This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/09/arkansas-schedules-executions-october
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Arkansas schedules first executions in 10 years but expects legal challenge | Arkansas schedules first executions in 10 years but expects legal challenge |
(35 minutes later) | |
Arkansas will resume lethal injections after a 10-year gap starting next month with a double execution, Governor Asa Hutchinson said on Wednesday as he announced execution dates for eight death-row inmates. | |
Arkansas hasn’t executed an inmate since 2005, largely because of court challenges to the state’s lethal injection law and a nationwide shortage in the drugs Arkansas has used during executions. | Arkansas hasn’t executed an inmate since 2005, largely because of court challenges to the state’s lethal injection law and a nationwide shortage in the drugs Arkansas has used during executions. |
But last week, the state attorney general, Leslie Rutledge, sent letters to the governor requesting that execution dates be set. Rutledge said the inmates’ appeals had been exhausted, and the state department of corrections said it had purchased enough doses of its lethal-injection drugs to perform the executions. | |
Hutchinson acknowledged, however, that he expects the dates to be challenged. | Hutchinson acknowledged, however, that he expects the dates to be challenged. |
One pending lawsuit challenges a new state law that allows the corrections department not to disclose how it obtains its execution drugs. Federal courts, including the US supreme court, have rejected similar arguments used by inmates in Missouri, Texas and other states that also allow prisons to keep their drug suppliers’ names secret. | One pending lawsuit challenges a new state law that allows the corrections department not to disclose how it obtains its execution drugs. Federal courts, including the US supreme court, have rejected similar arguments used by inmates in Missouri, Texas and other states that also allow prisons to keep their drug suppliers’ names secret. |
Attorney Jeff Rosenzweig is representing the eight inmates, along with a ninth death-row inmate whose case is still being appealed, in the lawsuit. Rosenzweig said earlier this month that he plans to file motions to delay any execution date the governor set. | Attorney Jeff Rosenzweig is representing the eight inmates, along with a ninth death-row inmate whose case is still being appealed, in the lawsuit. Rosenzweig said earlier this month that he plans to file motions to delay any execution date the governor set. |
The first two executions are scheduled for 21 October. | |
Arkansas has executed 27 people since the US supreme court reauthorized the death penalty in 1976, though none since Eric Nance was put to death in 2005 for the killing of 18-year-old Julie Heath of Malvern. | Arkansas has executed 27 people since the US supreme court reauthorized the death penalty in 1976, though none since Eric Nance was put to death in 2005 for the killing of 18-year-old Julie Heath of Malvern. |
Arkansas’s execution protocol calls for a three-drug process. The department of corrections said that as of 1 July, it had enough of the drugs, including midazolam, to perform the executions. | Arkansas’s execution protocol calls for a three-drug process. The department of corrections said that as of 1 July, it had enough of the drugs, including midazolam, to perform the executions. |
Midazolam was implicated after executions last year in Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma went longer than expected, with inmates gasping and groaning as they died. The US supreme court approved continued use of the drug in June, rejecting a challenge from three Oklahoma death-row inmates. | Midazolam was implicated after executions last year in Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma went longer than expected, with inmates gasping and groaning as they died. The US supreme court approved continued use of the drug in June, rejecting a challenge from three Oklahoma death-row inmates. |
Previous version
1
Next version