This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34124142

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
EU referendum: 'Significant' changes to rules for vote EU referendum: 'Significant' changes to campaigning rules
(about 1 hour later)
Rules on campaigning in the UK's in-out EU referendum are to face "significant" changes, the government is to announce. The government is to change its planned rules on campaigning in the UK's in-out EU referendum after criticism from Eurosceptic Conservative MPs.
The changes will focus on rules which stop ministers using public money and making announcements to campaign for one side from 28 days before a vote. It had been proposed that - unlike during elections - there would not be restrictions on the way ministers could campaign in the run-up to the vote.
The government had wanted to suspend these laws so ministers could continue to discuss European matters in public. Critics argued this meant the pro-EU campaign could benefit from the "machinery of government".
But the government is expected to keep the restrictions with "exceptions" after pressure from Eurosceptic MPs. The rethink will be for campaign restrictions "with exceptions".
Eurosceptic MPs have argued that by relaxing the so-called purdah rules, the pro-EU camp could potentially benefit from the "machinery of government". Details of the changes - including what the exceptions are - will be outlined in amendments being tabled to the EU Referendum Bill later on Wednesday.
The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 sets out a 28-day period ahead of any referendum, during which ministers, government departments and local authorities are banned from publishing material relating to the issue in question. The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 sets out a 28-day "purdah" period ahead of any referendum, during which ministers, government departments and local authorities are banned from publishing material relating to the issue in question.
'Shadow of doubt'
Prime Minister David Cameron claimed suspending these rules was necessary to allow the government to continue dealing with EU matters during the referendum period.Prime Minister David Cameron claimed suspending these rules was necessary to allow the government to continue dealing with EU matters during the referendum period.
Ministers also said the purdah rules would stop them being able to defend the national interest in Brussels.Ministers also said the purdah rules would stop them being able to defend the national interest in Brussels.
Sir Bill Cash, the veteran Tory MP and chair of the European Scrutiny Committee, welcomed the suggestion the purdah rules would remain but said he would wait to see the exact details of the amendments. What is purdah?
Purdah is a longstanding convention whereby governments refrain from making any major announcements in the run-up to general elections or other polls to avoid influencing their outcome.
The existing rules were set out in legislation passed in 2000. They prevent ministers, departments and local authorities from publishing any "promotional material" arguing for or against any particular outcome or referring to any of the issues involved in the referendum.
The rules, which apply to the 28 days up to polling day, do not preclude ministers from issuing press notices or responding to specific requests for information from members of the public.
Special allowance is also made for bodies or individuals designated under section 108 of the law, giving them greater flexibility.
Sir Bill Cash, the veteran Tory MP and chair of the European Scrutiny Committee, welcomed the suggestion the purdah rules would be in force for the EU referendum but said he would wait to see the exact details of the amendments.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The real issue here is one of fairness and that's the case that we've made and also this is yes versus no. It's not a party political issue as between the political parties.He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The real issue here is one of fairness and that's the case that we've made and also this is yes versus no. It's not a party political issue as between the political parties.
"We know there are many people in the Labour party and the SNP who very much agree with us.""We know there are many people in the Labour party and the SNP who very much agree with us."
Sir Bill tabled an amendment to reinstate the purdah period for the referendum but was defeated in June. Sir Bill tabled an amendment to reinstate the purdah period for the referendum but was defeated in June. Twenty seven Tory MPs rebelled against the government plans, which avoided defeat only because Labour chose to abstain.
He said there were "quite a lot of people in the House of Commons" who were "absolutely clear that it is not in the national interest to use the machinery of government for the purposes of what could turn out to be support for the yes vote". Sir Bill said there were "quite a lot of people in the House of Commons" who were "absolutely clear that it is not in the national interest to use the machinery of government for the purposes of what could turn out to be support for the yes vote".
He added: "We're saying this is a matter of principle and it would apply whether there was to be a yes or note vote, if the government, for example, did change its mind." He added: "We're saying this is a matter of principle and it would apply whether there was to be a yes or no vote, if the government, for example, did change its mind."
In June, 27 Tory MPs rebelled against the government plans for suspension of the rules, which avoided defeat only because Labour chose to abstain. In July a report from the Public Administration Committee said it was also unconvinced by ministers' arguments.
Then in July a report from the Public Administration Committee said it was also unconvinced by ministers' arguments. Analysis by political correspondent Robin Brant
Standby for climbdown number two.
Yesterday the government was forced to agree a change to the EU referendum question. Today it's expected to accept that "purdah" - the period where government activity is put on hold before an election or vote - should remain in place.
It looks like there will be exemptions though when the amendment to the EU Referendum Bill comes later.
That means Downing Street can stick by its desire to make sure the UK isn't left out of any big European decision making in the final weeks of the campaign but - and this is the important bit for campaigners who want to see Britain leave the EU - there will be no public money spent on ads, e-mails or mailshots to try to sway public opinion in the final days.
It may be enough to persuade some of the 27 Tory MPs who rebelled in June to come round (they were mostly the "usual suspects", with none of the 2015 intake going against the prime minister) but the granddaddy of sceptics is still holding out.
Sir Bill Cash has pointed out a complete purdah on government departments and ministers has been in place for four previous referendums up to now.
In a critical report, it said such a move would "cast a shadow of doubt over the propriety" of the referendum on whether the UK should remain in the EU or leave.In a critical report, it said such a move would "cast a shadow of doubt over the propriety" of the referendum on whether the UK should remain in the EU or leave.
'Seen to be fair' One Whitehall source told the BBC: "There will be a pretty significant shift in the government position. There is no wish within the government to be in a position where doubt is cast on the fairness of the referendum.
BBC deputy political editor James Landale said the changes - set to be tabled later - were "designed to reassure the government's critics".
He added: "The changes are expected to restore the restrictions on ministers, with some exceptions."
One Whitehall source told the BBC: "There will be a pretty significant shift in the government position.
"There is no wish within the government to be in a position where doubt is cast on the fairness of the referendum.
"It has got to be fair. And it has got to be seen to be fair.""It has got to be fair. And it has got to be seen to be fair."
The amendments have to be published on Wednesday so there is time for MPs to consider them before debating and voting on them next Monday.The amendments have to be published on Wednesday so there is time for MPs to consider them before debating and voting on them next Monday.
'Early April referendum' Mr Cameron has pledged to hold an EU referendum by the end of 2017 but the BBC understands some allies are contemplating staging it as early as next April.
Meanwhile, allies of Mr Cameron, who has pledged to hold an EU referendum by 2017, are contemplating staging it as early as next April, BBC Newsnight understands.
Senior Tories would like to get the referendum staged earlier in Mr Cameron's second term, to allow him to capitalise on what Conservatives think could be Labour Party infighting over the potential election of leadership hopeful, Jeremy Corbyn, the programme reported.
A government source said a referendum in April was "possible" but pointed out that the referendum legislation was still likely to be held up in the House of Lords, as peers tried to amend it.
The SNP's foreign affairs spokesman Alex Salmond told Newsnight that there was no way the government would get parliamentary approval - the support not just of Tories but of opposition parties too - for a referendum as early as April 2016.
On Tuesday, the government accepted the Electoral Commission's recommendations to scrap plans for a Yes/No vote and instead ask voters if they want to "remain in" or "leave the EU".