This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/northern_ireland/foyle_and_west/8088936.stm
The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Real IRA chief to blame for Omagh | Real IRA chief to blame for Omagh |
(20 minutes later) | |
Real IRA leader Michael McKevitt was responsible for the 1998 Omagh bomb, a judge has found. | Real IRA leader Michael McKevitt was responsible for the 1998 Omagh bomb, a judge has found. |
Mr Justice Morgan made the ruling after a landmark civil case brought by some of the families of the victims of the atrocity. | Mr Justice Morgan made the ruling after a landmark civil case brought by some of the families of the victims of the atrocity. |
Liam Campbell, Colm Murphy, and Seamus Daly - were also found liable for the attack. Seamus McKenna was cleared. | |
The 12 relatives were awarded more than £1.6m in damages for the attack in which 29 people and unborn twins died. | |
Mr Justice Morgan also found dissident republican organisation the Real IRA liable for the bomb. | |
No-one has ever been convicted in a criminal court of causing the deaths. | |
The only man to face criminal charges over the Omagh killings, 38-year-old Sean Hoey from Jonesborough in South Armagh, was acquitted in 2007. | |
The families brought the multi-million pound action in an attempt to bring fresh information about the atrocity to light. | |
Civil cases have a much lower burden of proof, with the judge reaching his verdict on the balance of probabilities. In criminal law, guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. | Civil cases have a much lower burden of proof, with the judge reaching his verdict on the balance of probabilities. In criminal law, guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. |
Vincent Kearney, NI Home Affairs correspondent None of the men being sued has the capacity to pay out any kind of large-scale payment. | Vincent Kearney, NI Home Affairs correspondent None of the men being sued has the capacity to pay out any kind of large-scale payment. |
From the start the families made clear the civil action was a vehicle for putting as much information as possible into the public domain about the bombing and the men they claim were involved. | From the start the families made clear the civil action was a vehicle for putting as much information as possible into the public domain about the bombing and the men they claim were involved. |
It is not a criminal case and no-one will be jailed. Case that broke new legal ground Omagh families' harrowing ordeal | It is not a criminal case and no-one will be jailed. Case that broke new legal ground Omagh families' harrowing ordeal |
In an unprecedented step, the hearing was relocated from Belfast to the Supreme Court in Dublin in May so that evidence could be heard from Irish police officers. | In an unprecedented step, the hearing was relocated from Belfast to the Supreme Court in Dublin in May so that evidence could be heard from Irish police officers. |
It was the first time a judge from Northern Ireland had travelled to the Republic of Ireland on official business. | It was the first time a judge from Northern Ireland had travelled to the Republic of Ireland on official business. |
The case was also the first time that the British government had helped to fund a civil action. | The case was also the first time that the British government had helped to fund a civil action. |
In 2003 it contributed £800,000 towards the £1.5m needed to launch the action. | In 2003 it contributed £800,000 towards the £1.5m needed to launch the action. |
THE MEN SUED BY THE OMAGH FAMILIES | THE MEN SUED BY THE OMAGH FAMILIES |
In 2008 two of the respondents lodged an appeal against exceptional legal aid being granted to the victims' families. | In 2008 two of the respondents lodged an appeal against exceptional legal aid being granted to the victims' families. |
They said a public pledge of financial assistance to the families ahead of any legal authorisation was predetermining the outcome of the legal process. | They said a public pledge of financial assistance to the families ahead of any legal authorisation was predetermining the outcome of the legal process. |
But the Court of Appeal ruled it could not be assumed the government had abandoned its fair and independent judgement. | But the Court of Appeal ruled it could not be assumed the government had abandoned its fair and independent judgement. |