This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/sep/08/bild-photos-aylan-kurdi-complaints

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
German paper Bild removes all photos in protest over Aylan Kurdi complaints German paper Bild removes all photos in protest over Alan Kurdi complaints
(about 2 hours later)
Germany’s best-selling newspaper has removed all pictures from its print edition and website in response to complaints about its decision to publish images of the three-year-old Syrian refugee who drowned trying to reach Greece.Germany’s best-selling newspaper has removed all pictures from its print edition and website in response to complaints about its decision to publish images of the three-year-old Syrian refugee who drowned trying to reach Greece.
A statement from Bild says the photo of Aylan Kurdi, who died last week along with his mother and five year old brother, “caused dismay and compassion” and “rattled a million people awake”. A statement from Bild says the photo of Alan Kurdi, who died last week along with his mother and five year old brother, “caused dismay and compassion” and “rattled a million people awake”.
It likened the images to the famous photo of a Vietnamese girl running from a napalm strike during the Vietnam war, adding: “The world must see the truth in order to change.”It likened the images to the famous photo of a Vietnamese girl running from a napalm strike during the Vietnam war, adding: “The world must see the truth in order to change.”
Related: Will the image of a lifeless boy on a beach change the refugee debate?Related: Will the image of a lifeless boy on a beach change the refugee debate?
Warum @BILD heute keine Bilder zeigt! http://t.co/qWQ9Z1OkbR pic.twitter.com/SXY9DoXgj2Warum @BILD heute keine Bilder zeigt! http://t.co/qWQ9Z1OkbR pic.twitter.com/SXY9DoXgj2
The decision to remove pictures in print and online comes less than a week after the newspaper dedicated its whole back page to the distressing image of Aylan lying face down on the beach in Bodrum, surrounded by a black background and a plea for action from Europe. The decision to remove pictures in print and online comes less than a week after the newspaper dedicated its whole back page to the distressing image of Alan lying face down on the beach in Bodrum, surrounded by a black background and a plea for action from Europe.
This is what the text under the photo says in English #tomorrowspaperstoday #bbcpapers via @tanit pic.twitter.com/sLk4ePEiB0This is what the text under the photo says in English #tomorrowspaperstoday #bbcpapers via @tanit pic.twitter.com/sLk4ePEiB0
The images of Aylan have helped shift debate across Europe and contributed to a public outcry over the plight of refugees trying to reach the continent. The images of Alan have helped shift debate across Europe and contributed to a public outcry over the plight of refugees trying to reach the continent.
However, they have also caused controversy, with numerous papers including the Guardian choosing to print a picture of a policeman cradling the dead child on their front pages rather than the image him lying face down on the beach.However, they have also caused controversy, with numerous papers including the Guardian choosing to print a picture of a policeman cradling the dead child on their front pages rather than the image him lying face down on the beach.
The Independent was the only UK paper to choose the more distressing image of Aylan for its front page. The Independent was the only UK paper to choose the more distressing image of Alan for its front page.
Independent editor Amol Rajan defended the use of the picture on Saturday, writing: “Ultimately, we felt – and still do – that the power to shock is a vital instrument of journalism, and therefore democracy. Our motivation wasn’t avaricious; it was to shock the world into action.”Independent editor Amol Rajan defended the use of the picture on Saturday, writing: “Ultimately, we felt – and still do – that the power to shock is a vital instrument of journalism, and therefore democracy. Our motivation wasn’t avaricious; it was to shock the world into action.”