This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/08/world/europe/britain-conservative-party-conference-david-cameron.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
David Cameron, at Conservatives’ Conference, Strays From Party’s Themes David Cameron, at Conservatives’ Conference, Strays From Party’s Themes
(about 3 hours later)
MANCHESTER, England — Sensing a chance to occupy the political middle ground, Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain used a speech at the Conservative conference here on Wednesday to touch on themes not normally associated with his center-right party, promising an “all-out assault on poverty.” MANCHESTER, England — Sensing a chance to occupy the political center ground in his final term in office, Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain on Wednesday pledged to battle discrimination, fight for equality, help the poor find housing and make an “all-out assault on poverty.”
Mr. Cameron, closing the first convention since the Conservatives’ victory in May, pledged to battle to end discrimination and to fight for equality. Closing the Conservatives’ first party convention since their surprising election victory in May, Mr. Cameron returned to ideas he championed when he first won the leadership of his party in 2005, emphasizing a “modern, compassionate” conservatism that offered help to the destitute and aspiration to those who wanted to better themselves.
In returning to ideas he championed earlier in his career, including “modern, compassionate” Conservatism, he announced other, less-surprising initiatives, including plans to increase house construction and tackle Muslim religious schools that preach intolerance. He wants his period in power to be remembered as a “defining decade for our country,” a “turnaround decade,” he said, “when people no longer felt the current going against them, but working with them.”
Mr. Cameron said before the vote in May that he would not run for another term as prime minister, and, even though the next general election is not until 2020, the meeting in Manchester had been dominated by colleagues already maneuvering for his job. Mr. Cameron appears to have identified the political center as his for the taking, after an election victory in which the centrist Liberal Democrats, who had been in coalition with the Conservatives, slumped to just eight parliamentary seats, and the opposition Labour Party, which lost Scotland and did poorly in England, has now swung to the left.
The prime minister sought to reclaim the focus on Wednesday and made clear that he was not without his own political goals, promising a “turnaround decade” for Britain and telling internal rivals that he was “starting the second half of my time in this job.” At the same time, Mr. Cameron is committed, along with his close ally George Osborne, the chancellor of the Exchequer, to shrinking the size of the state and continuing austerity measures to cut deeply into government spending, including social welfare programs, to reduce Britain’s large deficit.
Mr. Cameron appears to have identified the middle ground as his for the taking. The May elections left the centrist Liberal Democrats, who had been in coalition with the Conservatives, with just eight parliamentary seats. And the opposition Labour Party has now swung to the left, electing as its leader Jeremy Corbyn, a veteran of the left-wing fringes. On security matters, Mr. Cameron took a more traditional Conservative line, talking of further moves to tackle Islamic extremism abroad in the shape of Islamic State and at home, targeting Muslim religious schools that, in his view, may be preaching intolerance. And he made a vicious attack on the new Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, saying, “We cannot let that man inflict his security-threatening, terrorist sympathizing, Britain-hating ideology on the country we love.”
In his speech, Mr. Cameron made an outspoken attack on Mr. Corbyn, whose ideas, he claimed, were “security-threatening, terrorist-sympathizing” and “Britain-hating.” With Mr. Cameron having said that he will step down as prime minister before the 2020 elections, even before the Conservatives’ resounding victory in May, the meeting in Manchester had been dominated by the attention-grabbing speeches of colleagues already maneuvering for his job.
He also announced that informal religious schools of all faiths would have to register for inspection, and that they could be closed down if they taught students intolerance. But on Wednesday Mr. Cameron sought to push that to one side, making it plain that he was not without his own political goals and was in no hurry to leave office, telling internal rivals that he was “starting the second half of my time in this job.”
“In some madrasas, we’ve got children being taught that they shouldn’t mix with people of other religions; being beaten; swallowing conspiracy theories about Jewish people,” he said, referring to Muslim religious schools. If Wednesday belonged to Mr. Cameron, Monday and Tuesday were auditions. On Monday, Mr. Osborne, a Cameron favorite, also sought to present the Conservatives as the party of the center, gleefully appropriating policies long associated with the Labour Party. Mr. Osborne proposed building up Britain with new infrastructure designed to spread wealth to the north of the country. Even if he was not sure that his idea of a “northern powerhouse” would succeed, he said, it would be worth the effort.
More striking was the spine of the speech, which highlighted the plight of those in poverty, the poor prospects of children in care, and the fact that those with “white-sounding names are nearly twice as likely to get callbacks for jobs than people with ethnic-sounding names.” On Tuesday, the home secretary, Theresa May, made a pitch for the right of the party, with harsh language about uncontrolled immigration and internal security. “When immigration is too high, when the pace of change is too fast, it’s impossible to build a cohesive society,” she said. She argued that immigration had little positive impact on the British economy, a position quickly disputed by some business people and academics.
“I want us to end discrimination and finish the fight for real equality in our country,” he added. But Ms. May’s main problem is that after five years in the job, she and Mr. Cameron have not reduced net immigration, in part because they cannot control other European Union citizens who are attracted to Britain for employment and are legally entitled to move there.
Jonathan Ashworth, a Labour shadow minister, said, “The Tories are failing working people.” Boris Johnson, the charismatic lawmaker and departing mayor of London, joined the beauty pageant with an appeal to “one nation,” or inclusive, conservatism in a speech that lavishly praised Mr. Cameron while also quietly criticizing him and Mr. Osborne for cutting tax credits to workers on low incomes. Mr. Johnson also kept open the possibility that he could support a British exit from the European Union in a referendum that Mr. Cameron has promised by the end of 2017.
