, saying it needs to be changed to ensure that House managers can obtain documents relevant to Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine as well as relevant witnesses.
In his remarks, Schiff said the vote on the resolution would be even more important than the vote senators will take on Trump’s guilt.In his remarks, Schiff said the vote on the resolution would be even more important than the vote senators will take on Trump’s guilt.
“I believe the most important decision in this case is the one you’ll make today,” he said. “Will the president and the American people get a fair trial?”“I believe the most important decision in this case is the one you’ll make today,” he said. “Will the president and the American people get a fair trial?”
Under McConnell’s resolution, decisions about documents and witnesses would be put off until after House managers and Trump’s lawyers make opening arguments and senators have an opportunity to ask questions of both sides.Under McConnell’s resolution, decisions about documents and witnesses would be put off until after House managers and Trump’s lawyers make opening arguments and senators have an opportunity to ask questions of both sides.
Schiff said that order makes no sense.Schiff said that order makes no sense.
Earlier in his remarks, Schiff said the impeachment charges against Trump are the most serious brought against any president.Earlier in his remarks, Schiff said the impeachment charges against Trump are the most serious brought against any president.
If the House proves its case, he said, senators will have to answer this question: “Does the commission of these high crimes and misdemeanors require the conviction and removal of the president?”If the House proves its case, he said, senators will have to answer this question: “Does the commission of these high crimes and misdemeanors require the conviction and removal of the president?”
“We believe it does,” he added.“We believe it does,” he added.
McConnell’s resolution setting terms for the trial was changed to relax the timetable for arguments and ease the admission of evidence, according to two Republican aides.McConnell’s resolution setting terms for the trial was changed to relax the timetable for arguments and ease the admission of evidence, according to two Republican aides.
The 24 hours of arguments from impeachment managers and the White House will now take place over three days instead of two, and evidence will be automatically admitted unless someone objects, the aides said.The 24 hours of arguments from impeachment managers and the White House will now take place over three days instead of two, and evidence will be automatically admitted unless someone objects, the aides said.
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a pivotal swing Republican vote on procedural matters, had raised concerns privately about both the evidence provisions and the truncated number of days that both the House impeachment managers and the president’s lawyers would have to argue their cases.Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a pivotal swing Republican vote on procedural matters, had raised concerns privately about both the evidence provisions and the truncated number of days that both the House impeachment managers and the president’s lawyers would have to argue their cases.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) was also among the Republican senators who argued during a party lunch Tuesday that the opening arguments should be stretched out over three days if it were to mirror the Clinton trial rules.Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) was also among the Republican senators who argued during a party lunch Tuesday that the opening arguments should be stretched out over three days if it were to mirror the Clinton trial rules.
In a brief opening statement, White House counsel Pat Cipollone cast the impeachment trial as “a fair process” and urged senators to support McConnell’s resolution.In a brief opening statement, White House counsel Pat Cipollone cast the impeachment trial as “a fair process” and urged senators to support McConnell’s resolution.
“We believe that once you hear those initial presentations, the only conclusion will be that the president has done absolutely nothing wrong and that these articles of impeachment do not begin to approach the standard required by the Constitution, and in fact they themselves will establish nothing beyond those articles,” Cipollone said.“We believe that once you hear those initial presentations, the only conclusion will be that the president has done absolutely nothing wrong and that these articles of impeachment do not begin to approach the standard required by the Constitution, and in fact they themselves will establish nothing beyond those articles,” Cipollone said.
“It is long past time to start this proceeding, and we are here today to do it,” he added, accusing Democrats of having delayed sending the articles to the Senate for 33 days.“It is long past time to start this proceeding, and we are here today to do it,” he added, accusing Democrats of having delayed sending the articles to the Senate for 33 days.
Cipollone made no mention of the letter sent earlier Tuesday in which the House impeachment managers suggested that he might have a conflict that should keep him from representing Trump in the trial.Cipollone made no mention of the letter sent earlier Tuesday in which the House impeachment managers suggested that he might have a conflict that should keep him from representing Trump in the trial.
The trial, preceded by moments of extreme partisan rancor, kicked off with some small gestures of comity.The trial, preceded by moments of extreme partisan rancor, kicked off with some small gestures of comity.
Members of the House prosecution team, including lawyers Norm Eisen, Barry Berke and Daniel Goldman, as well as House general counsel Doug Letter, crossed the Senate well to greet their trial counterparts on the White House prosecution team, led by White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone and outside lawyer Jay Sekulow.Members of the House prosecution team, including lawyers Norm Eisen, Barry Berke and Daniel Goldman, as well as House general counsel Doug Letter, crossed the Senate well to greet their trial counterparts on the White House prosecution team, led by White House counsel Pat A. Cipollone and outside lawyer Jay Sekulow.
The pleasantries extended, to a point, to the elected officials in the room. Cipollone and Sekulow heartily greeted Republican members of the Senate, including McConnell and other members of the GOP leadership team. And Cipollone, at one point, met eyes with Schumer and offered a brief greeting.The pleasantries extended, to a point, to the elected officials in the room. Cipollone and Sekulow heartily greeted Republican members of the Senate, including McConnell and other members of the GOP leadership team. And Cipollone, at one point, met eyes with Schumer and offered a brief greeting.
