This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/21/michael-meacher-an-environment-minister-who-stood-up-for-his-beliefs

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Michael Meacher: an environment minister who stood up for his beliefs Michael Meacher: an environment minister who stood up for his beliefs
(about 1 hour later)
Michael Meacher was a remarkable environment minister because for six years, at the start of the Blair government, he almost single-handedly fought to defend the natural world from road-building, the first generation of GM crops and rampant industrialisation.Michael Meacher was a remarkable environment minister because for six years, at the start of the Blair government, he almost single-handedly fought to defend the natural world from road-building, the first generation of GM crops and rampant industrialisation.
While junior environment ministers usually accept the Treasury or No 10 line without question, “the Meach”, as he was widely known, stood up to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and possibly saved the administration from political embarrassment by urging caution at key moments.While junior environment ministers usually accept the Treasury or No 10 line without question, “the Meach”, as he was widely known, stood up to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and possibly saved the administration from political embarrassment by urging caution at key moments.
His first task was to extricate Blair from the potential embarrassment of introducing GM crops. Blair had been persuaded by David Sainsbury, head of a large food multinational, that GM crops were the future and posed no danger to consumers. But with public opinion strongly against them, Meacher defused the debate by negotiating a three-year moratorium during which further tests were done. By pleading caution, he gained the trust of both hostile environment groups and wary consumers. His first task was to extricate Blair from the potential embarrassment of introducing GM crops. Blair had been persuaded by David Sainsbury, the head of a large food multinational, that GM crops were the future and posed no danger to consumers. But with public opinion strongly against them, Meacher defused the debate by negotiating a three-year moratorium during which further tests were done. By pleading caution, he gained the trust of both hostile environment groups and wary consumers.
Related: Veteran Labour MP Michael Meacher dies aged 75Related: Veteran Labour MP Michael Meacher dies aged 75
He was widely disliked in No 10 and was denied a cabinet position, but he survived in environment possibly because Blair feared that he would be a dangerous backbencher with scientific credibility. He was widely disliked in No 10 and was denied a cabinet position, but he survived in the environment job possibly because Blair feared that he would be a dangerous backbencher with scientific credibility.
My colleague, the environment correspondent Paul Brown, wrote in 2002: “The prime minister’s impatience with Michael Meacher, who is seen by No 10 to stand in his way, became public when Mr Blair tried to drop his environment minister from the team attending the Earth summit in Johannesburg in 2002. My colleague, the environment correspondent Paul Brown, wrote in 2002: “The prime minister’s impatience with Michael Meacher, the only minister who urges caution and is seen by No 10 to stand in his way, became public when Mr Blair tried to drop his environment minister from the team attending the Earth summit in Johannesburg in 2002. After public protest John Prescott, the deputy prime minister, reinstated him – but it was not the first time Mr Meacher and Mr Blair had crossed swords.
“After public protest John Prescott, the deputy prime minister, reinstated him – but it was not the first time Mr Meacher and Mr Blair had crossed swords. During the mini-reshuffle brought about by the resignation of Stephen Byers from transport, Mr Blair tried to push Mr Meacher into a less high-profile post. It is said that Mr Meacher threatened to resign from the government altogether rather than be moved.” “During the mini-reshuffle brought about by the resignation of Stephen Byers from transport, Mr Blair tried to push Mr Meacher into a less high profile post. It is said that Mr Meacher threatened to resign from the government altogether rather than be moved.”
When he finally left government in 2003, Meacher became a strong voice for environment protection, urging government and personal action on climate change, which he grasped as the most important long-term issue of the time.When he finally left government in 2003, Meacher became a strong voice for environment protection, urging government and personal action on climate change, which he grasped as the most important long-term issue of the time.
But he will be remembered especially for steering through the “right to roam” legislation, which surprised and delighted ramblers and Labour backbenchers even as it infuriated landowners by promising a statutory right to roam across 1.6m hectares (4m acres) of open countryside in England and Wales. But he will be remembered especially for steering through the “right to roam” legislation, which surprised and delighted ramblers and Labour backbenchers even as it infuriated landowners by promising a statutory right of access to 1.6m hectares (4m acres) of open countryside in England and Wales.
The commitment, which was explicitly linked by Meacher to the memory of the late Labour leader and keen fellwalker John Smith, reassured many Labour MPs who had feared Blair would be swayed by pressure from the powerful countryside lobby to abandon a principle close to party’s heart since its inception.The commitment, which was explicitly linked by Meacher to the memory of the late Labour leader and keen fellwalker John Smith, reassured many Labour MPs who had feared Blair would be swayed by pressure from the powerful countryside lobby to abandon a principle close to party’s heart since its inception.