This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/14/jeremy-corbyn-prime-minister-change-politics-corbynism

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Jeremy Corbyn probably won’t be prime minister, but he can change politics Jeremy Corbyn probably won’t be prime minister, but he can change politics
(about 1 hour later)
Jeremy Corbyn may sincerely want to do politics differently. But he’s given shadow chancellor of the exchequer, the biggest job in his gift, to John McDonnell, an old friend and ally – a crony, even – nonetheless. As for his vow to have an equal ratio of men and women in his cabinet, well, all of the other most senior jobs have been given to men too. I fear that Corbyn is likely to discover, pretty quickly, that the rhetoric of change is easier to conjure than change itself.Jeremy Corbyn may sincerely want to do politics differently. But he’s given shadow chancellor of the exchequer, the biggest job in his gift, to John McDonnell, an old friend and ally – a crony, even – nonetheless. As for his vow to have an equal ratio of men and women in his cabinet, well, all of the other most senior jobs have been given to men too. I fear that Corbyn is likely to discover, pretty quickly, that the rhetoric of change is easier to conjure than change itself.
Related: Jeremy Corbyn appoints ally John McDonnell as shadow chancellorRelated: Jeremy Corbyn appoints ally John McDonnell as shadow chancellor
Yet, already, one can see that, in fairness, Corbyn doesn’t have a large pool of talent to draw from, with experienced Labour MPs already finding reasons why they cannot serve in his shadow cabinet. But, those who remain aghast at Corbyn’s rise are already behaving foolishly. The people who support Corbyn are going to be mightily annoyed if they feel that he is not being given the right to succeed or fail on his own terms. Yet already one can see that, in fairness, Corbyn doesn’t have a large pool of talent to draw from, with experienced Labour MPs already finding reasons why they cannot serve in his shadow cabinet. But those who remain aghast at Corbyn’s rise are already behaving foolishly. The people who support Corbyn are going to be mightily annoyed if they feel that he is not being given the right to succeed or fail on his own terms.
In these early days after Corbyn’s election as Labour leader, a paradox is already emerging. If all of these legions of critics believe that Corbyn’s administration is as doomed to self-destruction as they say it is, then why don’t they just grab a box of popcorn, sit back and watch?In these early days after Corbyn’s election as Labour leader, a paradox is already emerging. If all of these legions of critics believe that Corbyn’s administration is as doomed to self-destruction as they say it is, then why don’t they just grab a box of popcorn, sit back and watch?
Instead, the Sun insists that Corbyn will appoint a minister for Jews, the Telegraph announces “the day the Labour Party died” and the Times warns that Corbyn has started a civil war.Politicians and commentators all seem so certain that Corbynism will collapse. But their disdainful hostility only fuels the strong sense that Corbyn’s supporters have, of their hopes of creating a better polity always being thwarted by the dark forces of the establishment. Instead, the Sun insists that Corbyn will appoint a minister for Jews, the Telegraph announces “the day the Labour party died”, and the Times warns that Corbyn has started a civil war.Politicians and commentators all seem so certain that Corbynism will collapse. But their disdainful hostility only fuels the strong sense held by Corbyn’s supporters, that their hopes of creating a better polity are always thwarted by the dark forces of the establishment.
I think I know why. I don’t believe that Corbyn is going to become prime minister. But I do think that this country deserves the opportunity to take part in a full and frank debate about the shortcomings of the approaches of both main parties. It’s true that the solutions of the future are not going to be found in the past – which is why I don’t personally believe that Corbyn is the answer.I think I know why. I don’t believe that Corbyn is going to become prime minister. But I do think that this country deserves the opportunity to take part in a full and frank debate about the shortcomings of the approaches of both main parties. It’s true that the solutions of the future are not going to be found in the past – which is why I don’t personally believe that Corbyn is the answer.
Related: ‘Britain can’t cut its way to prosperity. We have to build it’ | Jeremy CorbynRelated: ‘Britain can’t cut its way to prosperity. We have to build it’ | Jeremy Corbyn
But I do believe that serious re-evaluation of the post-war course of politics is urgently needed. All Corbyn has to do, in order to take his place in the history books, is to secure the space for that debate. His enemies know this too, which is why they are choosing to bay and scream, or simply absent themselves using principled-sounding excuses.But I do believe that serious re-evaluation of the post-war course of politics is urgently needed. All Corbyn has to do, in order to take his place in the history books, is to secure the space for that debate. His enemies know this too, which is why they are choosing to bay and scream, or simply absent themselves using principled-sounding excuses.
If politicians and commentators truly care about the future, they need to opt instead for the harder and more rewarding task of trying to work out what Corbyn’s appeal really means, instead of sneering. They must examine and refine Corbyn’s ideas, giving sound reasons if they end up rejecting them all the same. Instead, they are already destroying any hope of progress through these interesting times.If politicians and commentators truly care about the future, they need to opt instead for the harder and more rewarding task of trying to work out what Corbyn’s appeal really means, instead of sneering. They must examine and refine Corbyn’s ideas, giving sound reasons if they end up rejecting them all the same. Instead, they are already destroying any hope of progress through these interesting times.