This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34091702
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
NSA phone data collection 'not illegal', US court rules | NSA phone data collection 'not illegal', US court rules |
(35 minutes later) | |
A US appeals court has overturned a ruling that deemed the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk collection of phone records to be illegal. | A US appeals court has overturned a ruling that deemed the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk collection of phone records to be illegal. |
District of Columbia judges said the plaintiffs had failed to prove they had been targeted for NSA surveillance. | District of Columbia judges said the plaintiffs had failed to prove they had been targeted for NSA surveillance. |
Judges in a separate case in New York in May ruled the programme illegal. | |
It is not clear what the latest ruling means, as Congress has since passed legislation phasing out the NSA's bulk collection of Americans' records. | |
The agency's spying was revealed in 2013 by Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor who has since fled to Russia. | |
It collected data about numbers called and times, but not the content of conversations. It also allegedly spied on European firms, as well as high-profile individuals including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. | |
The ruling on Friday in the District of Columbia reversed a preliminary ruling in 2013 by a lower court which said the NSA programme was "probably unconstitutional and almost Orwellian". | The ruling on Friday in the District of Columbia reversed a preliminary ruling in 2013 by a lower court which said the NSA programme was "probably unconstitutional and almost Orwellian". |
But judges said the case should not continue because the people that brought the case - activist Larry Klayman and the parents of an NSA employee killed in Afghanistan - fell "short of meeting the higher burden of proof required for a preliminary injunction". | But judges said the case should not continue because the people that brought the case - activist Larry Klayman and the parents of an NSA employee killed in Afghanistan - fell "short of meeting the higher burden of proof required for a preliminary injunction". |
Congress in June passed legislation aimed at scaling back the programme in the coming months and ending bulk collection of Americans' records. | |
Bulk data collection rulings | Bulk data collection rulings |
The new measures are not due to take effect until December. | The new measures are not due to take effect until December. |
The new law requires telecoms companies to store data, instead of US intelligence agencies, and to hand over any information in response to a government request approved by a secret counter-terror court. | The new law requires telecoms companies to store data, instead of US intelligence agencies, and to hand over any information in response to a government request approved by a secret counter-terror court. |
The Snowden revelations in June 2013 caused an international outcry, despite US administrations insisting the programme had been fully authorised. | The Snowden revelations in June 2013 caused an international outcry, despite US administrations insisting the programme had been fully authorised. |
Previous version
1
Next version