However, the House managers — including lead prosecutor Adam Schiff — stayed largely on their side of the well, milling around the cramped arc-shaped table mirrored across the aisle for the White House team.However, the House managers — including lead prosecutor Adam Schiff — stayed largely on their side of the well, milling around the cramped arc-shaped table mirrored across the aisle for the White House team.
About 20 minutes after the proceedings were set to begin, ushers brought a half-full Senate gallery to its feet as Roberts entered to begin the proceedings.About 20 minutes after the proceedings were set to begin, ushers brought a half-full Senate gallery to its feet as Roberts entered to begin the proceedings.
“The Senate will convene as a court of impeachment,” he said, and the senators took their seats for a long afternoon, evening, and possibly late night of debate.“The Senate will convene as a court of impeachment,” he said, and the senators took their seats for a long afternoon, evening, and possibly late night of debate.
Roberts, who is presiding over the Senate trial, began Tuesday’s proceedings by swearing in Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.).Roberts, who is presiding over the Senate trial, began Tuesday’s proceedings by swearing in Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.).
Inhofe missed last week’s swearing-in because he was in Oklahoma to be with a family member facing a medical issue.Inhofe missed last week’s swearing-in because he was in Oklahoma to be with a family member facing a medical issue.
“Do you solemnly swear that in all things appertaining to the impeachment of Donald John Trump, president of the United States, now pending, you will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help you God?” Roberts asked.“Do you solemnly swear that in all things appertaining to the impeachment of Donald John Trump, president of the United States, now pending, you will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help you God?” Roberts asked.
“I do,” Inhofe replied.“I do,” Inhofe replied.
The White House dismissed concerns raised Tuesday by House impeachment managers about White House counsel Pat Cipollone representing Trump in the Senate trial given that he witnessed some of the conduct at issue.The White House dismissed concerns raised Tuesday by House impeachment managers about White House counsel Pat Cipollone representing Trump in the Senate trial given that he witnessed some of the conduct at issue.
“The Democrats are an utter joke — they have no case, and this latest political stunt proves it,” said White House spokesman Hogan Gidley.“The Democrats are an utter joke — they have no case, and this latest political stunt proves it,” said White House spokesman Hogan Gidley.
In a letter earlier Tuesday, the managers said that Cipollone should disclose “all facts and information as to which you have firsthand knowledge that will be at issue in connection with evidence you present or arguments you make in your role as the President’s legal advocate.”In a letter earlier Tuesday, the managers said that Cipollone should disclose “all facts and information as to which you have firsthand knowledge that will be at issue in connection with evidence you present or arguments you make in your role as the President’s legal advocate.”
“The idea that the counsel to the president has to turn over protected documents and confidential information is ludicrous, and to imply he can’t represent the president of the United States in an impeachment proceeding is completely absurd,” Gidley said.“The idea that the counsel to the president has to turn over protected documents and confidential information is ludicrous, and to imply he can’t represent the president of the United States in an impeachment proceeding is completely absurd,” Gidley said.
In floor remarks Tuesday afternoon, Schumer sharply criticized the restrictions on reporters covering the Senate proceedings, contending that while some may not want the events of the trial to become public, “we do.”In floor remarks Tuesday afternoon, Schumer sharply criticized the restrictions on reporters covering the Senate proceedings, contending that while some may not want the events of the trial to become public, “we do.”
“The press is here to inform the American people about these pivotal events in American history,” Schumer said.“The press is here to inform the American people about these pivotal events in American history,” Schumer said.
He reiterated that Democrats will put forward amendments and took aim at McConnell for pushing an expedited timeline for the trial that Schumer said “will result in a rushed trial with little evidence in the dark of night — literally in the dark of night.”He reiterated that Democrats will put forward amendments and took aim at McConnell for pushing an expedited timeline for the trial that Schumer said “will result in a rushed trial with little evidence in the dark of night — literally in the dark of night.”
“We are staring down an erosion of the sacred democratic principles for which our founders fought a bloody war of independence. … The McConnell rules seem to be designed by President Trump for President Trump,” the Senate minority leader said. “It asks the Senate to rush through as fast as possible and makes getting evidence as hard as possible.”“We are staring down an erosion of the sacred democratic principles for which our founders fought a bloody war of independence. … The McConnell rules seem to be designed by President Trump for President Trump,” the Senate minority leader said. “It asks the Senate to rush through as fast as possible and makes getting evidence as hard as possible.”
In remarks on the Senate floor before the trial resumed, McConnell defended his organizing resolution as “straightforward” and “imminently fair” and said he would resist any amendments.In remarks on the Senate floor before the trial resumed, McConnell defended his organizing resolution as “straightforward” and “imminently fair” and said he would resist any amendments.
He chided House Democrats for “agitating” to hear additional witnesses in the Senate trial, arguing that they could have sought through the courts to compel them to testify in the House impeachment proceedings.He chided House Democrats for “agitating” to hear additional witnesses in the Senate trial, arguing that they could have sought through the courts to compel them to testify in the House impeachment proceedings.
“Nobody will dictate procedure to United States senators,” McConnell said.“Nobody will dictate procedure to United States senators,” McConnell said.
