This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2015/oct/22/eric-abetz-declares-renewed-marriage-equality-push-an-ambush-politics-live

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Labor builds the pressure over marriage equality – politics live Labor builds the pressure over marriage equality – politics live
(6 days later)
6.59am BST6.59am BST
06:5906:59
Like a bird, I must flyLike a bird, I must fly
Well peeps, it’s been real. I have to shut shop a bit early this evening to get ready to chat to my good friends on The Drum.Well peeps, it’s been real. I have to shut shop a bit early this evening to get ready to chat to my good friends on The Drum.
With my usual thanks and salutations, let’s wrap with some thoughts on the political week.With my usual thanks and salutations, let’s wrap with some thoughts on the political week.
Malcolm Turnbull made momentum a priority. A big policy week. He delivered the response to the Murray financial services inquiry, family benefits overhaul 2.0, and a deal with Labor on the China FTA.Malcolm Turnbull made momentum a priority. A big policy week. He delivered the response to the Murray financial services inquiry, family benefits overhaul 2.0, and a deal with Labor on the China FTA.
Conservative opponents thought this TurnBullRun might be getting a little out of hand. A plan by marriage equality supporters to put flesh on the bones of the plebiscite was pounced on by Eric Abetz, who saw treachery. The losers from the leadership change strutted and fretted, ever so slightly.Conservative opponents thought this TurnBullRun might be getting a little out of hand. A plan by marriage equality supporters to put flesh on the bones of the plebiscite was pounced on by Eric Abetz, who saw treachery. The losers from the leadership change strutted and fretted, ever so slightly.
New social services minister Christian Porter was pushed out into the spotlight courtesy of the families package. Unfortunately he looked as though he hadn’t quite mastered his Canberra legs. It wasn’t a total disaster, but it wasn’t a triumph either.New social services minister Christian Porter was pushed out into the spotlight courtesy of the families package. Unfortunately he looked as though he hadn’t quite mastered his Canberra legs. It wasn’t a total disaster, but it wasn’t a triumph either.
Labor did slightly better in working out how to approach the TurnBullRun. Playing the man had sunk like a stone. The opposition found some grip by playing the issues – but at this stage, you’d much rather be Malcolm Turnbull than Bill Shorten.Labor did slightly better in working out how to approach the TurnBullRun. Playing the man had sunk like a stone. The opposition found some grip by playing the issues – but at this stage, you’d much rather be Malcolm Turnbull than Bill Shorten.
Stepping back from the contest, considering the bigger picture, a few observations.Stepping back from the contest, considering the bigger picture, a few observations.
Australian politics is no longer completely excruciating to watch. The volume has been lowered to manageable levels, and the crushing binary constructs of Abbottism have departed with the man. For now at least. We can only hope this continues.Australian politics is no longer completely excruciating to watch. The volume has been lowered to manageable levels, and the crushing binary constructs of Abbottism have departed with the man. For now at least. We can only hope this continues.
We have had a week largely debating significant issues in orderly fashion, in reasonable temper. Turnbull is trying to hold himself in a position above the fray, which is exactly what the country needs in order to recover from the recent past.We have had a week largely debating significant issues in orderly fashion, in reasonable temper. Turnbull is trying to hold himself in a position above the fray, which is exactly what the country needs in order to recover from the recent past.
But of course many challenges abound. Problems are hard to solve. There are winners and losers. Civility is a function of the conditions that make civility possible. This could all just be a little port in a storm.But of course many challenges abound. Problems are hard to solve. There are winners and losers. Civility is a function of the conditions that make civility possible. This could all just be a little port in a storm.
Turnbull this week has exhibited his great strengths, and his weaknesses too. There is ego. Periodically, there is Malsplaining™. There is a belief that charm can transcend all difficulty. It can’t always.Turnbull this week has exhibited his great strengths, and his weaknesses too. There is ego. Periodically, there is Malsplaining™. There is a belief that charm can transcend all difficulty. It can’t always.
But there is reason, and there is order, and there is a sense that the office of prime minister can be a place to do good, not just rout enemies, and indulge in circular feuds.But there is reason, and there is order, and there is a sense that the office of prime minister can be a place to do good, not just rout enemies, and indulge in circular feuds.
Bottom line? It’s safe to tune back in. For a while at least. I for one want to know how this story ends.Bottom line? It’s safe to tune back in. For a while at least. I for one want to know how this story ends.
Until we meet again, be well.Until we meet again, be well.
6.31am BST6.31am BST
06:3106:31
And from my colleague Paul Farrell:And from my colleague Paul Farrell:
Save the Children staff on Nauru have faced a second series of raids in a further bid to find journalists’ sources at the immigration detention centre on the island. On Thursday morning the Nauruan police force sent in a team of officers who searched buildings at RPC3 (Refugee Processing Centre 3) in the detention centre. Laptops, personal phones, desktop computers and other devices were seized after searches of the Save the Children recreation office and the welfare tent at the centre. The police had a warrant, but it was unclear what its terms were and what offence they were investigating.Save the Children staff on Nauru have faced a second series of raids in a further bid to find journalists’ sources at the immigration detention centre on the island. On Thursday morning the Nauruan police force sent in a team of officers who searched buildings at RPC3 (Refugee Processing Centre 3) in the detention centre. Laptops, personal phones, desktop computers and other devices were seized after searches of the Save the Children recreation office and the welfare tent at the centre. The police had a warrant, but it was unclear what its terms were and what offence they were investigating.
6.28am BST6.28am BST
06:2806:28
Some other news this afternoon, the Commonwealth Bank has lifted mortgage rates by 0.15 percentage points. The move follows a decision by Westpac last week. And it follows the government’s response to the Murray review of financial services. Banks have already warned they will pass on the costs of their higher capital requirements to consumers or shareholders. The government has said what banks do is a matter for them, but the treasurer Scott Morrison has been implicitly critical of the rate hike (now hikes). He’s argued when small businesses face an increase in their operating costs, they tend to absorb them. Big companies tend to pass them on.Some other news this afternoon, the Commonwealth Bank has lifted mortgage rates by 0.15 percentage points. The move follows a decision by Westpac last week. And it follows the government’s response to the Murray review of financial services. Banks have already warned they will pass on the costs of their higher capital requirements to consumers or shareholders. The government has said what banks do is a matter for them, but the treasurer Scott Morrison has been implicitly critical of the rate hike (now hikes). He’s argued when small businesses face an increase in their operating costs, they tend to absorb them. Big companies tend to pass them on.
