This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/dec/23/rolls-royce-sfo-bribery-corruption-investigation-indonesia

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Rolls-Royce: SFO launches formal bribery and corruption investigation Rolls-Royce: SFO launches formal bribery and corruption investigation
(about 7 hours later)
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has opened a formal criminal investigation into allegations that aerospace and defence group Rolls-Royce bribed the son of Indonesia's former president with $20m (£13m) and a blue Rolls-Royce car. The Serious Fraud Office has opened a formal criminal investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption at aircraft engine maker Rolls-Royce.
The SFO said on Monday that its director, David Green, has "opened a criminal investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption at Rolls-Royce". The aerospace and defence company has been under the spotlight since late 2012, when the company said the SFO had approached it about allegations of malpractice in Indonesia and China, prompting Rolls-Royce to commission an independent investigation that turned up "matters of concern".
The British aircraft engine maker is accused of bribing Tommy Suharto, the son of Indonesia's late president, General Suharto, over several years in the 80s and 90s in order to persuade the national airline, Garuda, to order Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. Details of the allegations soon broke into the open through a whistleblower, who claimed that the world's second largest jet engine manufacturer had bribed Tommy Suharto, son of Indonesia's former president General Suharto, with $20m (£13m) and a blue Rolls-Royce car.
Tommy Suharto denies the allegations, which were made by former Rolls employee Dick Taylor in a series of online comments. The SFO said on Monday that its director, David Green, had decided to step up its probe and had "opened a criminal investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption at Rolls-Royce". The move comes in the same month that the SFO suffered another reversal, following a number of failed inquiries and trials, when it abandoned the corruption trial of British-Canadian billionaire Victor Dahdaleh.
The Suharto allegations were made by former Rolls-Royce employee Dick Taylor in a series of online comments. The Derby-based company is accused of paying bribes in the 1980s and 1990s in order to persuade the national airline, Garuda, to order Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines.
Lawyers for Suharto, who was convicted of ordering the murder of a judge who tried him on separate corruption charges in 2000, said: "He [Suharto] did not, and has never, received monies or a car from Rolls-Royce and nor did he recommend their engines to Garuda, as alleged."Lawyers for Suharto, who was convicted of ordering the murder of a judge who tried him on separate corruption charges in 2000, said: "He [Suharto] did not, and has never, received monies or a car from Rolls-Royce and nor did he recommend their engines to Garuda, as alleged."
Rolls appointed Lord Gold, a former City lawyer and Tory party peer, to investigate the "slush fund" allegations. The inquiry also uncovered concerns about Rolls' dealings in China, which were also been passed on to the SFO. Taylor, who worked for Rolls for more than 30 years, including a stint in Indonesia, turned whistleblower after the company ignored concerns he raised internally.
The company declined to comment on why it chose to release the news of the SFO's formal investigation two days before Christmas. "Further to our announcement of 6 December 2012 relating to concerns about bribery and corruption in overseas markets, we have been informed by the Serious Fraud Office that it has now commenced a formal investigation into these matters," the company said in a statement on Monday morning. After taking early retirement, Taylor said he decided to "tell the truth", and since 2006 has been posting comments below Rolls-Royce articles on newspaper websites around the world, including the Guardian's website.
The SFO said the timing of the release was decided by Rolls, not the SFO. The agency said: "We confirm that the director of the Serious Fraud Office has opened a criminal investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption at Rolls-Royce." Rolls-Royce appointed law firm Debevoise & Plimpton to investigate allegations made by Taylor that the company maintained a "secret slush fund". The inquiry uncovered concerns about the company's dealings in China, which have been passed to the SFO.
It is understood that Rolls had been trying to avoid a formal SFO investigation by offering to settle the matter by paying a multimillion pound fine. In order to demonstrate that it took the allegations seriously, in January Rolls-Royce appointed Lord Gold, a former City lawyer and Tory party peer, to review its anti-bribery and compliance procedures. He has yet to formally report back to the company's board.
The launch of a criminal investigation could prove embarrassing for the prime minister and the royal family, who have spoken of their pride for the Derby-based company. In a statement on Monday Rolls-Royce said: "Further to our announcement of 6 December 2012 relating to concerns about bribery and corruption in overseas markets, we have been informed by the Serious Fraud Office that it has now commenced a formal investigation into these matters."
Cameron has praised Rolls as a company "of which the whole country can be proud", and the Duke of Cambridge has described Rolls as "one of the United Kingdom's great global companies". The SFO said the timing of the release two days before Christmas was decided by Rolls-Royce, not the agency.
Rolls' chief executive, John Rishton, has told investors that neither he nor the company board would tolerate "improper business conduct of any sort". It has been reported that the company had been trying to avoid a formal SFO investigation by offering to pay a multimillion-pound fine.
Earlier this year, Mark King, head of Rolls' aerospace division, resigned just four months after being promoted to president of aerospace, the division beset by the allegations. An investigation could prove embarrassing for the prime minister and royal family, who have spoken of their pride in one of Britain's best-known companies.
Rolls did not explain why King, a 27-year company veteran, was leaving. The company refused to state whether his departure was linked to the investigation, stating only that King was leaving for "personal reasons". David Cameron has praised Rolls as an enterprise "of which the whole country can be proud", and the Duke of Cambridge has described it as "one of the United Kingdom's great global companies".
Last year, Rolls-Royce's chief executive, John Rishton, stressed that the company would not tolerate illegal conduct. He said: "I want to make it crystal clear that neither I nor the board will tolerate improper business conduct of any sort and will take all necessary action to ensure compliance."
Earlier this year, Mark King, head of Rolls's aerospace division, resigned just four months after being promoted to president of aerospace, the division beset by the allegations.
Rolls did not explain why King, a 27-year company veteran, was leaving. The company refused to state whether his departure was linked to the investigation, stating only that he was leaving for "personal reasons".
Nick Cunningham, an analyst at Agency Partners, said the criminal investigation "can be very serious for individuals involved and they tend to result in cultural change in companies. If you look at the financial cost of the fines, they are rarely very large." He said that even if Rolls were found guilty it would "have very little impact" on the company's financial performance.Nick Cunningham, an analyst at Agency Partners, said the criminal investigation "can be very serious for individuals involved and they tend to result in cultural change in companies. If you look at the financial cost of the fines, they are rarely very large." He said that even if Rolls were found guilty it would "have very little impact" on the company's financial performance.
Barry Vitou, partner and white-collar crime expert at law firm Pinsent Masons, said: "The SFO are making good on threats to investigate allegations of serious fraud. The Rolls-Royce story has been in the news for over a year but the news that the SFO has formally opened an investigation underscores its resolve to actively take on big cases. Businesses should take note: the SFO will be keen to deliver results after recent losses."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.