McConnell reiterated his view that senators should not decide about hearing witnesses and admitting documents until after they have heard opening arguments from the House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers, and have had an opportunity to ask questions of both sides.McConnell reiterated his view that senators should not decide about hearing witnesses and admitting documents until after they have heard opening arguments from the House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers, and have had an opportunity to ask questions of both sides.
“The Senate will decide those questions later in the trial,” McConnell said.“The Senate will decide those questions later in the trial,” McConnell said.
In a 32-page response, House Democrats dismissed Trump’s impeachment trial brief, arguing that the president’s filing is “heavy on rhetoric and procedural grievances, but entirely lacks a legitimate defense of his misconduct.”In a 32-page response, House Democrats dismissed Trump’s impeachment trial brief, arguing that the president’s filing is “heavy on rhetoric and procedural grievances, but entirely lacks a legitimate defense of his misconduct.”
“It is clear from his response that President Trump would rather discuss anything other than what he actually did,” the House impeachment managers wrote in their response.“It is clear from his response that President Trump would rather discuss anything other than what he actually did,” the House impeachment managers wrote in their response.
Trump’s “view that he cannot be held accountable, except in an election he seeks to fix in his favor,” underscores the need for the Senate to remove him from office, the managers wrote.Trump’s “view that he cannot be held accountable, except in an election he seeks to fix in his favor,” underscores the need for the Senate to remove him from office, the managers wrote.
They argued that a failure to convict the president would have dire consequences for democratic governance.They argued that a failure to convict the president would have dire consequences for democratic governance.
“If the Senate does not convict and remove President Trump, he will have succeeded in placing himself above the law,” they wrote. “Each Senator should set aside partisanship and politics and hold President Trump accountable to protect our national security and democracy.”“If the Senate does not convict and remove President Trump, he will have succeeded in placing himself above the law,” they wrote. “Each Senator should set aside partisanship and politics and hold President Trump accountable to protect our national security and democracy.”
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) pushed back Tuesday on concerns raised by House managers about White House counsel Pat Cipollone serving as a Trump attorney during the impeachment trial given that he had witnessed some of the conduct at issue.Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) pushed back Tuesday on concerns raised by House managers about White House counsel Pat Cipollone serving as a Trump attorney during the impeachment trial given that he had witnessed some of the conduct at issue.
The White House counsel works for the office of the president and is not one of Trump’s personal attorneys.The White House counsel works for the office of the president and is not one of Trump’s personal attorneys.
“Democrats’ opening salvo in impeachment: they demand Trump get rid of his lawyer, Pat Cipollone,” Cruz said in the first of several tweets. “Absurd request. Unlike the House, the Senate will have a FAIR trial. That means we won’t deny the President his lawyer ON THE DAY the trial starts. The Sixth Amendment provides the accused the right ‘to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.’”“Democrats’ opening salvo in impeachment: they demand Trump get rid of his lawyer, Pat Cipollone,” Cruz said in the first of several tweets. “Absurd request. Unlike the House, the Senate will have a FAIR trial. That means we won’t deny the President his lawyer ON THE DAY the trial starts. The Sixth Amendment provides the accused the right ‘to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.’”
Amid the partisan uproar over the trial rules proposed Monday by McConnell, senators might never actually debate them. That’s because they can’t, under Senate rules for impeachment trials, unless the Senate votes to deliberate in closed session.Amid the partisan uproar over the trial rules proposed Monday by McConnell, senators might never actually debate them. That’s because they can’t, under Senate rules for impeachment trials, unless the Senate votes to deliberate in closed session.
A top Senate Republican, GOP Conference Chairman John Barrasso (Wyo.), said Tuesday that he would oppose any such move — signaling that Republicans are not willing to negotiate any changes to the McConnell rules.A top Senate Republican, GOP Conference Chairman John Barrasso (Wyo.), said Tuesday that he would oppose any such move — signaling that Republicans are not willing to negotiate any changes to the McConnell rules.
“I have no interest at all in going into private session,” he said in a brief interview, adding that he thought Schumer would use any closed session to further the Democratic “coverup” narrative. “Senator Schumer had plenty of chances to negotiate in the last month and a half. … He had plenty of time, refused to do it, and it doesn’t sound like he is interested at all in coming to some fair and open process.”“I have no interest at all in going into private session,” he said in a brief interview, adding that he thought Schumer would use any closed session to further the Democratic “coverup” narrative. “Senator Schumer had plenty of chances to negotiate in the last month and a half. … He had plenty of time, refused to do it, and it doesn’t sound like he is interested at all in coming to some fair and open process.”
Going into a closed session would mean the cameras would go off and the press would be barred. It could occur if a partisan fight over changing the resolution drafted by McConnell potentially drags on late into the night and senators need to discuss in private how to resolve the impasse, according to Democratic and Republican aides.Going into a closed session would mean the cameras would go off and the press would be barred. It could occur if a partisan fight over changing the resolution drafted by McConnell potentially drags on late into the night and senators need to discuss in private how to resolve the impasse, according to Democratic and Republican aides.