6.14am BST6.14am BST
06:1406:14
While my eyes have been elsewhere, the president of the Fair Work Commission has been in the hot seat at estimates.While my eyes have been elsewhere, the president of the Fair Work Commission has been in the hot seat at estimates.
This appearance follows his cameo in this week’s Four Corners program. Michael Lawler, partner of former HSU official Kathy Jackson, secretly recorded a conversation he had with Iain Ross concerning his extended leave.This appearance follows his cameo in this week’s Four Corners program. Michael Lawler, partner of former HSU official Kathy Jackson, secretly recorded a conversation he had with Iain Ross concerning his extended leave.
I’m grateful to AAP for this report.I’m grateful to AAP for this report.
The president of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed he ticked off on more than 200 days of sick leave for his deputy Michael Lawler. But Iain Ross told a Senate estimates hearing in Canberra on Thursday he did not know Lawler was spending the time supporting his partner, former Health Services Union boss Kathy Jackson, defend herself in court. Justice Ross also denied he told Lawler he was entitled to unlimited leave.The president of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed he ticked off on more than 200 days of sick leave for his deputy Michael Lawler. But Iain Ross told a Senate estimates hearing in Canberra on Thursday he did not know Lawler was spending the time supporting his partner, former Health Services Union boss Kathy Jackson, defend herself in court. Justice Ross also denied he told Lawler he was entitled to unlimited leave.
Lawler has said there was “absolutely nothing wrong with taking leave to help your partner defend herself against unjust attacks”.Lawler has said there was “absolutely nothing wrong with taking leave to help your partner defend herself against unjust attacks”.
“In fact, I would have thought most Australians would regard that as an honourable and decent thing to do,” he told ABC TV’s Four Corners program this week. But Justice Ross disagreed, telling senators he only approved the leave on the basis Lawler was medically unfit to do his job.“In fact, I would have thought most Australians would regard that as an honourable and decent thing to do,” he told ABC TV’s Four Corners program this week. But Justice Ross disagreed, telling senators he only approved the leave on the basis Lawler was medically unfit to do his job.
The commission president also revealed he did not consent to the recording of phone conversations between himself and Lawler, which were aired during the program. “I was not informed by vice-president Lawler that he was recording,” he told the hearing.The commission president also revealed he did not consent to the recording of phone conversations between himself and Lawler, which were aired during the program. “I was not informed by vice-president Lawler that he was recording,” he told the hearing.
Justice Ross welcomed the federal government’s decision to appoint an independent investigator to look into complaints about Lawler’s leave. The recordings were properly a matter for consideration in that investigation, he said. Justice Ross said he had tried to treat Lawler with care and understanding through 2014 and 2015.Justice Ross welcomed the federal government’s decision to appoint an independent investigator to look into complaints about Lawler’s leave. The recordings were properly a matter for consideration in that investigation, he said. Justice Ross said he had tried to treat Lawler with care and understanding through 2014 and 2015.
“I am profoundly disappointed by his actions,” he said.“I am profoundly disappointed by his actions,” he said.
6.04am BST6.04am BST
06:0406:04
How Mike Bowers saw the chamber this question time session, just a couple of choice shots.How Mike Bowers saw the chamber this question time session, just a couple of choice shots.
5.58am BST5.58am BST
05:5805:58
Pictures are coming, but I’m just going to lift Sophia McGrane out of the thread so top of the line readers can see her point, which aptly sums up the family benefits debate in question time today.Pictures are coming, but I’m just going to lift Sophia McGrane out of the thread so top of the line readers can see her point, which aptly sums up the family benefits debate in question time today.
Sophia, on why the new social services minister Christian Porter doesn’t entirely comprehend the context of his own reforms:Sophia, on why the new social services minister Christian Porter doesn’t entirely comprehend the context of his own reforms:
I am a grandparent carer of two children, one aged 12 who suffered trauma as an infant having been exposed to prolonged domestic violence until he came to live with us aged 18months; he also is diagnosed autistic. The second child, now aged 9, was delivered to us at 5pm on a Sunday afternoon aged 7 hours old having only learned at 10am that morning that she needed immediate care.. I was in my middle 40’s when we took care of this wee baby but was forced to resign from my job because, as a grandparent carer, I wasn’t entitled to maternity leave.. I’m now in my middle 50’s having been out of the workforce for 9 years.. my autistic boy can’t attend school full time and on occasion needs collecting from school if he has a melt down ... so who’s gonna employ me?I am a grandparent carer of two children, one aged 12 who suffered trauma as an infant having been exposed to prolonged domestic violence until he came to live with us aged 18months; he also is diagnosed autistic. The second child, now aged 9, was delivered to us at 5pm on a Sunday afternoon aged 7 hours old having only learned at 10am that morning that she needed immediate care.. I was in my middle 40’s when we took care of this wee baby but was forced to resign from my job because, as a grandparent carer, I wasn’t entitled to maternity leave.. I’m now in my middle 50’s having been out of the workforce for 9 years.. my autistic boy can’t attend school full time and on occasion needs collecting from school if he has a melt down ... so who’s gonna employ me?
Assuming this story is a true representation of Sophia’s circumstances, assuming good faith – this comment demonstrates why snakes and ladders isn’t Porter’s strongest rhetorical suit.Assuming this story is a true representation of Sophia’s circumstances, assuming good faith – this comment demonstrates why snakes and ladders isn’t Porter’s strongest rhetorical suit.
5.44am BST5.44am BST
05:4405:44
Question time is over. I’ll give you some pictures very shortly.Question time is over. I’ll give you some pictures very shortly.
5.42am BST5.42am BST
05:4205:42
Righting the great rout of 1999: a few thoughts on Turnbull and the plebisciteRighting the great rout of 1999: a few thoughts on Turnbull and the plebiscite
A couple of observations about those two marriage equality answers.A couple of observations about those two marriage equality answers.
Turnbull sought to do several things at once today. He sought to calm things down, saying the mechanics of the plebiscite would work through the normal party processes. No captain’s picks.Turnbull sought to do several things at once today. He sought to calm things down, saying the mechanics of the plebiscite would work through the normal party processes. No captain’s picks.
While soothing ruffled feathers, he also sought to send a very clear message to conservatives in his own ranks: I’m about getting this done. The plebiscite is not to be a stalling tactic, or a trick, in Turnbull’s mind, it is the means of getting marriage equality passed.While soothing ruffled feathers, he also sought to send a very clear message to conservatives in his own ranks: I’m about getting this done. The plebiscite is not to be a stalling tactic, or a trick, in Turnbull’s mind, it is the means of getting marriage equality passed.
