This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/manchester/8290669.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Freed child rapist attacks again Freed child rapist attacks again
(about 2 hours later)
A judge has been criticised for allowing a 16-year-old rapist to walk free, eight days before he sexually assaulted a five-year-old boy.A judge has been criticised for allowing a 16-year-old rapist to walk free, eight days before he sexually assaulted a five-year-old boy.
Judge Adrian Smith only gave the youth a community order for raping a boy, seven, in Tameside, Greater Manchester.Judge Adrian Smith only gave the youth a community order for raping a boy, seven, in Tameside, Greater Manchester.
He considered the victim's family, who forgave the attacker because of their Christian beliefs, when sentencing.He considered the victim's family, who forgave the attacker because of their Christian beliefs, when sentencing.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has lodged an appeal against the sentence on the grounds it was too lenient.The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has lodged an appeal against the sentence on the grounds it was too lenient.
We appealed two days after he received his sentence, unfortunately he committed another assault eight days later Crown Prosecution Service
A CPS spokesman said: "It is rare to lodge these kind of sentence appeals with the attorney general, but we felt very strongly about this case.A CPS spokesman said: "It is rare to lodge these kind of sentence appeals with the attorney general, but we felt very strongly about this case.
"We appealed two days after he received his sentence, unfortunately he committed another assault eight days later."We appealed two days after he received his sentence, unfortunately he committed another assault eight days later.
We have backed the CPS in their appeal and we are now waiting to hear back from the attorney general Greater Manchester Police spokesman
"The judge did use the feelings of the victim's family as a mitigating factor.""The judge did use the feelings of the victim's family as a mitigating factor."
The rapist, who cannot be identified, has now been remanded in custody.The rapist, who cannot be identified, has now been remanded in custody.
He committed the first attack in June 2008.He committed the first attack in June 2008.
A year later, on 28 June 2009, he appeared in Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court before Judge Smith and was given only a three-year community order, despite the objections of the CPS and police.A year later, on 28 June 2009, he appeared in Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court before Judge Smith and was given only a three-year community order, despite the objections of the CPS and police.
Attorney general
Then, on 4 July, he abducted and raped a five-year-old boy.Then, on 4 July, he abducted and raped a five-year-old boy.
He appeared at the same court on Thursday and admitted his latest offences of rape, kidnap with intent to commit a sexual offence and attempt to rape.He appeared at the same court on Thursday and admitted his latest offences of rape, kidnap with intent to commit a sexual offence and attempt to rape.
The youth is due to be sentenced on 11 November.The youth is due to be sentenced on 11 November.
A police spokesman said: "We have backed the CPS in their appeal and we are now waiting to hear back from the attorney general."A police spokesman said: "We have backed the CPS in their appeal and we are now waiting to hear back from the attorney general."
The appeal is used by the CPS on occasions when they believe the sentence given falls below the guidelines.The appeal is used by the CPS on occasions when they believe the sentence given falls below the guidelines.
A spokeswoman from the Judicial Communications Office said it did not comment on sentences given by judges.A spokeswoman from the Judicial Communications Office said it did not comment on sentences given by judges.