Schumer is planning on offering amendments to the resolution, but Democrats have not indicated exactly how many votes they would try to force.Schumer is planning on offering amendments to the resolution, but Democrats have not indicated exactly how many votes they would try to force.
When the Senate convenes Tuesday afternoon, the arguments over the rules will be presented by Trump’s lawyers and the House impeachment managers. Senators are required to remain silent.When the Senate convenes Tuesday afternoon, the arguments over the rules will be presented by Trump’s lawyers and the House impeachment managers. Senators are required to remain silent.
Schumer said he will offer amendments to the resolution on trial rules proposed by McConnell “to fix its many flaws.”Schumer said he will offer amendments to the resolution on trial rules proposed by McConnell “to fix its many flaws.”
Speaking at a news conference with fellow Democrats, the Senate minority leader said he will start with an amendment to subpoena documents regarding Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine and subsequent amendments on calling witnesses.Speaking at a news conference with fellow Democrats, the Senate minority leader said he will start with an amendment to subpoena documents regarding Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine and subsequent amendments on calling witnesses.
He said the documents are equally important as the witnesses and could shed light on the circumstances under which military aid to Ukraine was withheld.He said the documents are equally important as the witnesses and could shed light on the circumstances under which military aid to Ukraine was withheld.
“No one can argue that these documents are not directly related to the charges against President Trump,” Schumer said.“No one can argue that these documents are not directly related to the charges against President Trump,” Schumer said.
With his amendments, Republicans will face a choice “right off the bat,” he said.With his amendments, Republicans will face a choice “right off the bat,” he said.
“This is a historic moment,” he said. “The eyes of America are watching. Republican senators must rise to the occasion.”“This is a historic moment,” he said. “The eyes of America are watching. Republican senators must rise to the occasion.”
Most Americans want the Senate to call witnesses, but they are split on whether White House officials should be compelled to testify.Most Americans want the Senate to call witnesses, but they are split on whether White House officials should be compelled to testify.
More than 75 percent of those polled by Monmouth University support the calling of witnesses, but only 51 percent say administration officials who defied subpoenas to testify in the House hearings should be forced to testify in the Senate, and even fewer — 40 percent — say Trump should be compelled to appear.More than 75 percent of those polled by Monmouth University support the calling of witnesses, but only 51 percent say administration officials who defied subpoenas to testify in the House hearings should be forced to testify in the Senate, and even fewer — 40 percent — say Trump should be compelled to appear.
Americans are also split over whether the House managers should be allowed to present new evidence during the trial, with a slight majority of 57 percent supporting doing so, and 34 percent saying their arguments should be limited to what was discovered in their initial probe.Americans are also split over whether the House managers should be allowed to present new evidence during the trial, with a slight majority of 57 percent supporting doing so, and 34 percent saying their arguments should be limited to what was discovered in their initial probe.
Despite Trump’s impeachment, his approval ratings have remained stagnant, hovering at 40 to 44 percent in Monmouth’s polling over the past year. This most recent poll has him at 43 percent.Despite Trump’s impeachment, his approval ratings have remained stagnant, hovering at 40 to 44 percent in Monmouth’s polling over the past year. This most recent poll has him at 43 percent.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman and lead impeachment manager, continued the Democratic broadside against proposed Senate rules governing the impeachment trial in remarks to reporters Tuesday.Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman and lead impeachment manager, continued the Democratic broadside against proposed Senate rules governing the impeachment trial in remarks to reporters Tuesday.
The rules McConnell released Monday evening and a lack of witnesses would make it “impossible to have a fair trial,” Schiff said. “Not just difficult, but impossible.”The rules McConnell released Monday evening and a lack of witnesses would make it “impossible to have a fair trial,” Schiff said. “Not just difficult, but impossible.”
Flanked by the six other impeachment managers, Schiff said the proposed rules do not live up to McConnell’s own standard of following the precedent established in the 1999 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.Flanked by the six other impeachment managers, Schiff said the proposed rules do not live up to McConnell’s own standard of following the precedent established in the 1999 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.
While the House record was incorporated into the Clinton trial at its outset, under McConnell’s proposal for the Trump trial, the Senate must vote to include it after opening arguments — a “profound departure” from the Clinton precedent, Schiff said.While the House record was incorporated into the Clinton trial at its outset, under McConnell’s proposal for the Trump trial, the Senate must vote to include it after opening arguments — a “profound departure” from the Clinton precedent, Schiff said.
“We can see why this resolution was kept from us and the American people” until late Monday, Schiff said. “This is nothing like the process in the Clinton trial.”“We can see why this resolution was kept from us and the American people” until late Monday, Schiff said. “This is nothing like the process in the Clinton trial.”
When it comes to Trump’s trial, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) suggested Tuesday that some Democratic presidential candidates may join Republicans in seeking “to get it done as quickly as possible.”When it comes to Trump’s trial, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) suggested Tuesday that some Democratic presidential candidates may join Republicans in seeking “to get it done as quickly as possible.”
