This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34332853

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
'Happy Birthday' ruled out of copyright 'Happy Birthday' ruled out of copyright
(34 minutes later)
The company collecting royalties to "Happy Birthday To You" does not hold a valid copyright to the song, a US federal judge has ruled.The company collecting royalties to "Happy Birthday To You" does not hold a valid copyright to the song, a US federal judge has ruled.
Warner/Chappell acquired the copyright - which was originally filed in 1935 - in the 1980s. Warner/Chappell acquired the copyright - which was originally filed in 1935 - in 1988.
But Judge George King ruled that the original copyright was only granted for specific arrangements of the music, not the song itself.But Judge George King ruled that the original copyright was only granted for specific arrangements of the music, not the song itself.
The tune was composed by two sisters in the late 19th Century. The tune was composed by two Kentucky sisters in 1893.
Mildred and Patty Hill called their version Good Morning To All, which later evolved into the version popular at birthday parties around the world.Mildred and Patty Hill called their version Good Morning To All, which later evolved into the version popular at birthday parties around the world.
It was copyrighted by the sisters' publisher, Clayton F Summy Co, in 1935. The case against Warner/Chappell was launched in 2013 by Rupa Marya and Robert Siegel, who are making a film about the song.
But Judge King ruled that Summy had never acquired copyright to the song's words. The music publisher asked for $ 1,500 (£2,325) for the right to use "Happy Birthday To You" in the film.
Ms Marya and Mr Siegel argued the song was in the public domain and should not be subject to copyright fees.
Judge King ruled that Summy had never acquired copyright to the song's words.
"The Hill sisters gave Summy Co the rights to the melody, and the rights to piano arrangements based on the melody, but never any rights to the lyrics," he said.
The rights to the song were eventually purchased by Warner/Chappell for $25m (£16m) when they bought a successor company to Summy in the 1980s.The rights to the song were eventually purchased by Warner/Chappell for $25m (£16m) when they bought a successor company to Summy in the 1980s.
Warner/Chappell has made around $2m a year from royalty payments whenever the song is used in a film, television episode, advertisement, or other public performance. Warner/Chappell has made around $2m a year from royalty payments whenever the song is used in a film, television episode, advertisement or other public performance.