Turnbull did not want the plebiscite at all, but has now gripped onto the process as a means to an end. If a free vote was held on this issue in this parliament, marriage equality would not happen. The numbers are not there. I suspect he’s convinced himself now that this process is giving the reform its best shot. Given the Australian parliament is more conservative than the public, this is a case where politics has to work around its own institutional blockages to deliver a citizen-oriented outcome. Having a mandate directly from the people (assuming a yes vote) will help Turnbull get this done in terms of his own party.Turnbull did not want the plebiscite at all, but has now gripped onto the process as a means to an end. If a free vote was held on this issue in this parliament, marriage equality would not happen. The numbers are not there. I suspect he’s convinced himself now that this process is giving the reform its best shot. Given the Australian parliament is more conservative than the public, this is a case where politics has to work around its own institutional blockages to deliver a citizen-oriented outcome. Having a mandate directly from the people (assuming a yes vote) will help Turnbull get this done in terms of his own party.
That’s why he’s putting his fingers in his ears when Shorten asked him today about the potentially negative consequences associated with a big public debate on this question. He’s partly putting his fingers in his ears because he’s got no choice: he’s locked in on the people’s vote. It can’t change, so he has to make the best of it.That’s why he’s putting his fingers in his ears when Shorten asked him today about the potentially negative consequences associated with a big public debate on this question. He’s partly putting his fingers in his ears because he’s got no choice: he’s locked in on the people’s vote. It can’t change, so he has to make the best of it.
But he’s also partly doing what Malcolm Turnbull always does: backing himself in a leadership sense. He sees an opportunity where he can stride forth and deliver something of genuine moment. He’s clearly latched onto that idea of the plebiscite, a republican campaign 2.0 – but this time he wins, not loses.But he’s also partly doing what Malcolm Turnbull always does: backing himself in a leadership sense. He sees an opportunity where he can stride forth and deliver something of genuine moment. He’s clearly latched onto that idea of the plebiscite, a republican campaign 2.0 – but this time he wins, not loses.
It would be a tantalising fantasy, that, for Turnbull, a righting of the rout of 1999. Conservatives took him out on the republic – now he triumphs on same sex marriage. Cosmic justice. You can feel how enticing that would be.It would be a tantalising fantasy, that, for Turnbull, a righting of the rout of 1999. Conservatives took him out on the republic – now he triumphs on same sex marriage. Cosmic justice. You can feel how enticing that would be.
But he needs to be very careful. Shorten’s point about surround sound ugly is more than valid. I suspect we’ll see and hear a whole bunch of things that would be better left unsaid and unheard.But he needs to be very careful. Shorten’s point about surround sound ugly is more than valid. I suspect we’ll see and hear a whole bunch of things that would be better left unsaid and unheard.
We also have no idea about how this process will work, and at the end of the day, the mechanics are the difference between marriage equality happening and marriage equality not happening.We also have no idea about how this process will work, and at the end of the day, the mechanics are the difference between marriage equality happening and marriage equality not happening.
Turnbull’s still got to get an optimal process through his own ranks, and on that torturous mission, I can only wish him good luck.Turnbull’s still got to get an optimal process through his own ranks, and on that torturous mission, I can only wish him good luck.
UpdatedUpdated
at 6.07am BSTat 6.07am BST
5.09am BST5.09am BST
05:0905:09
Shorten comes back with a second go on marriage equality.Shorten comes back with a second go on marriage equality.
Q: Gay and lesbian health Victoria, in a submission to a Senate inquiry into a plebiscite on marriage equality has said putting the question of marriage equality to a plebiscite will allow extreme forms of homophobic abuse to be aired and treated as reasonable and just which will have a major impact on LGBT Australians’ wellbeing. Does the prime minister agree that this is a risk of his government’s policy?Q: Gay and lesbian health Victoria, in a submission to a Senate inquiry into a plebiscite on marriage equality has said putting the question of marriage equality to a plebiscite will allow extreme forms of homophobic abuse to be aired and treated as reasonable and just which will have a major impact on LGBT Australians’ wellbeing. Does the prime minister agree that this is a risk of his government’s policy?
Malcolm Turnbull:Malcolm Turnbull:
He (Shorten) thinks so little of the people of this country that he does not believe we are capable of having a civil debate on a matter of this importance. He is so frightened of public debate that he wants to shut the people out. I thought he would be saying don’t have a plebiscite, it costs a lot of money. That is a good point. It does cost a lot of money.He (Shorten) thinks so little of the people of this country that he does not believe we are capable of having a civil debate on a matter of this importance. He is so frightened of public debate that he wants to shut the people out. I thought he would be saying don’t have a plebiscite, it costs a lot of money. That is a good point. It does cost a lot of money.
But, no, his opposition to a plebiscite is because he does not want people to be able to express their views. He is worried that in a free debate, there may be some views expressed which he might find unpalatable. Let me tell you, I have great faith in the decency and the common sense in the humanity, in the wisdom of the Australian people and if there are unruly voices heard, they will be drowned out by the common sense and the respect and the general humanity of our people.But, no, his opposition to a plebiscite is because he does not want people to be able to express their views. He is worried that in a free debate, there may be some views expressed which he might find unpalatable. Let me tell you, I have great faith in the decency and the common sense in the humanity, in the wisdom of the Australian people and if there are unruly voices heard, they will be drowned out by the common sense and the respect and the general humanity of our people.
We are capable of great things in this country. We have done great things and one of the greatest things we do is we practice democracy and every day, we should be able to conduct public discourse, public discourse in a civil manner, in a respectful manner.We are capable of great things in this country. We have done great things and one of the greatest things we do is we practice democracy and every day, we should be able to conduct public discourse, public discourse in a civil manner, in a respectful manner.
I know, and the honourable member knows and everyone in this house knows and every Australian should know, that when the Australian people make their decision, that decision will stick.I know, and the honourable member knows and everyone in this house knows and every Australian should know, that when the Australian people make their decision, that decision will stick.
It will be decisive. It will be respected by this government and by this parliament and this nation.It will be decisive. It will be respected by this government and by this parliament and this nation.
5.02am BST5.02am BST
05:0205:02
Marriage equality now.Marriage equality now.
Q: Will the prime minister allow his members a free vote on the plebiscite legislation he will put to the parliament and will the vote occur before the next election?Q: Will the prime minister allow his members a free vote on the plebiscite legislation he will put to the parliament and will the vote occur before the next election?
Given the day’s events, Malcolm Turnbull provides in the first instance a very careful answer.Given the day’s events, Malcolm Turnbull provides in the first instance a very careful answer.
