This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-33969640
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Ancient underwater plant 'could be world's first flower' | Ancient underwater plant 'could be world's first flower' |
(4 days later) | |
Botanists in the US say an ancient plant that grew underwater in what is modern day Europe may have been the world's first known flowering plant. | Botanists in the US say an ancient plant that grew underwater in what is modern day Europe may have been the world's first known flowering plant. |
Researchers studied more than 1,000 fossils of the Montsechia vidalii species as part of the study. | |
The plant resembled a pond-weed but bore fruit containing a single seed - the defining characteristic of a flowering plant. | The plant resembled a pond-weed but bore fruit containing a single seed - the defining characteristic of a flowering plant. |
The scientists say it grew in Spanish lakes more than 125 million years ago. | The scientists say it grew in Spanish lakes more than 125 million years ago. |
"A 'first flower' is technically a myth, like the 'first human'," botanist David Dilcher says in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. | "A 'first flower' is technically a myth, like the 'first human'," botanist David Dilcher says in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. |
"But based on this new analysis, we know now that Montsechia is contemporaneous, if not more ancient, than Archaefructus," a similar aquatic plant found in China. | "But based on this new analysis, we know now that Montsechia is contemporaneous, if not more ancient, than Archaefructus," a similar aquatic plant found in China. |
Scientists have known about the Montsechia vidalii species for a long time. | |
Its fossils were first discovered more than a century ago in the limestone deposits of the Iberian Range in central Spain and in the Montsec Range of the Pyrenees. | Its fossils were first discovered more than a century ago in the limestone deposits of the Iberian Range in central Spain and in the Montsec Range of the Pyrenees. |
But Mr Dilcher said many of the fossils were misinterpreted, because Montsechia "possesses no obvious 'flower parts' such as petals or nectar-producing structures for attracting insects". | But Mr Dilcher said many of the fossils were misinterpreted, because Montsechia "possesses no obvious 'flower parts' such as petals or nectar-producing structures for attracting insects". |
Previous version
1
Next version