This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/21/lord-brittan-investigation-was-baseless-witch-hunt

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Lord Brittan rape investigation was 'baseless witch hunt' Lord Brittan rape investigation was 'baseless witch-hunt'
(about 1 hour later)
A detective in charge of the rape investigation into Lord Brittan said the decision to interview the former cabinet minister was a “baseless witch hunt”, while one of his bosses said it was needed to make sure the job had been done thoroughly.A detective in charge of the rape investigation into Lord Brittan said the decision to interview the former cabinet minister was a “baseless witch hunt”, while one of his bosses said it was needed to make sure the job had been done thoroughly.
Detective Chief Inspector Paul Settle told MPs on the home affairs select committee that his investigation found nothing to support a claim from a woman that Lord Brittan had raped her in 1967. He said there was thus no lawful basis to interview Brittan, under criminal caution.Detective Chief Inspector Paul Settle told MPs on the home affairs select committee that his investigation found nothing to support a claim from a woman that Lord Brittan had raped her in 1967. He said there was thus no lawful basis to interview Brittan, under criminal caution.
Settle appeared before MPs amid claims he had felt pressured by a letter from the Labour MP Tom Watson, written to the director of public prosecutions (DPP), which said Brittan should be interviewed over the rape claims.Settle appeared before MPs amid claims he had felt pressured by a letter from the Labour MP Tom Watson, written to the director of public prosecutions (DPP), which said Brittan should be interviewed over the rape claims.
Settle said his view that there was no point continuing the investigation and decision to stand his ground led his bosses to move him from his post. He claimed Watson’s letter caused “panic” at Scotland Yard. But he later conceded that a decision to review his decision to stop the investigation may have been made before Watson even wrote his letter.Settle said his view that there was no point continuing the investigation and decision to stand his ground led his bosses to move him from his post. He claimed Watson’s letter caused “panic” at Scotland Yard. But he later conceded that a decision to review his decision to stop the investigation may have been made before Watson even wrote his letter.
Settle said in September 2013 he consulted the Crown Prosecution Service and at that point decided the investigation should cease: “My reason for that was that I concluded that any action against Lord Brittan would be grossly disproportionate and would not have a legal basis as, in order to interview him, we would have to have had reasonable grounds to suspect that an [offence] had been committed.Settle said in September 2013 he consulted the Crown Prosecution Service and at that point decided the investigation should cease: “My reason for that was that I concluded that any action against Lord Brittan would be grossly disproportionate and would not have a legal basis as, in order to interview him, we would have to have had reasonable grounds to suspect that an [offence] had been committed.
“The investigation had shown that whilst an allegation had been made, the offence had not been made out in law and as such those reasonable grounds had ceased.”“The investigation had shown that whilst an allegation had been made, the offence had not been made out in law and as such those reasonable grounds had ceased.”
Settle said of Watson that the Labour MP acted as a conduit for people who said they had been victims of abuse and three convictions had resulted.Settle said of Watson that the Labour MP acted as a conduit for people who said they had been victims of abuse and three convictions had resulted.
But the senior detective said Watson’s letter to the DPP was a “betrayal” because he felt he and the MP had a good relationship and he had kept him updated on the investigation’s progress.But the senior detective said Watson’s letter to the DPP was a “betrayal” because he felt he and the MP had a good relationship and he had kept him updated on the investigation’s progress.
Deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse said there were investigative steps Settle had not done. He said an interview of Brittan could help investigators to prove or disprove allegations.Deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse said there were investigative steps Settle had not done. He said an interview of Brittan could help investigators to prove or disprove allegations.
Rodhouse said there were “reasonable grounds” to suspect Brittan of rape and that an offence had taken place, on the basis of what “Jane”, the victim, had said. Critics say her testimony was riddled with errors.Rodhouse said there were “reasonable grounds” to suspect Brittan of rape and that an offence had taken place, on the basis of what “Jane”, the victim, had said. Critics say her testimony was riddled with errors.
He said the case was “close cut” and it was vital the “public had reassurance that we had fully examined all the material”, which is why he wanted a specialist rape prosecutor at the CPS to review the case, to see if the police view that Brittan had no case to answer was correct.He said the case was “close cut” and it was vital the “public had reassurance that we had fully examined all the material”, which is why he wanted a specialist rape prosecutor at the CPS to review the case, to see if the police view that Brittan had no case to answer was correct.