The government’s policy is that the question of whether same sex marriage will be legalised in Australia will be determined by a vote of all Australians by a plebiscite after the next election. The mechanics for that plebiscite will be the subject of careful consideration by cabinet and then consideration by the party room.The government’s policy is that the question of whether same sex marriage will be legalised in Australia will be determined by a vote of all Australians by a plebiscite after the next election. The mechanics for that plebiscite will be the subject of careful consideration by cabinet and then consideration by the party room.
We will deal with this in the traditional manner of a traditional cabinet government. I thank the honourable member for her interest and when the government has more to say on the mechanics, we will do so.We will deal with this in the traditional manner of a traditional cabinet government. I thank the honourable member for her interest and when the government has more to say on the mechanics, we will do so.
Having revved the engine, Turnbull then floors the accelerator. This message is directed over the dispatch box, but it is actually for internal consumption.Having revved the engine, Turnbull then floors the accelerator. This message is directed over the dispatch box, but it is actually for internal consumption.
The fact is that if the plebiscite vote is carried, same sex marriage will be legal in Australia. I understand that honourable members are under some misapprehension.The fact is that if the plebiscite vote is carried, same sex marriage will be legal in Australia. I understand that honourable members are under some misapprehension.
I do not know what paranoid echo chamber they are living in but let me tell you this - if you imagine that any government, this government or any government, would spend over $150m consulting every Australian on an issue of this kind and then ignore their decision, then they really are not living in the real world.I do not know what paranoid echo chamber they are living in but let me tell you this - if you imagine that any government, this government or any government, would spend over $150m consulting every Australian on an issue of this kind and then ignore their decision, then they really are not living in the real world.
We will give every single Australian a vote. You won’t. That is the difference. Under our approach, every Australian will have the vote.We will give every single Australian a vote. You won’t. That is the difference. Under our approach, every Australian will have the vote.
(Take that Eric.)(Take that Eric.)
4.55am BST4.55am BST
04:5504:55
A Thor question. Then a question to the minister for major projects, Paul Fletcher.A Thor question. Then a question to the minister for major projects, Paul Fletcher.
Q: Why has the government paid $56m to the NT CLP government to dig a hole in Palmerston, part fill it with concrete, hold a media event and then fill the hole again?Q: Why has the government paid $56m to the NT CLP government to dig a hole in Palmerston, part fill it with concrete, hold a media event and then fill the hole again?
My Darwin based colleague Helen Davidson wrote this story up recently. Take it away Helen. “The Northern Territory government has been accused of a publicity stunt, digging a hole for a concrete pour at the site of a new hospital, only to fill it in again once the TV cameras left.”My Darwin based colleague Helen Davidson wrote this story up recently. Take it away Helen. “The Northern Territory government has been accused of a publicity stunt, digging a hole for a concrete pour at the site of a new hospital, only to fill it in again once the TV cameras left.”
Paul Fletcher:Paul Fletcher:
Much has been made by those opposite of the fact that following a successful pour of the concrete for the central stair core, the slab was covered.Much has been made by those opposite of the fact that following a successful pour of the concrete for the central stair core, the slab was covered.
I am advised that the reason that this occurred was for occupational health and safety reasons.I am advised that the reason that this occurred was for occupational health and safety reasons.
A roar of hilarity drifts up from the opposition benches. Fletcher is not impressed.A roar of hilarity drifts up from the opposition benches. Fletcher is not impressed.
I am surprised that the party which supposedly represents the interests of the workers should be so cavalier about a question of occupational health and safety.I am surprised that the party which supposedly represents the interests of the workers should be so cavalier about a question of occupational health and safety.
You may regard it as a laughing matter. Let me assure you, the Turnbull government does not treat matters of work and safety as a laughing matter.You may regard it as a laughing matter. Let me assure you, the Turnbull government does not treat matters of work and safety as a laughing matter.
4.48am BST4.48am BST
04:4804:48
Labor’s Anna Burke.Labor’s Anna Burke.
Q: My question is to the minister for social services. Yesterday when asked about the Liberal government’s cuts to grandparent carers, the minister said “It is a very, very small cohort”. How many people does the minister have to hurt before the Liberal government pays attention?Q: My question is to the minister for social services. Yesterday when asked about the Liberal government’s cuts to grandparent carers, the minister said “It is a very, very small cohort”. How many people does the minister have to hurt before the Liberal government pays attention?
Porter says 3,700 people fall into a category of a grandparent carer.Porter says 3,700 people fall into a category of a grandparent carer.
What I put to the members opposite is they make what I think is a very strange assumption. It is not one that accords with the reality of the situation. The assumption is all grandparent carers are of aged pension age or older.What I put to the members opposite is they make what I think is a very strange assumption. It is not one that accords with the reality of the situation. The assumption is all grandparent carers are of aged pension age or older.
(Nope, nope, nope, is the feedback across the dispatch box.)(Nope, nope, nope, is the feedback across the dispatch box.)
Porter persists.Porter persists.
That 3,700 person cohort we are talking about are not all of aged pension age. A large number of them are people at 50 or well under 50. Surprise, surprise, on this side of the house, we say at 50 or under 50, there is a great importance in maintaining engagement with the work place.That 3,700 person cohort we are talking about are not all of aged pension age. A large number of them are people at 50 or well under 50. Surprise, surprise, on this side of the house, we say at 50 or under 50, there is a great importance in maintaining engagement with the work place.
That is good for you, it is good for your family, it is good for the nation.That is good for you, it is good for your family, it is good for the nation.
(There’s a fundamental comprehension gap here. Porter evidently think Labor’s argument is grandparents are too old to work. I think the opposition’s argument relates more to the circumstances of the carers, whether they have the capacity to work more if they are looking after children that are not their own.)(There’s a fundamental comprehension gap here. Porter evidently think Labor’s argument is grandparents are too old to work. I think the opposition’s argument relates more to the circumstances of the carers, whether they have the capacity to work more if they are looking after children that are not their own.)
4.40am BST4.40am BST
04:4004:40
I’m sure the prime minister’s head clutch is entirely coincidental.I’m sure the prime minister’s head clutch is entirely coincidental.
4.38am BST4.38am BST
04:3804:38
Shift change here for Labor. Tanya Plibersek is on to single parents.Shift change here for Labor. Tanya Plibersek is on to single parents.
