This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/kent/7520598.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Terror police detain disabled boy Terror police detain disabled boy
(about 20 hours later)
A police officer has been transferred from duties at a Channel crossing after a disabled child and his parents were detained under the Terrorism Act. A police force has apologised after a disabled child and his parents claimed they were detained at a Channel crossing point under the Terrorism Act.
Julie Maynard, of Ware, Hertfordshire, was taking a day trip to Calais through the Channel Tunnel in Folkestone, Kent.Julie Maynard, of Ware, Hertfordshire, was taking a day trip to Calais through the Channel Tunnel in Folkestone, Kent.
The detective constable accused Ms Maynard and her husband Leslie Coombs of trafficking her son Joshua, 12.The detective constable accused Ms Maynard and her husband Leslie Coombs of trafficking her son Joshua, 12.
Kent Police apologised and described the incident as inappropriate, unprofessional and lacking in tact.Kent Police apologised and described the incident as inappropriate, unprofessional and lacking in tact.
The family were stopped by the plain clothes officer from the Channel Tunnel Policing Unit on 20 February. The family was stopped by plain clothes officer from the Channel Tunnel Policing Unit on 20 February.
'Car surrounded' I wish to reassure you that your highly unsatisfactory experience was a very isolated incident Insp Helen Shaw
Ms Maynard, a legal advocate, said the officer, who failed to identify who she was, asked for the family's passports then asked "who's the boy?". Ms Maynard, a legal advocate, said the officer, who failed to identify who she was, asked for the family's passports then asked "who's the boy?"
"My son is mixed race and the officer then told us, 'I believe you are child trafficking'," she said. "My son is mixed race and the officer then told us, 'I believe you are child trafficking'."
When Ms Maynard asked the woman officer if she would be asked the same question if her son was white, she said the officer replied: "Are you accusing me of being a racist?"When Ms Maynard asked the woman officer if she would be asked the same question if her son was white, she said the officer replied: "Are you accusing me of being a racist?"
The family were then detained under the Terrorism Act and surrounded by "at least 10 police officers" who ordered them to get out of their car. She claimed the family were then told they were being detained under the Terrorism Act and said they were surrounded by "at least 10 police officers" who ordered them to get out of their car.
Ms Maynard was separated from her husband and son, who is autistic and has cerebral palsy, and taken to a detention room for questioning, leaving Joshua distressed. 'Frightening experience'
Ms Maynard was separated from her husband and son, who is autistic and has cerebral palsy, and taken to a detention room for questioning.
Ms Maynard said the woman officer told her: "It's obvious he [Joshua] has nothing to do with you".Ms Maynard said the woman officer told her: "It's obvious he [Joshua] has nothing to do with you".
Police apology
She said officers had told the family they had powers to hold them for up to nine hours under Section 7 of the Terrorism Act, but they were released after more than two hours.She said officers had told the family they had powers to hold them for up to nine hours under Section 7 of the Terrorism Act, but they were released after more than two hours.
Mr Coombs said it was an "unpleasant and frightening experience".Mr Coombs said it was an "unpleasant and frightening experience".
Julie Maynard said: "More and more people are being stopped under the Terrorism Act - there's absolutely nothing in the act to stop individual officers abusing their powers. Ms Maynard said: "More and more people are being stopped under the Terrorism Act - there's absolutely nothing in the act to stop individual officers abusing their powers.
"They have a difficult job to do in a difficult climate but their approach needs to be reasonable and not presumptive that every person is somehow guilty of a possible terrorism or criminal offence.""They have a difficult job to do in a difficult climate but their approach needs to be reasonable and not presumptive that every person is somehow guilty of a possible terrorism or criminal offence."
Kent Police have paid a "substantial sum" of money to the welfare fund at Joshua's school, reimbursed the family's ferry fare and offered Joshua a visit to the Kent police marine launch. Police apology
Kent Police said neither the couple nor the boy were placed under arrest or detained under the Terrorism Act.
The force said in a statement: "Our officer spoke to a white couple with a child of mixed race.
"There were three names on the passport and the officer made inquiries to check the child was leaving the country legally.
"The parents made a complaint for which we have apologised."
The force added that the officer in question no longer works at the Channel crossing and was in another post but the move was not connected to the incident.
Insp Helen Shaw, from Kent Police's Frontier Operations, apologised to the family in a letter.Insp Helen Shaw, from Kent Police's Frontier Operations, apologised to the family in a letter.
In another letter she wrote: "Your complaint and my subsequent enquiries allowed me to identify that her (the officer's) manner had been insensitive, lacking in tact and that her conduct overall lacked the professionalism I expect.In another letter she wrote: "Your complaint and my subsequent enquiries allowed me to identify that her (the officer's) manner had been insensitive, lacking in tact and that her conduct overall lacked the professionalism I expect.
"I wish to reassure you that your highly unsatisfactory experience was a very isolated incident.""I wish to reassure you that your highly unsatisfactory experience was a very isolated incident."