This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/08/second-solar-firm-in-two-days-goes-bust-blaming-tory-policy

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Second solar firm in two days goes bust, blaming UK government policy Second solar firm in two days goes bust, blaming UK government policy
(about 2 hours later)
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) has denied subsidy cuts were responsible for the collapse of two solar panel installers in as many days, blaming the company failures on “commercial decisions”. The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has denied that subsidy cuts were responsible for the collapse of two solar panel installers in as many days, blaming the company failures on “commercial decisions”.
Amid warnings of a crisis in the green energy sector following the failure of Mark Group and Climate Energy and a forecast that 20,000 solar jobs could eventually be threatened, the Decc defended aid cuts for solar and energy efficiency. Amid warnings of a crisis in the green energy sector following the failure of Mark Group and Climate Energy and a forecast that 20,000 solar jobs could eventually be threatened, the DECC defended aid cuts for solar and energy efficiency.
Related: Solar-panel installer goes into administration, costing 1,000 jobs “All job losses are regrettable and we sympathise with those affected, but commercial decisions are a matter for the company concerned,” said a DECC spokesman. “Our priority is to keep bills as low as possible for hardworking families and businesses, and to build a long-term energy-efficiency system that gives consumers value for money. We are protecting existing investment and billpayers, while reducing our emissions in the most cost-effective way,” he said.
“All job losses are regrettable and we sympathise with those affected, but commercial decisions are a matter for the company concerned,” said a DECC spokesman. “Our priority is to keep bills as low as possible for hardworking families and businesses, and to build a long-term energy efficiency system that gives consumers value for money. We are protecting existing investment and billpayers, while reducing our emissions in the most cost-effective way,” he said. Related: It could be lights out for solar power under this government
However, the dramatic demise of two leading companies following a series of cuts, and proposals for more, brought a furious reaction from environmental and trade groups.However, the dramatic demise of two leading companies following a series of cuts, and proposals for more, brought a furious reaction from environmental and trade groups.
Friends of the Earth energy campaigner Alasdair Cameron said: “Government policy threatens over 20,000 UK solar jobs – with many more at risk in other green sectors. It seems the Treasury is happier to give sky-high subsidies to Chinese nuclear power than support British solar. A Friends of the Earth energy campaigner, Alasdair Cameron, said: “Government policy threatens over 20,000 UK solar jobs – with many more at risk in other green sectors. It seems the Treasury is happier to give sky-high subsidies to Chinese nuclear power than support British solar.
The renewable energy industry around the world is booming and costs are falling rapidly but the UK government seems to be stuck in the wrong century.”The renewable energy industry around the world is booming and costs are falling rapidly but the UK government seems to be stuck in the wrong century.”
Neil Marshall, chief executive of the National Insulation Association, called for urgent help from ministers to avoid further company closures, job cuts and loss of confidence. “While the government has outlined its intention to introduce a new long-term policy framework for energy efficiency, which we welcome, the insulation industry is currently in a state of crisis.”Neil Marshall, chief executive of the National Insulation Association, called for urgent help from ministers to avoid further company closures, job cuts and loss of confidence. “While the government has outlined its intention to introduce a new long-term policy framework for energy efficiency, which we welcome, the insulation industry is currently in a state of crisis.”
After almost 1,000 redundancies on Wednesday at the Mark Group after it was forced to call in administrators from Deloitte amid mounting financial losses, solar panel and insulation installers Climate Energy also folded into administration, blaming government policies. After almost 1,000 redundancies on Wednesday at the Mark Group after it was forced to call in administrators from Deloitte amid mounting financial losses, the solar panel and insulation installers Climate Energy also folded into administration, blaming government policies.
Related: UK solar firms going bust - what consumers need to know About 30 of Climate Energy’s 128 staff have been immediately laid off by FTI Consulting, the professional services firm brought in to try to rescue the firm and its subsidiaries, which had revenues of £47m last year.