Q: My question is to the minister for social services. Emma Marks is a single mum from the electorate of Flinders who works in retail and has a child in school. Emma writes in relation to the PM’s family tax benefit changes: “Please don’t away from the most vulnerable members of our society what little we have that helps us keep our heads above water”. Will the minister reconsider his cuts to family tax benefits for single parents like Emma?Q: My question is to the minister for social services. Emma Marks is a single mum from the electorate of Flinders who works in retail and has a child in school. Emma writes in relation to the PM’s family tax benefit changes: “Please don’t away from the most vulnerable members of our society what little we have that helps us keep our heads above water”. Will the minister reconsider his cuts to family tax benefits for single parents like Emma?
Porter says hang on, you are ignoring the package as a whole.Porter says hang on, you are ignoring the package as a whole.
That parent who works already will find her child care $30 better a week because she will receive $30 more a week under the childcare package that has been put together. That will be $1,500 ayear. That is a very significant increase in the welfare for that person.That parent who works already will find her child care $30 better a week because she will receive $30 more a week under the childcare package that has been put together. That will be $1,500 ayear. That is a very significant increase in the welfare for that person.
The individual parent can choose virtue of the child care package to engage in the work place or work more.The individual parent can choose virtue of the child care package to engage in the work place or work more.
What you assume is every person in that situation is perfectly passive and leaves their situation exactly as it is, leaves their situation exactly as it is, and makes no further effort with respect to work force engagement.What you assume is every person in that situation is perfectly passive and leaves their situation exactly as it is, leaves their situation exactly as it is, and makes no further effort with respect to work force engagement.
Plibersek, on a point of order.Plibersek, on a point of order.
The point of order is relevance. This is a real person in a real situation who is really working and really raising a daughter.The point of order is relevance. This is a real person in a real situation who is really working and really raising a daughter.
4.29am BST4.29am BST
04:2904:29
Macklin, persisting despite her lack of generational clarity.Macklin, persisting despite her lack of generational clarity.
Q: In an interview just now on Sky News, the minister for social services described the government’s new family cuts like this: “In the measures we have put before the parliament, there are snakes and there are ladders”. Who are the families who will suffer as a result of the snakes in your package?Q: In an interview just now on Sky News, the minister for social services described the government’s new family cuts like this: “In the measures we have put before the parliament, there are snakes and there are ladders”. Who are the families who will suffer as a result of the snakes in your package?
Porter persists too.Porter persists too.
We are reconfiguring an existing profile of spend in a way we think engenders workforce participation.We are reconfiguring an existing profile of spend in a way we think engenders workforce participation.
4.22am BST4.22am BST
04:2204:22
A technocrat in charge of social policy. It’s like a live social experiment.A technocrat in charge of social policy. It’s like a live social experiment.
4.20am BST4.20am BST
04:2004:20
Look at Malcolm, I tell you ..Look at Malcolm, I tell you ..
Another Dorothy Dixer on the China FTA. And Macklin is back with grandparents.Another Dorothy Dixer on the China FTA. And Macklin is back with grandparents.
Q: Yesterday, when the minister was queried about his cuts to family tax benefits that will hurt grandparent carers, the minister answered “The point being made here by Labor is a fair point”. The minister then confirmed grandparent carers will be $2,500 a year worse off. Does that mean the minister designed these cuts to family tax benefits in full knowledge that they would leave grandparent carers around $2,500 a year worse off?Q: Yesterday, when the minister was queried about his cuts to family tax benefits that will hurt grandparent carers, the minister answered “The point being made here by Labor is a fair point”. The minister then confirmed grandparent carers will be $2,500 a year worse off. Does that mean the minister designed these cuts to family tax benefits in full knowledge that they would leave grandparent carers around $2,500 a year worse off?
Christian Porter:Christian Porter:
The fundamental assumption that the member opposite makes is grandparents do not have a capacity to work or work more. We have a grandparent doing well in the chair to my right. We have grandparents on the opposite side of this house, engaging in the work force. As our population ages, the work place will be more and more full of grandparents.The fundamental assumption that the member opposite makes is grandparents do not have a capacity to work or work more. We have a grandparent doing well in the chair to my right. We have grandparents on the opposite side of this house, engaging in the work force. As our population ages, the work place will be more and more full of grandparents.
(Still in brave territory here, I reckon. Actually he just got braver.)(Still in brave territory here, I reckon. Actually he just got braver.)
The member opposite is from a generation that make assumptions about grandparents and about their capacity to work...The member opposite is from a generation that make assumptions about grandparents and about their capacity to work...
(Oh my.)(Oh my.)
4.13am BST4.13am BST
04:1304:13
A Dorothy Dixer on the China free trade agreement. Then Labor doubles back on family benefits, and directs a question to the social services minister Christian Porter.A Dorothy Dixer on the China free trade agreement. Then Labor doubles back on family benefits, and directs a question to the social services minister Christian Porter.
Labor’s Jenny Macklin points to an interview Porter did late yesterday, in which he stumbled over a couple of details of his package, suggesting at one point that grandparent carers might put 15 year old kids in childcare.Labor’s Jenny Macklin points to an interview Porter did late yesterday, in which he stumbled over a couple of details of his package, suggesting at one point that grandparent carers might put 15 year old kids in childcare.
Porter concedes the point. He was a bit confused yesterday, he says. But he’d like Labor to stick with the substance of the issues today.Porter concedes the point. He was a bit confused yesterday, he says. But he’d like Labor to stick with the substance of the issues today.
Christian Porter:Christian Porter:
We would acknowledge that a grandparent carer is probably the cohort where their ability to re-enter the work place is more limited than other cohorts.We would acknowledge that a grandparent carer is probably the cohort where their ability to re-enter the work place is more limited than other cohorts.
The assumption of members opposite is that any person who finds their FTB-B reducing is passive and simply is not going to make any decision.The assumption of members opposite is that any person who finds their FTB-B reducing is passive and simply is not going to make any decision.
Their assumption is that a grandparent carer can never re-enter the work place and that is a ridiculous, old fashioned notion which has no bearing to reality.Their assumption is that a grandparent carer can never re-enter the work place and that is a ridiculous, old fashioned notion which has no bearing to reality.
Both single parent carers and grandparent carers have the capacity.Both single parent carers and grandparent carers have the capacity.
4.07am BST4.07am BST
04:0704:07
Question timeQuestion time
Phew. It being 2pm ..Phew. It being 2pm ..
Labor opens on the families package.Labor opens on the families package.
Q: Last night in Senate estimates the prime minister’s cabinet secretary revealed that new cuts to family payments were linked to the government’s child care package “for political purposes”. Why is the prime minister cutting $2,500 from single parent families earning $60,000?Q: Last night in Senate estimates the prime minister’s cabinet secretary revealed that new cuts to family payments were linked to the government’s child care package “for political purposes”. Why is the prime minister cutting $2,500 from single parent families earning $60,000?
