This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-england-london-17436313

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Businessmen in High Court battle over top London hotels Businessmen in High Court battle over top London hotels
(about 1 hour later)
Three leading businessmen are in a High Court battle over the control of three of London's most famous hotels.Three leading businessmen are in a High Court battle over the control of three of London's most famous hotels.
Paddy McKillen, from Belfast, wants to block a "takeover plan" by twins Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay.Paddy McKillen, from Belfast, wants to block a "takeover plan" by twins Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay.
All three entrepreneurs invested in Coroin, the company which owns the Connaught, Claridges and the Berkeley.All three entrepreneurs invested in Coroin, the company which owns the Connaught, Claridges and the Berkeley.
Mr McKillen claims that "company affairs" have been conducted in a "manner unfairly prejudicial to his interests" and wants damages. Mr McKillen claims "company affairs" have been conducted in a "manner unfairly prejudicial to his interests" and wants damages.
Lawyers began outlining evidence to judge Mr Justice David Richards at the start of a High Court trial in London on Monday. The Barclay brothers deny Mr McKillen's allegations.
The Barclay brothers, who grew up in London, are contesting Mr McKillen's claims at a hearing expected to end next month. In written arguments given to the judge, Mr Justice David Richards, at the High Court in London, Philip Marshall QC, for Mr McKillen, said the Coroin company was set up in 2004 to buy hotels.
He said Mr McKillen was a director and "substantial shareholder".
Mr Marshall said the shareholders' relationship was based on "trust and confidence" and an agreement contained "express obligations of good faith".
'Complete control'
Mr McKillen had been the "most active" shareholder and had overseen "developments" which had been a "success", said Mr Marshall.
The value of "the hotels" had increased from £530m to £985m over six years and Coroin was worth more than £1bn, he added.
Mr Marshall said the Barclay brothers were "well known businessmen" whose interests also included London hotels the Ritz and Cavendish.
He said the Barclay brothers had made attempts to obtain "complete control" of Coroin and used "various tactics" which involved "infringements" of Mr McKillen's rights under a shareholders' agreement.
Mr McKillen contended that he had been a victim of "unlawfulness" and "unfairly prejudicial conduct", he said.
"Both Sir Frederick and Sir David deny the allegations against them," said Lord Grabiner QC, for the Barclay brothers, in written submissions given to the judge.
"It is clear that these serious allegations have been made for tactical reasons, to try to embarrass Sir Frederick and Sir David and to tarnish their reputations."
Lord Grabiner added: "What Mr McKillen does not want or like is that he may be squeezed out of Coroin because he cannot afford to stay in (pay the sums required to put Coroin on a sound financial footing).
"Sir Frederick and Sir David cannot be held responsible for this.
"It is a fact of life that if you want to be a shareholder of a company with a value approaching £1bn, but you have no money, you are likely to lose out in the end."
He said what the Barclay brothers had done was "lawful" and "certainly intended and believed to be lawful".
The hearing is expected to end next month.