This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6903403.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Afghanistan 'needs more Nato aid' Afghanistan 'needs more Nato aid'
(about 4 hours later)
Nato must commit more troops and aid to Afghanistan if it is to establish a stable democracy, MPs have said.Nato must commit more troops and aid to Afghanistan if it is to establish a stable democracy, MPs have said.
The Commons defence committee said it was "deeply concerned" that some member countries were reluctant to contribute.The Commons defence committee said it was "deeply concerned" that some member countries were reluctant to contribute.
It said the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) was still two battalions short of the requirement set by Nato commanders.It said the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) was still two battalions short of the requirement set by Nato commanders.
The government agreed that challenges in Afghanistan were "considerably greater" than some admitted.The government agreed that challenges in Afghanistan were "considerably greater" than some admitted.
'Exaggerated''Exaggerated'
Nato's chief spokesman, James Apparthurai, said forces on the ground had nearly all the resources they needed.Nato's chief spokesman, James Apparthurai, said forces on the ground had nearly all the resources they needed.
He told BBC Radio 5 Live: "We're two battalions short and we'll keep asking for those.He told BBC Radio 5 Live: "We're two battalions short and we'll keep asking for those.
It is alarming that concerns are still being voiced over the lack of a unified strategy Nick Harvey, Lib DemsIt is alarming that concerns are still being voiced over the lack of a unified strategy Nick Harvey, Lib Dems
"But I think it's worth pointing out that Afghanistan is a huge country and the idea is not to just keep pouring more troops into it - that's been done in the past, that's not the way it will work.""But I think it's worth pointing out that Afghanistan is a huge country and the idea is not to just keep pouring more troops into it - that's been done in the past, that's not the way it will work."
In a report, the committee said some Nato members were continuing to impose restrictions on where their troops could operate. In its report, the committee said some Nato members were continuing to impose restrictions on where their troops could operate.
While Isaf currently has almost 37,000 troops in Afghanistan, a far larger force - backed by increased development aid - was needed to stabilise the country, it added.While Isaf currently has almost 37,000 troops in Afghanistan, a far larger force - backed by increased development aid - was needed to stabilise the country, it added.
The report said: "We remain deeply concerned that the reluctance of some Nato members to provide troops for the Isaf mission is undermining Nato's credibility and also Isaf operations."The report said: "We remain deeply concerned that the reluctance of some Nato members to provide troops for the Isaf mission is undermining Nato's credibility and also Isaf operations."
James Arbuthnot, the committee's chairman, said Nato countries all had their own national reasons for not giving the same levels of commitment.James Arbuthnot, the committee's chairman, said Nato countries all had their own national reasons for not giving the same levels of commitment.
He added: "The fear that we have as a result of this is that this deployment itself is at risk of failing, and if this deployment fails then Nato's existence is under threat."He added: "The fear that we have as a result of this is that this deployment itself is at risk of failing, and if this deployment fails then Nato's existence is under threat."
The committee also warned that Nato appeared to be falling behind the Taleban in the "information campaign".The committee also warned that Nato appeared to be falling behind the Taleban in the "information campaign".
It warned that "exaggerated" claims of enemy casualties risked handing a propaganda weapon to insurgents.It warned that "exaggerated" claims of enemy casualties risked handing a propaganda weapon to insurgents.
Meanwhile, civilian casualties caused by Isaf were undermining support for the Nato mission and the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai and fuelling the insurgency.Meanwhile, civilian casualties caused by Isaf were undermining support for the Nato mission and the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai and fuelling the insurgency.
The committee said that, while progress had been made in training units of the Afghan National Army working with Isaf, they were still "some way off operating independently".The committee said that, while progress had been made in training units of the Afghan National Army working with Isaf, they were still "some way off operating independently".
'Shortfalls''Shortfalls'
The report said British forces - predominantly operating in the troubled Helmand province - still needed more helicopters and that the present level of helicopter operations was "not sustainable at the present intensity". The report said British forces - predominantly operating in the troubled Helmand province - still needed more helicopters and that the level of helicopter operations was "not sustainable at the present intensity".
Defence Secretary Des Browne welcomed what he described as a balanced report.Defence Secretary Des Browne welcomed what he described as a balanced report.
He added: "I agree with the committee's assessment that Nato nations should do more to meet the shortfalls in requirements."He added: "I agree with the committee's assessment that Nato nations should do more to meet the shortfalls in requirements."
But shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said it was "a severe indictment of the government's handling of the situation in Afghanistan".But shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said it was "a severe indictment of the government's handling of the situation in Afghanistan".
Liberal Democrat defence spokesman Nick Harvey said: ""This is an operation that Nato can ill-afford to lose and yet co-ordination between international actors remains poor."Liberal Democrat defence spokesman Nick Harvey said: ""This is an operation that Nato can ill-afford to lose and yet co-ordination between international actors remains poor."