This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34149523

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Thailand constitution: Military's council rejects draft Thailand constitution: Military's council rejects draft
(35 minutes later)
A council appointed by Thailand's military rulers has rejected a controversial new constitution drafted after last year's coup.A council appointed by Thailand's military rulers has rejected a controversial new constitution drafted after last year's coup.
A new committee must now be appointed to write another draft, further setting back elections.A new committee must now be appointed to write another draft, further setting back elections.
The draft has been widely criticised, in particular a clause which enables a 23-member panel to take over government during a "national crisis".The draft has been widely criticised, in particular a clause which enables a 23-member panel to take over government during a "national crisis".
The army ousted the elected government after months of political unrest.The army ousted the elected government after months of political unrest.
The 247-member National Reform Council rejected the draft charter by 135 votes to 105, with seven abstentions.The 247-member National Reform Council rejected the draft charter by 135 votes to 105, with seven abstentions.
A new committee will have 180 days to write a new one, which will later be put to a nationwide referendum.A new committee will have 180 days to write a new one, which will later be put to a nationwide referendum.
Analysis: By Jonathan Head, BBC News, Bangkok
Many commentators had assumed that a council chosen by the military government would automatically approve a constitution backed by the same government. That didn't happen. Despite talk of heavy last-minute lobbying, the National Reform Council voted against the charter by a clear majority.
But the outcome will be of little comfort to the charter's many critics. They had pointed to the effective legalisation of future military intervention, and the weakening of political parties and elected governments, as proof that the draft was undemocratic.
But its rejection will now extend military rule for at least another six months while another constitution is written, with no guarantee that will be passed - and even if it is, it may then be voted down in a required national referendum.
The timetable for a return to democratic government in Thailand is being extended, with no clear end in sight.
Until a new constitution can be drafted, the military government retains its substantial powers.Until a new constitution can be drafted, the military government retains its substantial powers.
It had said elections could take place in late 2016, but analysts say the delay means 2017 is more likely.It had said elections could take place in late 2016, but analysts say the delay means 2017 is more likely.
Critics of the draft constitution said it erodes the power of political parties in favour of the army.Critics of the draft constitution said it erodes the power of political parties in favour of the army.
Thailand has seen numerous different constitutions since the end of the absolute monarchy in 1932, eroding confidence in what is supposed to be a fundamental legal document.Thailand has seen numerous different constitutions since the end of the absolute monarchy in 1932, eroding confidence in what is supposed to be a fundamental legal document.