This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/03/scotlands-minimum-alcohol-price-plan-dealt-huge-blow

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Scotland's minimum alcohol price plan dealt huge blow Scotland's minimum alcohol price plan dealt blow
(about 2 hours later)
Nicola Sturgeon’s plans to fix a minimum price for alcohol has suffered a huge blow after the European court’s top lawyer ruled it would infringe EU law on free trade. Nicola Sturgeon’s plan to fix a minimum price for alcohol has suffered a huge blow after the European court’s top lawyer ruled it would risk infringing EU law on free trade.
In a formal opinion on Sturgeon’s flagship policy, the advocate general to the European court of justice, Yves Bot, has said fixing a legal price for all alcoholic drinks could only be justified to protect public health if no other mechanism, such as tax increases, could be found.In a formal opinion on Sturgeon’s flagship policy, the advocate general to the European court of justice, Yves Bot, has said fixing a legal price for all alcoholic drinks could only be justified to protect public health if no other mechanism, such as tax increases, could be found.
Bot’s opinion is expected to mean a final defeat for the Scottish government’s efforts to be the first in Europe to introduce minimum pricing – supported by leading figures in the medical profession and the police, after several years of legal battles.Bot’s opinion is expected to mean a final defeat for the Scottish government’s efforts to be the first in Europe to introduce minimum pricing – supported by leading figures in the medical profession and the police, after several years of legal battles.
It is highly likely the ECJ in Luxembourg will now uphold complaints from the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) and nine other member states, including France, Spain and Bulgaria, because its judgments rarely contradict an opinion from the advocate general.It is highly likely the ECJ in Luxembourg will now uphold complaints from the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) and nine other member states, including France, Spain and Bulgaria, because its judgments rarely contradict an opinion from the advocate general.
Bot said: “I feel that, having regard to the principle of proportionality, it is difficult to justify the rules at issue, which appear to me to be less consistent and effective than an ‘increased taxation’ measure and may even be perceived as being discriminatory.”Bot said: “I feel that, having regard to the principle of proportionality, it is difficult to justify the rules at issue, which appear to me to be less consistent and effective than an ‘increased taxation’ measure and may even be perceived as being discriminatory.”
The ECJ said Bot was “of the opinion that such a system risks infringing the principle of the free movement of goods and would only be legal if it could be shown that no other mechanism was capable of achieving the desired result of protecting public health.The ECJ said Bot was “of the opinion that such a system risks infringing the principle of the free movement of goods and would only be legal if it could be shown that no other mechanism was capable of achieving the desired result of protecting public health.
“In particular, the advocate general suggests that increasing taxation of alcohol could be an alternative and it would be for the Scottish government to prove that this was not a suitable means of curbing excessive consumption of alcohol.”“In particular, the advocate general suggests that increasing taxation of alcohol could be an alternative and it would be for the Scottish government to prove that this was not a suitable means of curbing excessive consumption of alcohol.”
He concluded: “A member state can choose rules imposing a minimum retail price of alcoholic beverages, which restricts trade within the European Union and distorts competition, rather than increased taxation of those products, only on condition that it shows that the measure chosen presents additional advantages or fewer disadvantages by comparison with the alternative measure.” Nicola Sturgeon said on Twitter she believed that Bot’s opinion did not rule out minimum pricing entirely but established the legal tests that a national court needed to apply implying the Scottish government still believed its policy could be authorised by the courts.
The SWA said its longstanding opposition to the proposal had been vindicated since the court had repeated ruled against minimum pricing, while health campaigners and Scottish ministers were bitterly disappointed. Sturgeon added that she welcomed the opinion because it said minimum pricing was not precluded by EU law, and it said that domestic courts had the final say.
“While we must await the final outcome of this legal process, the Scottish government remains certain that minimum unit pricing is the right measure for Scotland to reduce the harm that cheap, high-strength alcohol causes our communities,” she said.
“In recent weeks statistics have shown that alcohol-related deaths are rising again and that consumption may be rising again after a period of decline. We believe minimum unit pricing would save hundreds of lives in coming years and we will continue to vigorously make the case for this policy.”
The ECJ is now expected to refer the case back to the court of session for a final decision, but Bot made clear he believed that Scottish ministers would had to prove that minimum pricing had fewer disadvantages than using general or targeted taxation – a difficult test to meet.
The Scottish government could now argue in court that it has no other powers because it is unable to control alcohol taxation since that is controlled by the UK government, leading to further legal battles in the Scottish courts and a fresh constitutional row over Holyrood’s tax powers.
Bot said an EU member state can use minimum pricing to restrict trade and distorted competition on health grounds “only on condition that it shows that the measure chosen [minimum pricing] has additional advantages or fewer disadvantages than the alternative measure.
“I shall add that the fact that the alternative measure of increased taxation is capable of procuring additional advantages by contributing to the general objective of combating alcohol abuse does not justify rejecting that measure in favour of the MUP measure.”