Four senators running for the Democratic nomination are sitting as jurors in the trial, meaning their time on the campaign trail will be largely curtailed ahead of the first nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire.Four senators running for the Democratic nomination are sitting as jurors in the trial, meaning their time on the campaign trail will be largely curtailed ahead of the first nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Cornyn made his comments during an interview on Fox News in which he also pushed back on claims by Democrats that a speedy trial amounts to a coverup of Trump’s conduct.Cornyn made his comments during an interview on Fox News in which he also pushed back on claims by Democrats that a speedy trial amounts to a coverup of Trump’s conduct.
“It strikes me that they’re a little nervous,” Cornyn said.“It strikes me that they’re a little nervous,” Cornyn said.
Democrats intent on unseating Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine want to make the Senate impeachment trial as much an indictment of her as it is of Trump.Democrats intent on unseating Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine want to make the Senate impeachment trial as much an indictment of her as it is of Trump.
With the trial beginning in earnest Tuesday, an activist group plans to broadcast videos of Collins on a billboard truck outside the Capitol contrasting her comments during the 1999 Clinton impeachment trial and today, particularly regarding whether to call witnesses.With the trial beginning in earnest Tuesday, an activist group plans to broadcast videos of Collins on a billboard truck outside the Capitol contrasting her comments during the 1999 Clinton impeachment trial and today, particularly regarding whether to call witnesses.
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee created a website called “What Changed Susan?” to highlight her comments in favor of needing more evidence then vs. now.The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee created a website called “What Changed Susan?” to highlight her comments in favor of needing more evidence then vs. now.
Collins, a moderate Republican in a state that leans Democratic, is in the most difficult reelection battle of her career. Maine is a state Republicans are eager to hold as they defend seats in Arizona, Colorado and North Carolina, and it’s one Democrats would need to flip to take over the Senate.Collins, a moderate Republican in a state that leans Democratic, is in the most difficult reelection battle of her career. Maine is a state Republicans are eager to hold as they defend seats in Arizona, Colorado and North Carolina, and it’s one Democrats would need to flip to take over the Senate.
Read more here.Read more here.
In a letter Tuesday to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, the House impeachment managers suggested he may have a conflict that should keep him from representing Trump in the Senate trial.In a letter Tuesday to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, the House impeachment managers suggested he may have a conflict that should keep him from representing Trump in the Senate trial.
The House managers noted several instances in which it appeared that Cipollone was aware of Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine for which the president has been impeached.The House managers noted several instances in which it appeared that Cipollone was aware of Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine for which the president has been impeached.
“In light of your extensive knowledge of these key events, your personal representation of President Trump threatens to undermine the integrity of the pending trial,” the managers said. “You may be a material witness to the charges against President Trump even though you are also his advocate.”“In light of your extensive knowledge of these key events, your personal representation of President Trump threatens to undermine the integrity of the pending trial,” the managers said. “You may be a material witness to the charges against President Trump even though you are also his advocate.”
The managers, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), said that at a minimum, Cipollone should disclose “all facts and information as to which you have firsthand knowledge that will be at issue in connection with evidence you present or arguments you make in your role as the President’s legal advocate.”The managers, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), said that at a minimum, Cipollone should disclose “all facts and information as to which you have firsthand knowledge that will be at issue in connection with evidence you present or arguments you make in your role as the President’s legal advocate.”
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), one of the House members aiding Trump’s legal team, predicted Tuesday that there will be no witnesses in the Senate trial.Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), one of the House members aiding Trump’s legal team, predicted Tuesday that there will be no witnesses in the Senate trial.
Ratcliffe argued during an appearance on Fox News that the House impeachment proceedings were so flawed that new witnesses would not “inject fairness” into the process.Ratcliffe argued during an appearance on Fox News that the House impeachment proceedings were so flawed that new witnesses would not “inject fairness” into the process.
“I don’t think there are going to be any witnesses called,” Ratcliffe said. “The Senate isn’t going to be able to fix what happened in the House.”“I don’t think there are going to be any witnesses called,” Ratcliffe said. “The Senate isn’t going to be able to fix what happened in the House.”
How Mitch McConnell’s proposed Senate trial will workHow Mitch McConnell’s proposed Senate trial will work
Ratcliffe also did not rule out that he and other House members helping Trump’s legal team could make arguments on the floor. While the plan is for them not to appear, “you never know what’s going to happen during a trial,” he said.Ratcliffe also did not rule out that he and other House members helping Trump’s legal team could make arguments on the floor. While the plan is for them not to appear, “you never know what’s going to happen during a trial,” he said.
After delivering a speech to the gathering, Trump was holding a bilateral meeting with the new European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, when a reporter shouted a question about a potential motion to dismiss in the impeachment trial.After delivering a speech to the gathering, Trump was holding a bilateral meeting with the new European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, when a reporter shouted a question about a potential motion to dismiss in the impeachment trial.
“That whole thing is a hoax,” Trump replied. “It goes nowhere because nothing happened. The only thing we’ve done is a great job. … That whole thing is a total hoax, so I’m sure it’s going to work out fine.”“That whole thing is a hoax,” Trump replied. “It goes nowhere because nothing happened. The only thing we’ve done is a great job. … That whole thing is a total hoax, so I’m sure it’s going to work out fine.”
