This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-34184728

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Alistair Carmichael leak denial was an 'untruth' Alistair Carmichael leak denial was an 'untruth'
(35 minutes later)
A legal challenge to the election of Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael has been told his denial of a leaked memo was important.A legal challenge to the election of Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael has been told his denial of a leaked memo was important.
At a special election court, Jonathan Mitchell QC claimed Mr Carmichael told an "untruth" when he denied knowing about the memo.At a special election court, Jonathan Mitchell QC claimed Mr Carmichael told an "untruth" when he denied knowing about the memo.
The QC said: "This is fundamental, dishonourable conduct."The QC said: "This is fundamental, dishonourable conduct."
Four of the Orkney and Shetland MP's constituents raised the case under the Representation of the People Act. After two days of evidence, judge Lady Paton said there would be a written judgement in due course.
They claim Mr Carmichael authorised the leak in order to influence the outcome of May's vote. The case, believed to be the first of its kind in Scotland for 50 years, was adjourned until then.
The case, believed to be the first of its kind in Scotland for 50 years, arose from remarks made by Mr Carmichael at the start of the general election campaign in April. It had been brought by four of the Orkney and Shetland MP's constituents under the Representation of the People Act.
The MP - Scottish Secretary in the Tory-Lib Dem coalition before the election - had authorised the leaking of a civil service memo suggesting Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had told the French ambassador she backed Tory PM David Cameron to remain in Downing Street. They claimed Mr Carmichael authorised the leaked memo in order to influence the outcome of May's vote.
It arose from a story in the Daily Telegraph at the start of the general election campaign in April.
Mr Carmichael - Scottish Secretary in the Tory-Lib Dem coalition before the election - had authorised the leaking of a civil service memo suggesting Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had told the French ambassador she backed Tory PM David Cameron to remain in Downing Street.
Throughout the election campaign, Mr Carmichael denied leaking the confidential memo to the Daily Telegraph.Throughout the election campaign, Mr Carmichael denied leaking the confidential memo to the Daily Telegraph.
He claimed in a TV interview the first he had heard of it was when he received a phone call from a journalist.He claimed in a TV interview the first he had heard of it was when he received a phone call from a journalist.
However, the MP later admitted full responsibility for sanctioning its release, and accepted the "details of the account are not correct".However, the MP later admitted full responsibility for sanctioning its release, and accepted the "details of the account are not correct".
The constituents who brought the petition, Timothy Morrison, Phemie Matheson, Fiona Grahame and Carolyn Welling, all of Orkney, were aided by crowd funding.The constituents who brought the petition, Timothy Morrison, Phemie Matheson, Fiona Grahame and Carolyn Welling, all of Orkney, were aided by crowd funding.
They maintain that Mr Carmichael's statement on when he first became aware of the leak of the memo took place before the election and was untruthful.They maintain that Mr Carmichael's statement on when he first became aware of the leak of the memo took place before the election and was untruthful.
Under the Act, for a candidate to break the law they must make a false statement of fact with regard to the personal character or conduct of a candidate before or during an election for the purpose of affecting votes.Under the Act, for a candidate to break the law they must make a false statement of fact with regard to the personal character or conduct of a candidate before or during an election for the purpose of affecting votes.
Mr Mitchell, representing the petitioners, said that the actual leaking of the memo did not breach electoral laws.Mr Mitchell, representing the petitioners, said that the actual leaking of the memo did not breach electoral laws.
But he said it was Mr Carmichael's subsequent denial of not knowing anything until a journalist had made him aware of the leak that had broken electoral law.But he said it was Mr Carmichael's subsequent denial of not knowing anything until a journalist had made him aware of the leak that had broken electoral law.
He added: "The false statement is his denial."He added: "The false statement is his denial."
Mr Mitchell said even if the leaked memo was entirely accurate, the denial of awareness of the leak would remain.Mr Mitchell said even if the leaked memo was entirely accurate, the denial of awareness of the leak would remain.
The QC said the betrayal of confidence and betrayal of secrets was essentially personal, even if driven by political motive.The QC said the betrayal of confidence and betrayal of secrets was essentially personal, even if driven by political motive.
He has already told the court that his clients believed that Mr Carmichael leaked the information to deliberately smear the SNP.He has already told the court that his clients believed that Mr Carmichael leaked the information to deliberately smear the SNP.
Roddy Dunlop QC, for Mr Carmichael, had earlier asked judges at the Court of Session to dismiss the case at the start of the hearing on Monday.Roddy Dunlop QC, for Mr Carmichael, had earlier asked judges at the Court of Session to dismiss the case at the start of the hearing on Monday.
He told the specially-convened election court that the petition was "irrelevant" and "bound to fail".He told the specially-convened election court that the petition was "irrelevant" and "bound to fail".
The hearing before Lady Paton and Lord Matthews continues.