This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/science-environment-14447187

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Fossil 'suggests plesiosaurs did not lay eggs' Fossil 'suggests plesiosaurs did not lay eggs'
(about 3 hours later)
Scientists say they have found the first evidence that giant sea reptiles - which lived at the same time as dinosaurs - gave birth to live young rather than laying eggs.Scientists say they have found the first evidence that giant sea reptiles - which lived at the same time as dinosaurs - gave birth to live young rather than laying eggs.
They say a 78 million-year-old fossil of a pregnant plesiosaur suggests they gave birth to single, large young.They say a 78 million-year-old fossil of a pregnant plesiosaur suggests they gave birth to single, large young.
Writing in Science, they say this also suggests a degree of parental care.Writing in Science, they say this also suggests a degree of parental care.
The fossil, the first of a pregnant plesiosaur found, is at the US's Los Angeles County Natural History. The fossil, the first of a pregnant plesiosaur found, is at the US's Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History.
After being excavated from a ranch in Kansas, US, the 5m-long fossil skeleton Polycotylus latippinus lay for two decades in the basement of the Los Angeles County museum waiting to be chiselled from its rocky casing. After being excavated from a ranch in Kansas, US, the 5m-long fossil skeleton Polycotylus latippinus lay for two decades in the basement of the Los Angeles museum waiting to be chiselled from its rocky casing.
Immature skeletonImmature skeleton
Two years ago when researchers began to piece the bones together they quickly realised that they were in fact dealing with two separate animals; an adult plesiosaur and a smaller juvenile.Two years ago when researchers began to piece the bones together they quickly realised that they were in fact dealing with two separate animals; an adult plesiosaur and a smaller juvenile.
The study's authors report that the juvenile was unlikely to have been eaten by the larger reptile because its tiny bones showed no evidence of bite marks, and its soft, immature skeleton suggested an animal only two-thirds of the way through its development.The study's authors report that the juvenile was unlikely to have been eaten by the larger reptile because its tiny bones showed no evidence of bite marks, and its soft, immature skeleton suggested an animal only two-thirds of the way through its development.
For more than 200 years palaeontologists have speculated about how these colossal cretaceous animals reproduced. For more than 200 years palaeontologists have speculated about how these colossal Cretaceous animals reproduced.
Many believed the plesiosaur was too cumbersome to drag itself up the beach to lay eggs, and so must have given birth to live young.Many believed the plesiosaur was too cumbersome to drag itself up the beach to lay eggs, and so must have given birth to live young.
"[The find] provides the first direct evidence for live birth in plesiosaur," said palaeontologist Adam Smith from the Thinktank Centre, Birmingham Science Museum."[The find] provides the first direct evidence for live birth in plesiosaur," said palaeontologist Adam Smith from the Thinktank Centre, Birmingham Science Museum.
"It's a very interesting find...[and] has been a long time coming.""It's a very interesting find...[and] has been a long time coming."
Doting parents?Doting parents?
"The lack of fossil evidence of a pregnant plesiosaur was frustrating," explained the study's lead author Frank O'Keefe, from Marshall University in Huntington, US."The lack of fossil evidence of a pregnant plesiosaur was frustrating," explained the study's lead author Frank O'Keefe, from Marshall University in Huntington, US.
But he added: "What is really surprising about this fossil [is] that plesiosaur [reproduces] differently to other marine reptiles... they give birth to one big baby instead of a lot of little babies." But he added: "What is really surprising about this fossil [is] that plesiosaurs [reproduce] differently to other marine reptiles... they give birth to one big baby instead of a lot of little babies."
By making comparisons with modern animals, such as whales, which give birth to larger, single young and then go on to care for them, Dr O'Keefe and his colleague, Luis Chiappe from the museum, attempt to infer something about plesiosaur behaviour.By making comparisons with modern animals, such as whales, which give birth to larger, single young and then go on to care for them, Dr O'Keefe and his colleague, Luis Chiappe from the museum, attempt to infer something about plesiosaur behaviour.
In a similar way to land-dwelling dinosaurs, which are thought to have provided food for their nest-bound young, plesiosaurs, the authors suggest, might have been doting parents.In a similar way to land-dwelling dinosaurs, which are thought to have provided food for their nest-bound young, plesiosaurs, the authors suggest, might have been doting parents.
But Dr Smith was less convinced. He said that it was "certainly quite possible... but is very speculative".But Dr Smith was less convinced. He said that it was "certainly quite possible... but is very speculative".
P. latippinus's close relatives, the nothosaur-grade sauropterygian, had three young at one time. It is possible the P. latippinus evolved to have only one, and care for it, he told BBC News, but more pregnant specimens are needed to be more certain of this. P. latippinus's close relatives had three young at one time. It is possible the P. latippinus evolved to have only one, and care for it, he told BBC News, but more pregnant specimens are needed to be more certain of this.
Dr O'Keefe agreed, explaining that unlike on land where nests are preserved, studying the behaviour of ancient marine creatures is very difficult.Dr O'Keefe agreed, explaining that unlike on land where nests are preserved, studying the behaviour of ancient marine creatures is very difficult.
"When you get right down to it, behaviour doesn't fossilize, so we are stuck trying make these inferences using modern animals where we can observe their behaviour," he explained. "When you get right down to it, behaviour doesn't fossilise, so we are stuck trying to make these inferences using modern animals where we can observe their behaviour," he explained.