The seven House impeachment managers issued a statement Tuesday calling on the Senate to reject McConnell’s proposed trial rules, saying it could produce “no trial at all.”The seven House impeachment managers issued a statement Tuesday calling on the Senate to reject McConnell’s proposed trial rules, saying it could produce “no trial at all.”
“The McConnell Resolution goes so far as to suggest it may not even allow the evidence gathered by the House to be admitted,” the statement said. “That is not a fair trial. In fact, it is no trial at all.”“The McConnell Resolution goes so far as to suggest it may not even allow the evidence gathered by the House to be admitted,” the statement said. “That is not a fair trial. In fact, it is no trial at all.”
The House managers also decried what they characterized as a “White House-driven and rigged process, with a truncated schedule designed to go late into the night and further conceal the President’s misconduct.”The House managers also decried what they characterized as a “White House-driven and rigged process, with a truncated schedule designed to go late into the night and further conceal the President’s misconduct.”
“There should be a fair trial — fair to the President, yes, but equally important, fair to the American people. Any Senator who wants the same, should reject the McConnell Resolution,” the managers said.“There should be a fair trial — fair to the President, yes, but equally important, fair to the American people. Any Senator who wants the same, should reject the McConnell Resolution,” the managers said.
The managers are Reps. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Val Demings (D-Fla.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Sylvia Garcia (D-Tex.).The managers are Reps. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Val Demings (D-Fla.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Sylvia Garcia (D-Tex.).
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) blasted McConnell’s proposed resolution on trial rules, saying it calls for an “absurdly compressed schedule” that amounts to “a cover-up for the President.”House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) blasted McConnell’s proposed resolution on trial rules, saying it calls for an “absurdly compressed schedule” that amounts to “a cover-up for the President.”
“Leader McConnell’s process is deliberately designed to hide the truth from the Senate and from the American people, because he knows that the President’s wrongdoing is indefensible and demands removal,” Pelosi said in a statement. “No jury would be asked to operate on McConnell’s absurdly compressed schedule, and it is obvious that no Senator who votes for it is intending to truly weigh the damning evidence of the President’s attacks on our Constitution.”“Leader McConnell’s process is deliberately designed to hide the truth from the Senate and from the American people, because he knows that the President’s wrongdoing is indefensible and demands removal,” Pelosi said in a statement. “No jury would be asked to operate on McConnell’s absurdly compressed schedule, and it is obvious that no Senator who votes for it is intending to truly weigh the damning evidence of the President’s attacks on our Constitution.”
Pelosi also accused McConnell of repeatedly lying in recent weeks when he said the rules for the Trump impeachment trial would mirror those for the trial of President Bill Clinton in 1999.Pelosi also accused McConnell of repeatedly lying in recent weeks when he said the rules for the Trump impeachment trial would mirror those for the trial of President Bill Clinton in 1999.
“For weeks, he has insisted that he will adhere to the rules used during the Clinton impeachment trial and that ‘fair is fair’ — but his proposal rejects the need for witnesses and documents during the trial itself,” Pelosi said. “In contrast, for the Clinton trial, witnesses were deposed and the President provided more than 90,000 documents.”“For weeks, he has insisted that he will adhere to the rules used during the Clinton impeachment trial and that ‘fair is fair’ — but his proposal rejects the need for witnesses and documents during the trial itself,” Pelosi said. “In contrast, for the Clinton trial, witnesses were deposed and the President provided more than 90,000 documents.”
McConnell has proposed decisions about witnesses and documents be put off until after senators hear opening arguments and have an opportunity to present questions to both sides.McConnell has proposed decisions about witnesses and documents be put off until after senators hear opening arguments and have an opportunity to present questions to both sides.
Schumer took issue Tuesday with McConnell’s plan for opening arguments to be compressed into two days, asserting that would lead to arguments being presented well into the night, when few Americans are watching.Schumer took issue Tuesday with McConnell’s plan for opening arguments to be compressed into two days, asserting that would lead to arguments being presented well into the night, when few Americans are watching.
“His resolution creates a trial that is rushed, with as little evidence as possible and done in the dark of night,” Schumer said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Why are they trying to do things at 2 in the morning? … If their case is so strong, why are they afraid to present it in the light of day?”“His resolution creates a trial that is rushed, with as little evidence as possible and done in the dark of night,” Schumer said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Why are they trying to do things at 2 in the morning? … If their case is so strong, why are they afraid to present it in the light of day?”
More broadly, Schumer accused McConnell of “totally, totally, totally going along with Trump’s coverup, hook, line and sinker.”More broadly, Schumer accused McConnell of “totally, totally, totally going along with Trump’s coverup, hook, line and sinker.”
He argued that a “farce” of a trial would embolden Trump and future presidents to engage in more misconduct.He argued that a “farce” of a trial would embolden Trump and future presidents to engage in more misconduct.
“I worry about what this president will do in the next 10 months and what future presidents will do,” Schumer said. “This is very serious stuff, and to not have a fair trial is wrong.”“I worry about what this president will do in the next 10 months and what future presidents will do,” Schumer said. “This is very serious stuff, and to not have a fair trial is wrong.”
Senators are girding for a spirited arguments from both sides over the rules that will guide Trump’s historic impeachment trial after it resumes at 1 p.m.Senators are girding for a spirited arguments from both sides over the rules that will guide Trump’s historic impeachment trial after it resumes at 1 p.m.