Malcolm Turnbull appears better briefed than he was yesterday.Malcolm Turnbull appears better briefed than he was yesterday.
The opposition leader seems determined to run a scare campaign on stand alone measures. On this side of the House, we are focused on implementing an entire package of reforms that will ensure the way we are delivering support for families is sustainable and better targeted.The opposition leader seems determined to run a scare campaign on stand alone measures. On this side of the House, we are focused on implementing an entire package of reforms that will ensure the way we are delivering support for families is sustainable and better targeted.
The revised package, introduced by the minister for social services, must be considered in the context of a range of Australian government family payments. Grandparent carers are eligible for a number ofAustralian government family payments, such as family tax benefit, parenting payment and child care benefit if they meet the eligibility requirements.The revised package, introduced by the minister for social services, must be considered in the context of a range of Australian government family payments. Grandparent carers are eligible for a number ofAustralian government family payments, such as family tax benefit, parenting payment and child care benefit if they meet the eligibility requirements.
For the grandparents on an income support payment, grandparent child care benefit helps with the cost of raising children. Under this benefit, grandparents currently receive up to 100 hours a fortnight of free child care.For the grandparents on an income support payment, grandparent child care benefit helps with the cost of raising children. Under this benefit, grandparents currently receive up to 100 hours a fortnight of free child care.
In addition, if the child meets the criteria of an orphan, the grandparent carer may be eligible for a double orphan pension. They could also obtain a non-income tested foster child health care card for the children in their care.In addition, if the child meets the criteria of an orphan, the grandparent carer may be eligible for a double orphan pension. They could also obtain a non-income tested foster child health care card for the children in their care.
We recognise that single parent families and families where a grandparent is the carer have particular challenges when it comes to child care. That is why we will continue to provide a supplementary payment of $1,000 a year to those families while a child is aged between 13 and 16.We recognise that single parent families and families where a grandparent is the carer have particular challenges when it comes to child care. That is why we will continue to provide a supplementary payment of $1,000 a year to those families while a child is aged between 13 and 16.
In addition, all eligible families with the youngest child under one will receive an extra $1,000 a year.In addition, all eligible families with the youngest child under one will receive an extra $1,000 a year.
(Possibly safer this, as a description, than snakes and ladders).(Possibly safer this, as a description, than snakes and ladders).
4.00am BST4.00am BST
04:0004:00
And from the enduring legend that is Mike Bowers: is this man an alien?And from the enduring legend that is Mike Bowers: is this man an alien?
Director Ridley Scott beams in during the press conference confirming the next Thor and the Alien movie will be shot here.Director Ridley Scott beams in during the press conference confirming the next Thor and the Alien movie will be shot here.
Thanks for the millions Australia.Thanks for the millions Australia.
3.57am BST3.57am BST
03:5703:57
No time for a lunchtime summary, terribly sorry.No time for a lunchtime summary, terribly sorry.
I’m greatly indebted to Daniel Hurst and Shalailah Medhora for their transcribing help during those very brisk transitions in the past thirty minutes or so.I’m greatly indebted to Daniel Hurst and Shalailah Medhora for their transcribing help during those very brisk transitions in the past thirty minutes or so.
Legends.Legends.
Question time, it cometh.Question time, it cometh.
3.54am BST3.54am BST
03:5403:54
If we were ..If we were ..
Now, that Bishop quote on Australia stepping into the breach potentially in Iraq and Syria.Now, that Bishop quote on Australia stepping into the breach potentially in Iraq and Syria.
Q: What is Australia’s response to Canada’s decision to withdraw from airstrikes? Will Australia have to pick up the slack by the increasing the number of airstrikes?Q: What is Australia’s response to Canada’s decision to withdraw from airstrikes? Will Australia have to pick up the slack by the increasing the number of airstrikes?
Julie Bishop:Julie Bishop:
We understand that the new Canadian government intends to maintain a level of support similar to ours, other than in relation to airstrikes, and that’s of course a decision for the new government. We’ve not been asked to do any more in that regard. If we were, we would consider it and put it in the context of our capacity, capability and national interest.We understand that the new Canadian government intends to maintain a level of support similar to ours, other than in relation to airstrikes, and that’s of course a decision for the new government. We’ve not been asked to do any more in that regard. If we were, we would consider it and put it in the context of our capacity, capability and national interest.
3.51am BST3.51am BST
03:5103:51
Modern day McCarthyism and Snakes and LaddersModern day McCarthyism and Snakes and Ladders
Two things very quickly.Two things very quickly.
Labor is going nuts (that’s a technical term) about the developments Daniel Hurst has covered on the blog in TURC today – the commission’s request for Labor to produce membership records.Labor is going nuts (that’s a technical term) about the developments Daniel Hurst has covered on the blog in TURC today – the commission’s request for Labor to produce membership records.
Shadow employment minister Brendan O’Connor:Shadow employment minister Brendan O’Connor:
This is an unprecedented day in our democracy. It is modern day McCarthyism.This is an unprecedented day in our democracy. It is modern day McCarthyism.
O’Connor said that the notice to produce would mean handing over the personal details, including home address, credit card numbers and birth dates, of 9,000 branch members.O’Connor said that the notice to produce would mean handing over the personal details, including home address, credit card numbers and birth dates, of 9,000 branch members.
Malcolm Turnbull is all talk when it comes to liberty, because under his name, he is allowing for this commission to use state powers to invade so intrusively in the lives of ordinary citizens.Malcolm Turnbull is all talk when it comes to liberty, because under his name, he is allowing for this commission to use state powers to invade so intrusively in the lives of ordinary citizens.
Shadow attorney-general Mark Dreyfus:Shadow attorney-general Mark Dreyfus:
There is a right to freedom of association in this country, a right to belong to political parties without fear of any political or governmental intrusion, and this has well and truly crossed the line.There is a right to freedom of association in this country, a right to belong to political parties without fear of any political or governmental intrusion, and this has well and truly crossed the line.
New social services minister Christian Porter is pushing the bounds of brave (in the Appleby sense) in selling the family benefits package. He’s just told Sky News the package is comprised of snakes and ladders.New social services minister Christian Porter is pushing the bounds of brave (in the Appleby sense) in selling the family benefits package. He’s just told Sky News the package is comprised of snakes and ladders.
There are both snakes and ladders, but the ladders are the most important thing.There are both snakes and ladders, but the ladders are the most important thing.
