This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/facebook-blocks-promotion-of-feminist-classic-damned-whores-and-gods-police-because-of-profane-title-of-book-10472426.html
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Facebook blocks promotion of feminist classic 'Damned Whores and God's Police' because of 'profane' book title | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Facebook has reportedly refused to publicise a post for a feminist author’s conference discussing her influential book because of its “profane” title. | |
| Anne Summers wrote on her personal Facebook account the social media behemoth had “denied permission” to boost a post promoting a conference discussing her 1975 book Damned Whores and God’s Police. | Anne Summers wrote on her personal Facebook account the social media behemoth had “denied permission” to boost a post promoting a conference discussing her 1975 book Damned Whores and God’s Police. |
| The book explored the persistence of Australian settlers’ binary stereotypes that had delineated women into convicted “whores” or carefully guarded “respectable” females. | The book explored the persistence of Australian settlers’ binary stereotypes that had delineated women into convicted “whores” or carefully guarded “respectable” females. |
| The controversy centres about a Facebook tool which users can pay to use to “boost” posts, enabling them to reach more peoples’ feeds - subject to higher standards than normal posts. | The controversy centres about a Facebook tool which users can pay to use to “boost” posts, enabling them to reach more peoples’ feeds - subject to higher standards than normal posts. |
| Ms Summers claims she attempted to boost the original post on Monday, but Facebook reportedly responded by saying: “We don’t allow ads that use profanity. Such language can offend viewers and doesn’t reflect the product being advertised.” | Ms Summers claims she attempted to boost the original post on Monday, but Facebook reportedly responded by saying: “We don’t allow ads that use profanity. Such language can offend viewers and doesn’t reflect the product being advertised.” |
| Dear FB friends.How do you solve a problem like this:Many years ago I wrote a book and gave it a provocative title.... | Dear FB friends.How do you solve a problem like this:Many years ago I wrote a book and gave it a provocative title.... |
| The author and campaigner told The Guardian she was “flabbergasted” by the reaction. | The author and campaigner told The Guardian she was “flabbergasted” by the reaction. |
| She suggested that the offending “profanity” may have been in the inclusion of a quote by the former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard on her public reception. | She suggested that the offending “profanity” may have been in the inclusion of a quote by the former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard on her public reception. |
| “As a woman wielding power, with all the complexities of modern politics, I was never going to be portrayed as a good woman,” Ms Gillard wrote in her memoir, My Story. “So I must be the bad woman, a scheming shrew, a heartless harridan or a lying bitch.” | “As a woman wielding power, with all the complexities of modern politics, I was never going to be portrayed as a good woman,” Ms Gillard wrote in her memoir, My Story. “So I must be the bad woman, a scheming shrew, a heartless harridan or a lying bitch.” |
| On Wednesday morning, Ms Summers’ original post had received more than 8,000 shares and 4,000 likes – far in excess of what she expected had she paid for the post to be ‘boosted’. | On Wednesday morning, Ms Summers’ original post had received more than 8,000 shares and 4,000 likes – far in excess of what she expected had she paid for the post to be ‘boosted’. |
| Ahem: 8109 shares (and 669,474 people reached). Cost: $0.00 https://t.co/2Rha24skVB | Ahem: 8109 shares (and 669,474 people reached). Cost: $0.00 https://t.co/2Rha24skVB |
| Facebook has been contacted for comment. | Facebook has been contacted for comment. |