This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25784726

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
King Alfred the Great 'find': Is this the new Richard III? King Alfred the Great 'find': Is this the new Richard III?
(25 days later)
After academics said they may have identified a piece of pelvis belonging to King Alfred the Great, comparisons were drawn to the discovery of Richard III. But what are the differences between the finds and why do they fascinate so many?After academics said they may have identified a piece of pelvis belonging to King Alfred the Great, comparisons were drawn to the discovery of Richard III. But what are the differences between the finds and why do they fascinate so many?
At first, it seemed almost fanciful.At first, it seemed almost fanciful.
A skeleton found beneath a Leicester car park was said to be that of Richard III.A skeleton found beneath a Leicester car park was said to be that of Richard III.
But after a painstaking excavation in 2012, DNA evidence proved beyond "reasonable doubt" the bones matched descendants of the monarch's family.But after a painstaking excavation in 2012, DNA evidence proved beyond "reasonable doubt" the bones matched descendants of the monarch's family.
On Friday, the University of Winchester said it may have found bones belonging to King Alfred the Great or his son, Edward the Elder.On Friday, the University of Winchester said it may have found bones belonging to King Alfred the Great or his son, Edward the Elder.
It could be some time, however, before any certainty can be attached to the latest announcement.It could be some time, however, before any certainty can be attached to the latest announcement.
Dr Katie Tucker, whose examination of the bones will feature in a BBC documentary, accepts it will be more difficult to prove a royal link.Dr Katie Tucker, whose examination of the bones will feature in a BBC documentary, accepts it will be more difficult to prove a royal link.
For one, Alfred the Great died in 899, well before Richard III was killed on the battlefield in 1485.For one, Alfred the Great died in 899, well before Richard III was killed on the battlefield in 1485.
"We have had quite a number of individuals who have been contacting us, sending us their family trees, saying they are descendants of Alfred," Dr Tucker said."We have had quite a number of individuals who have been contacting us, sending us their family trees, saying they are descendants of Alfred," Dr Tucker said.
"This is a path that may be worth pursuing but it's a very long way to go back, an extra 500 years to go back than Richard III. It's always going to be more of a difficult task to find a descendant.""This is a path that may be worth pursuing but it's a very long way to go back, an extra 500 years to go back than Richard III. It's always going to be more of a difficult task to find a descendant."
Dr Hugh Willmott, senior lecturer in Archaeology at the University of Sheffield, said he was "most intrigued" as to how the Alfred the Great connection could be proven.Dr Hugh Willmott, senior lecturer in Archaeology at the University of Sheffield, said he was "most intrigued" as to how the Alfred the Great connection could be proven.
"He died 1,114 years ago," he said. "His body has been moved at least twice in the past. All that moving around could cause problems."He died 1,114 years ago," he said. "His body has been moved at least twice in the past. All that moving around could cause problems.
Dr Willmott said the coverage of the Richard III find had generated lots of interest in archaeology.Dr Willmott said the coverage of the Richard III find had generated lots of interest in archaeology.
"The impact was very significant in the short term, particularly since Time Team ended as there hasn't been so much archaeology on television."The impact was very significant in the short term, particularly since Time Team ended as there hasn't been so much archaeology on television.
"On the flip side it's a bit disappointing if all the focus is on finding specific figures rather than trying to provide more context about the significance of historical events.""On the flip side it's a bit disappointing if all the focus is on finding specific figures rather than trying to provide more context about the significance of historical events."
There is also, he adds, a "finite number of kings".There is also, he adds, a "finite number of kings".
Richard Buckley, co-director of the University of Leicester's archaeology services, led the search for Richard III. Richard Buckley, co-director of the University of Leicester's archaeology services, led the dig for Richard III.
He said the discovery provoked so much interest because of the Shakespeare play based on Richard III and the fact he was a "very controversial character who polarises opinion".He said the discovery provoked so much interest because of the Shakespeare play based on Richard III and the fact he was a "very controversial character who polarises opinion".
"People also love a mystery, and the thought that he may be underneath a car park drew people in.""People also love a mystery, and the thought that he may be underneath a car park drew people in."
Professor Philip Schwyzer, of the University of Exeter's English department, said the excitement surrounding the remains was different from the "contemporary fascination with the Royal family"Professor Philip Schwyzer, of the University of Exeter's English department, said the excitement surrounding the remains was different from the "contemporary fascination with the Royal family"
He said: "Richard III is notorious and Alfred is celebrated in a much more positive way.He said: "Richard III is notorious and Alfred is celebrated in a much more positive way.
"There's a sense that they both belong to us and that we all should have a say over what happens to them.""There's a sense that they both belong to us and that we all should have a say over what happens to them."