Errr...Errr...
UpdatedUpdated
at 3.55am BSTat 3.55am BST
3.46am BST3.46am BST
03:4603:46
Will Australia step into the breach?Will Australia step into the breach?
Bishop in that press conference was also asked about the impact of the new Canadian government’s decision to withdraw substantially from Middle East combat operations. The foreign minister left open the notion that Australia might step into the breach. I’ll post the quote in a minute. There are just a few things I need to get through before question time!Bishop in that press conference was also asked about the impact of the new Canadian government’s decision to withdraw substantially from Middle East combat operations. The foreign minister left open the notion that Australia might step into the breach. I’ll post the quote in a minute. There are just a few things I need to get through before question time!
UpdatedUpdated
at 4.02am BSTat 4.02am BST
3.41am BST3.41am BST
03:4103:41
Love this little sequence from Mr Bowers.Love this little sequence from Mr Bowers.
3.36am BST3.36am BST
03:3603:36
The press conference has moved to general questions now. Bishop is asked, as deputy leader of the Liberal party, whether she’d support the Entsch proposal on the plebiscite mechanics.The press conference has moved to general questions now. Bishop is asked, as deputy leader of the Liberal party, whether she’d support the Entsch proposal on the plebiscite mechanics.
Julie Bishop:Julie Bishop:
As deputy leader of the Liberal party I wouldn’t pre-empt any cabinet discussion on this topic.As deputy leader of the Liberal party I wouldn’t pre-empt any cabinet discussion on this topic.
Bishop is also asked to explain her choice of red-faced cranky-man emoji to characterise the Russian president Vladimir Putin – following on from this morning’s estimates hearing. The foreign minister says she doesn’t use twitter for serious foreign policy. She uses it for short, pithy statements. She’s surprised Labor senators can’t grasp that context. On the emoji choice, Bishop says Putin self describes as a hard man. She says having met president Putin, she is quite certain he would be delighted with the choice of emoji.Bishop is also asked to explain her choice of red-faced cranky-man emoji to characterise the Russian president Vladimir Putin – following on from this morning’s estimates hearing. The foreign minister says she doesn’t use twitter for serious foreign policy. She uses it for short, pithy statements. She’s surprised Labor senators can’t grasp that context. On the emoji choice, Bishop says Putin self describes as a hard man. She says having met president Putin, she is quite certain he would be delighted with the choice of emoji.
3.24am BST3.24am BST
03:2403:24
Fifield says gov will contribute $47m to get films here but will mean $300m in investment in Aus & 3000 jobs for Australians #auspolFifield says gov will contribute $47m to get films here but will mean $300m in investment in Aus & 3000 jobs for Australians #auspol
3.19am BST3.19am BST
03:1903:19
Jetlag. We feel you Disney lady.Jetlag. We feel you Disney lady.
3.18am BST3.18am BST
03:1803:18
Fifield throws to a Disney executive Mary-Anne Hughes, who unfortunately can’t quite remember his name.Fifield throws to a Disney executive Mary-Anne Hughes, who unfortunately can’t quite remember his name.
On behalf of the Walt Disney Company and Marvel Studios, we would like to thank the Australian federal government, in particular we would like to thank foreign minister Julie Bishop, and minister for the arts ... (pause) ... Fifield ...On behalf of the Walt Disney Company and Marvel Studios, we would like to thank the Australian federal government, in particular we would like to thank foreign minister Julie Bishop, and minister for the arts ... (pause) ... Fifield ...
I’m sorry, Mitch Fifield.I’m sorry, Mitch Fifield.
I apologise!I apologise!
3.15am BST
03:15
Arts minister Mitch Fifield, outing the prime minister as a sci-fi and fantasy buff.
The prime minister has taken a minute-by-minute interest in this venture. He was determined to see that this would be landed.
3.13am BST
03:13
It’s always a balance with these sorts of developments – the Australian film industry wants to be plugged in to the global industry, it means local people can stay in the country while working in their profession of choice rather than having to work elsewhere – but when big Hollywood productions shoot here, there is also periodic hand wringing about whether local productions and Australian stories get crowded out.
This debate has been going on for decades.
3.10am BST
03:10
Julie Bishop:
The Australian government believes our prosperity and economic growth as a nation depends on much on seizing new opportunities and as prime minister Turnbull has stated the government must be flexible, we must be responsive to opportunities that provide investment into Australia and promote economic growth, jobs and further innovation.
During recent visits to both Los Angeles and New York, I met with senior executives of major film and production houses, with Walt Disney Company, Marvel, 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers, Village Roadshow, NBC Universal and directors Ridley Scott and Brett Ratner, who all expressed a very keen desire to invest in significant film production projects right here in Australia, and they specifically spoke about the value in Australia as a filming destination, the quality and variety of our locations, but more importantly our highly qualified and talented workforce, our embrace of innovative technology, our stable economy, our dollar – all this makes Australia an attractive destination.
Many Australians are employed directly by Australia’s creative industries, and attracting major films made here will be a significant boost for our economy, for our industrial base, and for linking Australia in innumerable ways to our ever-globalising world.
Updated
at 3.37am BST
3.07am BST
03:07
Thor and Ridley Scott Downunder
The foreign minister Julie Bishop has announced the government has secured the local production of two big Hollywood productions: the next Thor movie from Marvel, and the next Ridley Scott picture.
She looks quite pleased. Take cover Penny Wong. I suspect another outbreak of emoji diplomacy.
Updated
at 3.07am BST
2.49am BST
02:49
Daniel Hurst
Back to TURC. I have some more details about the notice to produce documents that was the subject of legal wrangling at the trade union royal commission a short time ago. It was addressed to the Australian Labor Party’s Victorian branch and was dated yesterday, with a deadline of midday today.
The commission sought “All membership forms, including any payment details, for all people who became members or renewed their memberships of the Victorian branch of the Australian Labor Party during the Period … 1 April 2013 to 31 May 2013”. As per the standard form of such notices, it warned that contravention of the request - except in circumstances permitted by the Royal Commission Act - is punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment for up to six months.
Here’s the relevant exchange that occurred in the royal commission hearing today:
Counsel assisting the inquiry, Jeremy Stoljar SC:
I’m told by the legal representatives for the recipient of the notice that it required the production of a very large number of documents. If that’s the case and it could be oppressive to the recipient of the notice that notice is not pressed and is withdrawn and consideration will be given to issuing a notice in narrower form, perhaps after some discussions with the legal representatives of the recipient of the notice.