“For all the talk of making life better for people, the truth is, David Cameron is doing the opposite,” Mr. Ashworth said. His speech was a reminder that despite their parliamentary majority, the Conservatives face their own internal strains, notably on issues including the European Union, immigration, welfare and even whether to build a third runway at the overcrowded Heathrow Airport (which Mr. Johnson loudly opposes).
The political positioning of the party has been the main theme of the conference, with potential successors to Mr. Cameron seizing the chance to make their pitches. Mr. Cameron’s promise to hold a referendum on British membership in the European Union has heightened passions on a subject that has been divisive for Conservatives since 1990, when the prime minister at the time, Margaret Thatcher, was ejected by her own party, partly because of her resistance to European integration.
In a powerful speech on Monday, George Osborne, chancellor of the Exchequer, also sought to present the Conservatives as the party of the center, gleefully appropriating a couple of the policies long associated with the Labour Party. Europe could also be a problem for Mr. Osborne, who has a leading role in renegotiating Britain’s terms of membership in the European Union. Should those talks fail, or voters reject membership in the referendum, his prospects would take a battering.
On Tuesday, attention was focused on the home secretary, Theresa May, who shifted her profile to the right with harsh language and a stark warning over rising immigration. If not controlled, she argued, migration threatened to make a “cohesive society” impossible. Not so for Mr. Johnson, who once reported from Brussels for The Daily Telegraph as a young and euroskeptic journalist, and who many say would benefit from a no vote. He took a few swipes at the bloc on Tuesday, while arguing that the health of British democracy depended on “getting the right deal now from our European Union partners, as I know David Cameron can.”
Then, lacing a highly political speech with trademark humor, Boris Johnson, the charismatic lawmaker and departing mayor of London, appealed to “one-nation,” or inclusive, Conservatives, while keeping open the possibility that he could back a British exit from the European Union in a referendum that Mr. Cameron has promised by the end of 2017.
Yet the Conservatives face their own internal strains, notably on issues including Europe, migration and welfare. Mr. Cameron’s promise to hold a referendum on British membership in the European Union has heightened passions on a subject that has been divisive for Conservatives since 1990, when the prime minister at the time, Margaret Thatcher, was ejected by her own party, partly because of her resistance to European integration.
Mr. Cameron has said he wants Britain to stay in the European Union, providing that he can negotiate an improvement in the country’s ties with the bloc before holding the vote. On Wednesday, without providing many new details about those talks, he repeated his hopes of ending the bloc’s largely symbolic commitment to “ever closer union.”
One of his demands is that Britain be allowed to impose restrictions on welfare entitlements to migrants.
The coalition government, which Mr. Cameron has led since 2010, has failed badly in trying to reach its stated goal of reducing net immigration to less than 100,000 a year.
Ms. May, who once appealed to Conservatives to shed their image as what she termed the “nasty party,” promised on Tuesday to shake up the asylum system, perhaps because there is little she can do to restrict migration from within the European Union.
Europe could also be a problem for Mr. Osborne, who has a leading role in the European Union renegotiation. Should the talks fail, or voters reject membership in the referendum, his prospects would take a battering.
Not so for Mr. Johnson, who once reported from Brussels for The Daily Telegraph as a young euroskeptic journalist, and who many say would benefit from a no vote. He took a few swipes at the bloc on Tuesday, while arguing that the health of British democracy depended on “getting the right deal now from our European Union partners, as I know David Cameron can.”
He seemed to be taking aim at Mr. Osborne’s plans to restrict tax credits, which subsidize low earners, changes that are likely to hurt some families on low incomes.He seemed to be taking aim at Mr. Osborne’s plans to restrict tax credits, which subsidize low earners, changes that are likely to hurt some families on low incomes.
“We must ensure that as we reform welfare and we cut taxes that we protect the hardest working and lowest paid: shop workers, cleaners, the people who get up in the small hours or work through the night,” Mr. Johnson said.“We must ensure that as we reform welfare and we cut taxes that we protect the hardest working and lowest paid: shop workers, cleaners, the people who get up in the small hours or work through the night,” Mr. Johnson said.
Among the contenders to succeed Mr. Cameron, Mr. Osborne is currently the man to beat, because his stewardship of the economy since 2010 is credited by many with bringing the Conservatives election victory. However, he has long struggled to connect with the public. Among the contenders to succeed Mr. Cameron, Mr. Osborne is seen as the man to beat, because his stewardship of the economy since 2010 is credited by many with bringing the Conservatives election victory, but he has long struggled to connect with the public.
“Something about his black curls and pale face,” Charles Moore, a former editor of The Daily Telegraph, wrote of Mr. Osborne in 2008, “make him look like a powdered French aristocrat in 1790 staring affrighted from the window of his carriage as the sans-culottes start trying to turn it over.” More recently, others have likened his new haircut to that of Julius Caesar.“Something about his black curls and pale face,” Charles Moore, a former editor of The Daily Telegraph, wrote of Mr. Osborne in 2008, “make him look like a powdered French aristocrat in 1790 staring affrighted from the window of his carriage as the sans-culottes start trying to turn it over.” More recently, others have likened his new haircut to that of Julius Caesar.
Mr. Osborne has made a concerted effort to humanize his image, and, in a preconference interview in The Mail on Sunday, he discussed how he wooed his wife, how he went on a diet for fear of becoming “fat and flabby,” and his fondness for the rap group N.W.A.Mr. Osborne has made a concerted effort to humanize his image, and, in a preconference interview in The Mail on Sunday, he discussed how he wooed his wife, how he went on a diet for fear of becoming “fat and flabby,” and his fondness for the rap group N.W.A.