This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/global/2015/aug/25/cockneys-unions-and-heavenly-handbags
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Cockneys, unions and heavenly handbags | Cockneys, unions and heavenly handbags |
(2 days later) | |
Yet another article about people having difficulties in the workplace (G2, 25 August) without a single mention of the words “trade unions”. Can I just clarify that you do realise we exist outside of the confines of rail strikes and the Labour leadership election? Andy PrendergastSenior organiser, GMB (South-East London and Kent) | Yet another article about people having difficulties in the workplace (G2, 25 August) without a single mention of the words “trade unions”. Can I just clarify that you do realise we exist outside of the confines of rail strikes and the Labour leadership election? Andy PrendergastSenior organiser, GMB (South-East London and Kent) |
• What is the Cockney rhyming slang for Cockney rhyming slang (Letters, 24 August)?Andrew VincentCheltenham, Gloucestershire | |
• Regarding politicians’ attire (Letters, 25 August), let’s not forget the Thatcher handbag.Richard WalkerHangzhou, China | • Regarding politicians’ attire (Letters, 25 August), let’s not forget the Thatcher handbag.Richard WalkerHangzhou, China |
• Re your piece on algorithms (G2, 25 August), Amazon once suggested that as part of my further reading I might like a scholarly pamphlet entitled “Human Skin on Church Doors”. Still wondering about that. Judith CrosherBrompton Ralph, Somerset | |
• Heavens! Giles Fraser has brought a Christian viewpoint to the Guardian (Letters, 25 August). Who does he think he is? A priest?Chris Bruce-JonesOxted, Surrey | • Heavens! Giles Fraser has brought a Christian viewpoint to the Guardian (Letters, 25 August). Who does he think he is? A priest?Chris Bruce-JonesOxted, Surrey |
Related: Epigenetics and some turning in graves | Letters | |
• What Richard Gilyead (Letters, 25 August) does not seem able to project to is what would happen if an environmental effect was sustained through many generations for a group of a species, which is what Lamarck envisaged. What Lamarck could not have known was that his “use and disuse” is of genes rather than organs.Hugh DowerCountersett, North Yorkshire |
Previous version
1
Next version