Around 30 of Climate Energy’s 128 staff have been immediately laid off by FTI Consulting, the professional services firm brought in to try to rescue the firm and its subsidiaries, which had revenues of £47m last year. The administrators said the company, which has offices in Bristol, Croydon and Motherwell as well as headquarters in Witham, Essex, said solar-subsidy cuts were a “contributory factor” in Climate Energy’s demise.
The administrators said the company, which has offices in Bristol, Croydon and Motherwell as well as headquarters in Witham, Essex, said solar subsidy cuts were a “contributory factor” in Climate Energy’s demise.
The Mark Group was, until hours before its failure, owned by the major US group SunEdison, which passed the Leicester-based business on to its managers who immediately announced it was insolvent.The Mark Group was, until hours before its failure, owned by the major US group SunEdison, which passed the Leicester-based business on to its managers who immediately announced it was insolvent.
Mark Babcock, vice-president of SunEdison’s residential and commercial business unit in Europe, pointedly blamed the government for Mark Group’s problems: “Given the latest changes and proposed changes to the feed-in tariff [subsidy regime], it is difficult to see [Britain] as a viable market going forward.”Mark Babcock, vice-president of SunEdison’s residential and commercial business unit in Europe, pointedly blamed the government for Mark Group’s problems: “Given the latest changes and proposed changes to the feed-in tariff [subsidy regime], it is difficult to see [Britain] as a viable market going forward.”
In the months since the general election and Amber Rudd taking over as secretary of state for energy and climate change, there has been a major change in policy direction.In the months since the general election and Amber Rudd taking over as secretary of state for energy and climate change, there has been a major change in policy direction.
A range of cuts have been made to wind, solar and energy-efficiency subsidies – the latest a consultation on a proposed 87% reduction in financial aid for householders installing solar panels. Rudd argues that continuing subsidies are no longer needed at past levels because technology costs have fallen while other consumers need to be protected from higher energy bills.
Figures published by the regulator Ofgem and other sources show the rate of solar subsidies for small-scale rooftop installations dropping from 41.3p per kilowatt hour in 2010 to a proposed level of 1.63p while costs have stagnated over the last 12 months. It would take 25 years for an investment in solar to pay back under the proposed new scheme, which is under consultation for implementation in January, 2016.
Related: The nine green policies killed off by the Tory governmentRelated: The nine green policies killed off by the Tory government
A range of cuts have been made to wind, solar and energy efficiency subsidies – the latest a consultation on a proposed 87% reduction in financial aid for householders installing solar panels. Rudd argues that continuing subsidies are no longer needed at past levels because technology costs have fallen while other consumers need to be protected from higher energy bills. Critics believe the attack on subsidies is driven by the chancellor, George Osborne, as part of a wider austerity policy and as a means to please Conservative backbenchers, who believe “green” power is expensive and unnecessary.
Figures published by regulator Ofgem and other sources show the rate of solar subsidies for small-scale rooftop installations dropping from 41.3p per kilowatt hour in 2010 to a proposed level of 1.63p while costs have stagnated over the last 12 months. It would take 25 years for an investment in solar to pay back under the proposed new scheme which is under consultation for implementation in January, 2016. Boris Johnson, the Conservative leadership hopeful, and a small number of other MPs have expressed disquiet about the cuts. On Thursday night, the Tory MP David Warburton, described the proposed cuts as “draconian”.
Critics believe the attack on subsidies is driven by the chancellor, George Osborne. as part of a wider austerity policy and as a means to please Conservative backbenchers who believe “green” power is expensive and unnecessary.
Boris Johnson, the Conservative leadership hopeful, and a small number of other MPs have expressed disquiet about the cuts. On Thursday night, Tory MP David Warburton, described the proposed cuts as “draconian”.
The MP for Somerton and Frome said: “We know the solar industry fully expected some rationalisation, but a drop of up to 87% in subsidies overnight is draconian and more than I suspect the industry can bear.”The MP for Somerton and Frome said: “We know the solar industry fully expected some rationalisation, but a drop of up to 87% in subsidies overnight is draconian and more than I suspect the industry can bear.”