McConnell’s organizing resolution, which he circulated late Monday afternoon, offers each side 24 hours to make its opening arguments, starting on Wednesday but compressed into two session days.McConnell’s organizing resolution, which he circulated late Monday afternoon, offers each side 24 hours to make its opening arguments, starting on Wednesday but compressed into two session days.
Under McConnell’s proposal, senators will be allowed 16 hours to question the opposing sides after House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers make their cases.Under McConnell’s proposal, senators will be allowed 16 hours to question the opposing sides after House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers make their cases.
After that, the sides will debate for a maximum of four hours on whether to consider subpoenaing witnesses or documents at all, followed by a vote on whether to do so. If a majority of senators agree, then there will probably be motions from both sides to call various witnesses, with subsequent votes on issuing subpoenas.After that, the sides will debate for a maximum of four hours on whether to consider subpoenaing witnesses or documents at all, followed by a vote on whether to do so. If a majority of senators agree, then there will probably be motions from both sides to call various witnesses, with subsequent votes on issuing subpoenas.
On Tuesday afternoon, Schumer is expected to move to amend the rule package to allow for witnesses and documents at the front end of the trial. On Monday, he called McConnell’s proposal “a national disgrace.”On Tuesday afternoon, Schumer is expected to move to amend the rule package to allow for witnesses and documents at the front end of the trial. On Monday, he called McConnell’s proposal “a national disgrace.”
A simple majority of senators — 51 votes — is needed to approve the resolution and other motions in the Republican-controlled Chamber.A simple majority of senators — 51 votes — is needed to approve the resolution and other motions in the Republican-controlled Chamber.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), one of the seven House impeachment managers, pushed back in an interview broadcast Tuesday against Republicans’ suggestions that Hunter Biden should be called as a witness in the impeachment trial.Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), one of the seven House impeachment managers, pushed back in an interview broadcast Tuesday against Republicans’ suggestions that Hunter Biden should be called as a witness in the impeachment trial.
Some GOP senators have suggested if Democrats get to call witnesses they want — including former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney — Republicans should be able to call the Bidens. Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian energy company while his father was vice president.Some GOP senators have suggested if Democrats get to call witnesses they want — including former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney — Republicans should be able to call the Bidens. Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian energy company while his father was vice president.
“Hunter Biden … can’t tell us anything about whether the president withheld military aid, whether he withheld that aid to coerce Ukraine to conduct political investigations or why he wouldn’t meet with the president of Ukraine,” Schiff told CBS. “The only purpose in putting him on their list is they wish to trade material witnesses like Mr. Bolton and Mulvaney and others for other ones that will allow them to continue to attack a political opponent. That’s an illegitimate abuse of the trial.”“Hunter Biden … can’t tell us anything about whether the president withheld military aid, whether he withheld that aid to coerce Ukraine to conduct political investigations or why he wouldn’t meet with the president of Ukraine,” Schiff told CBS. “The only purpose in putting him on their list is they wish to trade material witnesses like Mr. Bolton and Mulvaney and others for other ones that will allow them to continue to attack a political opponent. That’s an illegitimate abuse of the trial.”
The White House announced late Monday that eight of the president’s most ardent House Republican defenders would join the impeachment team in an adjunct capacity to “help expeditiously end this brazen political vendetta.”The White House announced late Monday that eight of the president’s most ardent House Republican defenders would join the impeachment team in an adjunct capacity to “help expeditiously end this brazen political vendetta.”
One of them, Rep. Douglas A. Collins (Ga.), went on the offense Tuesday morning against Democrats, claiming their characterization of McConnell’s proposed trial rules as a “coverup” amounts to the “height of a temper tantrum.”One of them, Rep. Douglas A. Collins (Ga.), went on the offense Tuesday morning against Democrats, claiming their characterization of McConnell’s proposed trial rules as a “coverup” amounts to the “height of a temper tantrum.”
During an appearance on Fox News, Collins also argued that Democrats are primarily interested in imposing “the stain” of impeachment on Trump to aid their fortunes in the November election.During an appearance on Fox News, Collins also argued that Democrats are primarily interested in imposing “the stain” of impeachment on Trump to aid their fortunes in the November election.
“They’re talking about it more as a political stain,” Collins aid.“They’re talking about it more as a political stain,” Collins aid.
The other GOP lawmakers aiding Trump are Reps. Mike Johnson (La.), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Debbie Lesko (Ariz.), Mark Meadows (N.C.), John Ratcliffe (Tex.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) and Lee Zeldin (N.Y.).The other GOP lawmakers aiding Trump are Reps. Mike Johnson (La.), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Debbie Lesko (Ariz.), Mark Meadows (N.C.), John Ratcliffe (Tex.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) and Lee Zeldin (N.Y.).
Here are the lawyers defending Trump in the Senate trialHere are the lawyers defending Trump in the Senate trial
“Throughout this process, these Members of Congress have provided guidance to the White House team, which was prohibited from participating in the proceedings concocted by Democrats in the House of Representatives,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement.“Throughout this process, these Members of Congress have provided guidance to the White House team, which was prohibited from participating in the proceedings concocted by Democrats in the House of Representatives,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement.
