This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34061284

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Chilcot: 'Blair not the only focus of criticism' Sir John Chilcot explains report delay to families
(about 5 hours later)
The long-awaited Chilcot report into the Iraq war will spread criticism of senior figures wider than previously thought, a newspaper has been told. Sir John Chilcot has attempted to explain to families of Iraq war victims why his report is taking so long.
The Guardian says blame will be apportioned beyond Tony Blair and his inner circle of advisers. In a statement, he said responses from those criticised in the report had opened up new lines of inquiry.
Sir John Chilcot began an inquiry into Britain's involvement in the conflict in 2009 but has yet to publish his report. But he declined to set out a timetable for publication despite legal threats from the families.
Prime Minister David Cameron has expressed frustration at the delay. Roger Bacon, whose son Major Matthew Bacon was killed in Iraq in 2005, said he was "disappointed" that he had still not been given a publication date.
Sources involved with the inquiry say that while Mr Blair, who took the decision to involve British forces in the 2003 invasion, will be the main focus of criticism, a much wider circle of ministers and officials will be in the firing line. "I'm not sure he is able to understand our anguish," said Mr Bacon.
'Pretty soon' The families had threatened legal action unless Sir John set out a timetable on Wednesday. He has promised to release one "as soon as possible" and has written to the families giving his reasons for the hold-up.
Among those who could be in focus are the Labour former Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, Sir Richard Dearlove, then head of MI6, Sir John Scarlett, chairman of the joint intelligence committee, Geoff Hoon who was defence secretary and Clare Short who was then the secretary of state for international development. Sir John said he would not be making the contents of that letter public.
The Guardian said a source close to the inquiry suggested that while military decisions after the invasion in 2003 will be called into question, "the bulk of the criticism would be directed less towards the military than others involved". 'New issues'
Delays in the publication of the report have been attributed to a process known as "Maxwellisation" which gives those facing criticism the opportunity to respond. But he issued a statement in response to their concerns, blaming the "Maxwellisation" process - where those criticised are given an opportunity to respond - for the delays.
The inquiry took evidence from around 150 people and the large number facing criticism is cited as one reason why Maxwellisation is taking so long. "Individuals have not been given an open-ended timescale and Maxwellisation is not a process of negotiation.
The delay has been a growing source of frustration for families of British soldiers who died, as well as Prime Minister David Cameron, who has demanded a timetable for publication "pretty soon". "The inquiry has remained in control of its deadlines throughout the process. In some cases, the response sent to us required detailed and complex analysis which has taken time."
The Guardian says that the final report will not include the number of people who have been sent drafts containing criticism and the public may not know to what extent Chilcot has toned down his criticism in response to objections. He said the process had identified government documents "which had not been submitted to the inquiry and which have in some cases opened up new issues".
But he added: "We expect to receive the last responses to our Maxwellisation letters shortly.
"That will allow us to complete our consideration of the responses, to decide what further work will be needed, and to provide the Prime Minister and thus Parliament and the public with a timetable for the publication of our work."
'Anguish'
When the inquiry was launched in 2009, then prime minister Gordon Brown said it would take at least a year.
Sir John said he understood "the anguish of the families of those who lost their lives in the conflict", but added "it is critically important that the report should be fair".
He has faced a barrage of criticism in recent weeks, with Prime Minister David Cameron expressing his frustration at the delays.
Clare Short, who was international development secretary at the time of the 2003 invasion, said she did not believe the Maxwellisation process was the real reason for the hold-up.
The former minister is among those criticised in the report but she said the idea people were "endlessly being consulted I think is not true".
"I think what might be true is that the draft is very poor and it's as big as War and Peace I understand, lots of people have made serious responses and they are probably having to redraft," she told BBC Radio 4's The World at One.
"But I think the hope of it being a good piece of work that Britain learns what went wrong and we don't do it again looks very, very poor to me."
Blair criticism
All of those criticised had to reply to the inquiry within a deadline of a few weeks which had passed "a long time ago," she added.
She confirmed that she had received a draft copy of a section of the report that criticises her some time ago and that other individuals who were named would have seen sections relevant to them.
Earlier, the Guardian reported that the finished report will spread criticism well beyond Tony Blair and his inner circle of advisers.
Among those who could be in focus are the Labour former Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, Sir Richard Dearlove, then head of MI6, Sir John Scarlett, chairman of the joint intelligence committee, Geoff Hoon who was defence secretary, as well as Ms Short.