The latest statistics showed that alcohol-related deaths in Scotland rose last year by 5% to 1,152 deaths. It was the third year in a row the death rate had increased after a long-term decline from a high of 1,546 in 2006 – well above the rate in the rest of the UK.The latest statistics showed that alcohol-related deaths in Scotland rose last year by 5% to 1,152 deaths. It was the third year in a row the death rate had increased after a long-term decline from a high of 1,546 in 2006 – well above the rate in the rest of the UK.
In 2013, nearly 30 men out of every 100,000 died of alcohol-related diseases in Scotland, against a UK average of 19 deaths per 100,000.In 2013, nearly 30 men out of every 100,000 died of alcohol-related diseases in Scotland, against a UK average of 19 deaths per 100,000.
A law introducing a 50p minimum price for each unit of alcohol was passed by the Scottish parliament in May 2012, after opposition parties reluctantly backed a policy championed by Sturgeon while she was the Scottish health secretary.A law introducing a 50p minimum price for each unit of alcohol was passed by the Scottish parliament in May 2012, after opposition parties reluctantly backed a policy championed by Sturgeon while she was the Scottish health secretary.
Its implementation had to be suspended until the legal challenges were exhausted. A first challenge by the SWA was rejected by Lord Docherty at the court of session, Scotland’s civil court, in 2013.Its implementation had to be suspended until the legal challenges were exhausted. A first challenge by the SWA was rejected by Lord Docherty at the court of session, Scotland’s civil court, in 2013.
An SWA challenge to that ruling was then referred on appeal by the court of session to the European court in April 2014, without it then going to the UK supreme court. It said there were many complex issues which had to be investigated and settled at European level.An SWA challenge to that ruling was then referred on appeal by the court of session to the European court in April 2014, without it then going to the UK supreme court. It said there were many complex issues which had to be investigated and settled at European level.
The case was being watched closely by the UK government, which had been toying with a lower minimum price of 45p in England and Wales but had backed down in 2013. While doctors’ leaders and previous chief medical officers heavily backed the measure it has been resisted by the Home Office and the drinks industry.The case was being watched closely by the UK government, which had been toying with a lower minimum price of 45p in England and Wales but had backed down in 2013. While doctors’ leaders and previous chief medical officers heavily backed the measure it has been resisted by the Home Office and the drinks industry.
The proposal had split the drinks industry: leading companies in the pub trade supported minimum pricing because cheap alcohol in supermarkets damaged their business.The proposal had split the drinks industry: leading companies in the pub trade supported minimum pricing because cheap alcohol in supermarkets damaged their business.
The UK’s most powerful distillers, such as the gin, vodka and whisky giant Diageo, opposed it because it would increase prices of their cheaper brands, raising the starting price for a standard bottle of whisky to £14.The UK’s most powerful distillers, such as the gin, vodka and whisky giant Diageo, opposed it because it would increase prices of their cheaper brands, raising the starting price for a standard bottle of whisky to £14.
Branding it “un-targeted, misguided and illegal”, the SWA said Scottish government data showed a 50p minimum price would affect 33% of the alcohol bought by those in poverty and 22% of that bought by those not in poverty, so it had a regressive impact by penalising responsible drinkers.Branding it “un-targeted, misguided and illegal”, the SWA said Scottish government data showed a 50p minimum price would affect 33% of the alcohol bought by those in poverty and 22% of that bought by those not in poverty, so it had a regressive impact by penalising responsible drinkers.
In response to the ruling, David Frost, SWA chief executive, said: “We welcome the advocate general’s opinion on minimum unit pricing (MUP) of alcohol. The opinion encourages us in our long-held view that MUP is illegal when there are less trade restrictive measures available. We await the Court of Justice’s final ruling.In response to the ruling, David Frost, SWA chief executive, said: “We welcome the advocate general’s opinion on minimum unit pricing (MUP) of alcohol. The opinion encourages us in our long-held view that MUP is illegal when there are less trade restrictive measures available. We await the Court of Justice’s final ruling.
“It remains important to address alcohol misuse with a range of other measures of proven effectiveness. We will continue to work closely with the Scottish Government and other stakeholders on this. There is a long-term trend of falling alcohol-related deaths and harms in Scotland which suggests that measures in place are working.”“It remains important to address alcohol misuse with a range of other measures of proven effectiveness. We will continue to work closely with the Scottish Government and other stakeholders on this. There is a long-term trend of falling alcohol-related deaths and harms in Scotland which suggests that measures in place are working.”
Scotland had already banned multi-buy discounts for alcohol and introduced tougher controls on alcohol displays by supermarkets. The SWA said alcohol-related deaths had fallen 32% since their peak in 2003, while related hospital admissions had fallen 19% since 2007/08. Binge drinking figures had fallen, as had convictions for drink driving.Scotland had already banned multi-buy discounts for alcohol and introduced tougher controls on alcohol displays by supermarkets. The SWA said alcohol-related deaths had fallen 32% since their peak in 2003, while related hospital admissions had fallen 19% since 2007/08. Binge drinking figures had fallen, as had convictions for drink driving.