This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33985615

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Dreamliner 787 Heathrow fire 'may be caused by short circuit' Dreamliner 787 Heathrow fire 'probably caused by short circuit'
(about 2 hours later)
A fire on a parked Boeing 787 Dreamliner jet at Heathrow Airport two years ago was probably caused by a short circuit, air accident investigators have said.A fire on a parked Boeing 787 Dreamliner jet at Heathrow Airport two years ago was probably caused by a short circuit, air accident investigators have said.
The fire was likely to have been started by two bare wires touching in a piece of location equipment, the UK Air Accidents Investigations Branch said.The fire was likely to have been started by two bare wires touching in a piece of location equipment, the UK Air Accidents Investigations Branch said.
It then spread through the cabin and burnt through the fuselage.It then spread through the cabin and burnt through the fuselage.
Investigators recommended tighter testing and certification of devices.Investigators recommended tighter testing and certification of devices.
The fire on the Ethiopian Airlines Dreamliner closed down Heathrow for nearly 90 minutes on 12 July 2013.The fire on the Ethiopian Airlines Dreamliner closed down Heathrow for nearly 90 minutes on 12 July 2013.
The piece of equipment that caught fire - the Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) - was located near the back of the plane, and was made by Honeywell, investigators said.The piece of equipment that caught fire - the Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) - was located near the back of the plane, and was made by Honeywell, investigators said.
The battery-powered transmitter is designed to detect unusual deceleration, such as the force produced by a crash, and to transmit a distress signal.The battery-powered transmitter is designed to detect unusual deceleration, such as the force produced by a crash, and to transmit a distress signal.
The device in the 787 had positive and negative cables that were too long to fit into the box housing the device, and so ended up touching one another.The device in the 787 had positive and negative cables that were too long to fit into the box housing the device, and so ended up touching one another.
Testing had predicted that the worst reaction from a short circuit would be the batteries running down.Testing had predicted that the worst reaction from a short circuit would be the batteries running down.
Unfortunately, what actually happened was what investigators called "a thermal runaway" - a fire that spread from one battery cell to the next.Unfortunately, what actually happened was what investigators called "a thermal runaway" - a fire that spread from one battery cell to the next.
On the ground, the skin of the aircraft was pierced by the heat and the flames.On the ground, the skin of the aircraft was pierced by the heat and the flames.
Fire in the air?Fire in the air?
The location of insulation near the device allowed the fire to spread, investigators said.The location of insulation near the device allowed the fire to spread, investigators said.
However, had the aircraft been in the air, the outside of the aircraft would have been cold enough to limit how the fire spread.However, had the aircraft been in the air, the outside of the aircraft would have been cold enough to limit how the fire spread.
Cabin crew would have had difficulty locating the fire, as the device is located behind panels.Cabin crew would have had difficulty locating the fire, as the device is located behind panels.
The fuselage would probably have remained airworthy had the fire happened during a flight, but cabin depressurisation would have been a possibility.The fuselage would probably have remained airworthy had the fire happened during a flight, but cabin depressurisation would have been a possibility.
The toxicity of the fumes was unknown, they added.The toxicity of the fumes was unknown, they added.
But the BBC's Jonathan Sumberg says the Dreamliner was built with carbon composite materials which, when burnt, give off toxins.But the BBC's Jonathan Sumberg says the Dreamliner was built with carbon composite materials which, when burnt, give off toxins.