This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/public-could-have-to-pay-100-to-make-freedom-of-information-requests-under-right-to-know-crackdown-a6688581.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Public could have to pay £100 to make Freedom of Information Requests under right-to-know crackdown Public could have to pay £100 to make Freedom of Information Requests under right-to-know crackdown
(2 days later)
Members of the public could be charged up to £100 to submit requests for information to councils, police forces or the Government under a right-to-know crackdown.Members of the public could be charged up to £100 to submit requests for information to councils, police forces or the Government under a right-to-know crackdown.
A commission set up by ministers to examine changes to Britain’s Freedom of Information regulations has confirmed that it was looking at copying countries such as Germany, New Zealand and Ireland which charge individuals to make requests.A commission set up by ministers to examine changes to Britain’s Freedom of Information regulations has confirmed that it was looking at copying countries such as Germany, New Zealand and Ireland which charge individuals to make requests.
The review will also examine whether cabinet ministers should be given greater powers to veto information requests and if some exempted categories should be extended.The review will also examine whether cabinet ministers should be given greater powers to veto information requests and if some exempted categories should be extended.
While the commission has yet to suggest a fee structure, Germany usually charges €50 (£37) to €100 per request, although this can be as high as €500. New Zealand levies $38 (£16) for each 30 minutes spent collating information after the first hour.While the commission has yet to suggest a fee structure, Germany usually charges €50 (£37) to €100 per request, although this can be as high as €500. New Zealand levies $38 (£16) for each 30 minutes spent collating information after the first hour.
Although the commission made a public call for evidence on the topic, campaigners fear its result will be a foregone conclusion. At least one of its five members, Jack Straw, is a critic of the Freedom of Information Act; the chair is a former senior Whitehall official, and there is no representative of any group known to be in favour of keeping the legislation as it stands.Although the commission made a public call for evidence on the topic, campaigners fear its result will be a foregone conclusion. At least one of its five members, Jack Straw, is a critic of the Freedom of Information Act; the chair is a former senior Whitehall official, and there is no representative of any group known to be in favour of keeping the legislation as it stands.
The commission has given itself just 20 working days to analyse all the evidence submitted to it, reach a conclusion, write and publish its report.The commission has given itself just 20 working days to analyse all the evidence submitted to it, reach a conclusion, write and publish its report.
Working for the Stop Hinkley campaign group, nuclear engineer John Large analysed papers that revealed cracks in the graphite bricks that are part of the nuclear reactor’s core.
Getty
BBC Radio 5 Live obtained figures from the Home Office Taser database which showed that more than 400 children had Tasers drawn on them in 2013 – 38 per cent higher than 2012.
Oli Scarff/Getty Images
The Sunday Times reported that British hospitals, including Addenbrookes in  Cambridge, incinerated  miscarried and aborted  foetuses as clinical waste.
An investigation by the Manchester Evening News uncovered secret files showing how the late Liberal MP confronted police at Rochdale police station and tried to dissuade them from investigating claims that he had been sexually abusing young boys. This was one of countless examples of the local and regional press using FoI to great investigative effect.
Getty
A series of FoI requests by The Guardian and Channel 4 have resulted in the emergence of information that would otherwise have remained secret about British troops’ alleged involvement in the killing or wounding of around 100 Afghan civilians. Much of the information related to compensation paid by the MoD to victims’ families.
AP
A long-running battle in 2011 and 2012, between journalists and the Department for Education, culminated in the resignation of an aide to Michael Gove, Dominic Cummings, in 2013. The DfE had been criticised over the use of private email accounts for departmental business, an obstructive approach to Freedom of Information requests, and aggressive communications to journalists.
Getty Images
A long-running legal battle, relating to claims of royal and ministerial exemption from FoI, culminated in the publication this year of correspondence in which the Prince of Wales lobbied ministers on subjects ranging from homeopathy to the Patagonian tooth fish.
Getty
The publication by The Daily Telegraph in June and July 2009 of leaked details of MPs’ expenses was the last,  spectacular act in an investigative saga that began in 2005 with two separate  FoI requests by the journalists Heather Brooke and Jon  Ungoed-Thomas. 
AP
Bizarrely, at a press briefing to announce the call for evidence, a senior commission figure refused to be quoted by name despite claiming “our aim is to be as open as possible”.Bizarrely, at a press briefing to announce the call for evidence, a senior commission figure refused to be quoted by name despite claiming “our aim is to be as open as possible”.
Critics believe that the body has been set up to come to pre-ordained conclusions. Maurice Frankel, director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said the commission was looking at “a very wide range of potential restrictions”.Critics believe that the body has been set up to come to pre-ordained conclusions. Maurice Frankel, director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said the commission was looking at “a very wide range of potential restrictions”.
He added that fees for requests would be worrying. In Ireland, when a €15 application fee was introduced, it resulted in the number of requests falling by 75 per cent.He added that fees for requests would be worrying. In Ireland, when a €15 application fee was introduced, it resulted in the number of requests falling by 75 per cent.
“For most people, a single charge for a single request might not be a problem, except for people on low incomes,” he said. “But … many people legitimately need to make more than a single request.“For most people, a single charge for a single request might not be a problem, except for people on low incomes,” he said. “But … many people legitimately need to make more than a single request.
“It would make the FoI Act inaccessible for individual requesters and small and medium organisations, as well as for freelance journalists.”“It would make the FoI Act inaccessible for individual requesters and small and medium organisations, as well as for freelance journalists.”
Donald Campbell, of the legal charity Reprieve, added: “It is deeply worrying that the commission is proposing charging the public for information that they have a right to.Donald Campbell, of the legal charity Reprieve, added: “It is deeply worrying that the commission is proposing charging the public for information that they have a right to.
“Freedom of Information is a crucial tool for keeping our politicians honest and our Government on the right track. It should be available to everyone without cost.”“Freedom of Information is a crucial tool for keeping our politicians honest and our Government on the right track. It should be available to everyone without cost.”
Lord Burns, the commission’s chair, said: “We want to hear the views of as many people as possible…  The commission is an independent body, with no predetermined view, and is interested in gathering as much objective evidence as possible on the questions posed in the call for evidence.”Lord Burns, the commission’s chair, said: “We want to hear the views of as many people as possible…  The commission is an independent body, with no predetermined view, and is interested in gathering as much objective evidence as possible on the questions posed in the call for evidence.”