The House asked Trump to participate, but he declined to have lawyers represent him in impeachment proceedings before the House Judiciary Committee.The House asked Trump to participate, but he declined to have lawyers represent him in impeachment proceedings before the House Judiciary Committee.
DAVOS, Switzerland — Trump trumpeted what he called “America’s extraordinary prosperity” on his watch, taking credit for a soaring stock market, low unemployment, and a “blue collar boom” in jobs and income, in a presidential turn on the world stage also meant to make impeachment proceedings in Washington look small.DAVOS, Switzerland — Trump trumpeted what he called “America’s extraordinary prosperity” on his watch, taking credit for a soaring stock market, low unemployment, and a “blue collar boom” in jobs and income, in a presidential turn on the world stage also meant to make impeachment proceedings in Washington look small.
Trump ran through economic statistics with a salesman’s delivery, crowing about growth during his three years in office that he said bested his predecessors and defied his skeptics.Trump ran through economic statistics with a salesman’s delivery, crowing about growth during his three years in office that he said bested his predecessors and defied his skeptics.
“America is thriving, America is flourishing, and yes, America is winning again like never before,” Trump told an audience of billionaires, world leaders and figures from academia, the media and the kind of international organizations and think tanks for whom Trump’s “America First” nationalism is anathema.“America is thriving, America is flourishing, and yes, America is winning again like never before,” Trump told an audience of billionaires, world leaders and figures from academia, the media and the kind of international organizations and think tanks for whom Trump’s “America First” nationalism is anathema.
Trump is making his second visit to the World Economic Forum, which for its 50th anniversary this year is focusing on climate change and sustainability. A sign at the entrance to the press center notes that paint for this year’s installation was made from seaweed, and carpets from recycled fishing nets. The Trump administration is withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate agreement.Trump is making his second visit to the World Economic Forum, which for its 50th anniversary this year is focusing on climate change and sustainability. A sign at the entrance to the press center notes that paint for this year’s installation was made from seaweed, and carpets from recycled fishing nets. The Trump administration is withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate agreement.
Read more here.Read more here.
Those infuriating framers of the Constitution left behind only the thinnest inkling of their real thoughts about impeachment of the president and said nothing explicit about whether removal from office requires commission of a crime. Almost all the law professors who have researched the matter have concluded that the answer is no — no crime necessary.Those infuriating framers of the Constitution left behind only the thinnest inkling of their real thoughts about impeachment of the president and said nothing explicit about whether removal from office requires commission of a crime. Almost all the law professors who have researched the matter have concluded that the answer is no — no crime necessary.
It’s been the overwhelming consensus, impeachment scholar Philip C. Bobbitt of Columbia Law School told The Washington Post on Monday. And among those who accepted it was Alan Dershowitz, the fabled defense lawyer, now Harvard Law School professor emeritus and part of Trump’s impeachment defense team.It’s been the overwhelming consensus, impeachment scholar Philip C. Bobbitt of Columbia Law School told The Washington Post on Monday. And among those who accepted it was Alan Dershowitz, the fabled defense lawyer, now Harvard Law School professor emeritus and part of Trump’s impeachment defense team.
“It certainly doesn’t have to be a crime,” he said in a television interview in 1998, during the impeachment controversy surrounding President Bill Clinton. “If you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of the president and abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don’t need a technical crime.”“It certainly doesn’t have to be a crime,” he said in a television interview in 1998, during the impeachment controversy surrounding President Bill Clinton. “If you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of the president and abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don’t need a technical crime.”
Now, he has a different view. “Without a crime, there can be no impeachment,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, foreshadowing the formal brief presented Monday by Trump’s legal team to the Senate.Now, he has a different view. “Without a crime, there can be no impeachment,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, foreshadowing the formal brief presented Monday by Trump’s legal team to the Senate.
Then he got into one of his famous verbal brawls on CNN on Monday night. Host Anderson Cooper and the network’s chief legal analyst, Jeffrey Toobin, confronted Dershowitz about his changed opinion. The resulting exchange wasn’t pretty.Then he got into one of his famous verbal brawls on CNN on Monday night. Host Anderson Cooper and the network’s chief legal analyst, Jeffrey Toobin, confronted Dershowitz about his changed opinion. The resulting exchange wasn’t pretty.
Read more here.Read more here.
Sixty-nine percent of Americans say that Trump’s impeachment trial should include testimony from new witnesses who did not testify in the House impeachment inquiry, according to a poll for CNN conducted by SSRS.Sixty-nine percent of Americans say that Trump’s impeachment trial should include testimony from new witnesses who did not testify in the House impeachment inquiry, according to a poll for CNN conducted by SSRS.
Democrats are pressing for testimony from several witnesses who declined to take part in the House proceedings, including former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.Democrats are pressing for testimony from several witnesses who declined to take part in the House proceedings, including former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.
The CNN poll found that Republicans are divided on that prospect: 48 percent say they want new witnesses, while 44 percent say they do not.The CNN poll found that Republicans are divided on that prospect: 48 percent say they want new witnesses, while 44 percent say they do not.