Noel Hutley SC, representing the Victorian Labor party:
We object to the form of the notice as being beyond the terms of the commission’s inquiry and also observing that if pursued it would require the production of many thousands of documents. just to make that clear. It’s not just on the basis of oppression. The form of the document went beyond, in our respectful submission, the terms of this inquiry.
Dyson Heydon, the commissioner:
That’s been noted.
2.40am BST
02:40
I mentioned earlier on today that Greens senator Rachel Siewart was trying in community affairs estimates to get to the bottom of technical analysis by officials about the impact of the government’s new family benefits changes. It was heavy going. She’s sent me this brief statement.
Rachel Siewart
136,000 single parents caring for teenagers will have their FTB B payment cut as a result of the government’s cuts to family benefits. These cuts will make life remarkably harder for families struggling to get by. It beggars belief that the government is so insistent on finding budget savings amongst our most vulnerable. The department was painfully opaque about my requests to get analysis of the measure that separates the FTB B cuts from the childcare package. It is imperative that we learn the impact of the proposed changes on single parents for both those who will not get the benefit of proposed childcare spending and those who will. The two components must be separated because not everyone will be putting their children in childcare. Anyone with kids aged 13 to 16 knows it can be some of the most expensive years as a parent. It’s when growing teens are raiding the fridge, growing, becoming more invested in hobbies and school supplies can get costly. Single parents and their families should not be subject to more cuts, they’re who we should be supporting.
2.35am BST
02:35
Chafta legislation clears the lower house
The House is voting on the Chafta legislation now. The Greens amendments have been defeated. Here comes the final vote. There she blows.
The legislation has passed the lower house.
Updated
at 2.46am BST
2.31am BST
02:31
Shalailah Medhora
Back to indigenous health. Even more peace in our time...
Fiona Nash has managed to achieve something few in this place can - not only has she received tri-partisan support for her implementation plan for closing the gap with Indigenous health, she’s managed to get the backing of Indigenous health experts, too.
The new plan, launched in Parliament House on Thursday, sees the addition of 20 new health goals in order to close the gap by 2031.
Nash, the rural health minister who has responsibility for Indigenous health, admits that it is a big ask, particularly since progress on many of the existing health target has stalled or gone backwards in the last few years. She told reporters that better health outcomes can be achieved when “all parties work together”.
Nash also pointed to the fact that Indigenous-specific mental health initiatives will feature in the government’s response to the mental health commission’s report on how to shake up the system, expected by the end of the year.
Updated
at 2.46am BST
2.29am BST
02:29
Daniel Hurst
Quick update from the trade union royal commission. TURC has withdrawn an order to the Victorian branch of the Labor party for thousands of membership documents, amid objections about whether the request fell within the inquiry’s terms of reference.
It is understood the notice to produce was issued to the state Labor branch yesterday afternoon, with a deadline of midday today. Sources said the commission sought membership and renewal forms for the period 1 April 2013 to 31 May 2013, covering the time of the year when annual renewals normally take place.
Noel Hutley SC, representing the Victorian Labor party, attended a commission hearing in Sydney on Thursday to object to the notice. When the proceedings resumed at midday, the counsel assisting the inquiry, Jeremy Stoljar SC, said he had been told that the notice to produce involved a “very large number of documents”.
Stoljar indicated the commission would withdraw the notice and consider issuing one in a narrower form. Hutley said the notice would have yielded “many thousands of documents” and questioned whether it was beyond the terms of reference for the royal commission.
After the brief interruption, the commission continued questioning Cesar Melhem, who was the Australian Workers’ Union Victorian state secretary from 2006 to 2013.
2.23am BST
02:23
Andrew Robb, still thundering at Bandt. Weasel words. Fabricated concerns.
You have not bothered once to come and seek some clarity on this. If we are going to have reasoned debate, we need to be as informed as possible.
2.20am BST
02:20
You should be ashamed of yourself, member for Melbourne! We need to grow up in this chamber.
The trade minister Andrew Robb is currently shouting at Adam Bandt in the House. Bandt is trying to move amendments to the legislation giving effect to the China free trade agreement. Bandt says hang on, you gave Labor some concessions, why not consider some others?
Adam Bandt:
We don’t like coming here as a parliament and being told, take it or leave it.
(This legislation will pass the chamber very shortly.)
2.14am BST
02:14
There’s been an indigenous health event downstairs. My colleague Shalailah Medhora will contribute a post in a little bit. Meanwhile, a lovely picture from Mr Bowers.
2.03am BST
02:03
Eric Abetz: no labels, fair labels
I didn’t get a chance in the early morning flurry to capture the backend of Eric Abetz’s outing on the AM program. I linked earlier in the week to an interview the former government senator leader did with the Australian’s media editor Sharri Markson about the parliamentary press gallery’s terrible bias against conservatives and Christians. Abetz was invited this morning to revisit his thesis and being a generous sort, well ...
Q: On that issue, more broadly on that issue, you took a swipe at the media for unfairly treating conservative Christian politicians earlier this week. Do you really think Christian values don’t get a fair hearing?
Eric Abetz
What I said was that there was a negative sentiment over right-conservative politicians and a subset of that was the treatment of Christian conservative politicians. And yes, I do. How often for example have I had to put up with the tag of “religious right” or “far right”, whereas [you] hardly ever hear it of the “religious left” or the “irreligious left” or the “far left” or the “extreme left” when talking about the Australian Greens or vast elements of the Australian Labor party? And it’s this sort of subtle stereotyping and slapping labels on people that a number of my colleagues have got a bit sick and tired of and as a result I gave expression to it. And if I might say, Michael, the public reaction has been overwhelming, people saying …
Q: Religious right, though – it’s not an inaccurate description though, is it?
Well the term – well, if you are into labels Michael, and this is where all I’m seeking is fair treatment. If you say “religious right”, why don’t you say “irreligious left” or “Godless left”? That is what I’m talking about. If you want accurate descriptors where religion all of a sudden becomes so important, fine, but then call out atheists for what they are – atheists. And that never happens, does it Michael? And that is what I am concerned about. And, can I tell you, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of our fellow Australians are concerned about that unfair treatment as well, keeping in mind that more people go to church of a weekend than go to the football.
Updated
at 2.12am BST
1.42am BST
01:42
Readers with me yesterday will know that the former treasurer, Joe Hockey, bowed out of politics. The farewell address was a somewhat patchy affair – mainly self-justification, with a dash of delusion and a splash of geniality and generosity, overlaid by the thick sentiment always present at such occasions.
My colleague Greg Jericho isn’t shedding any tears at the Hockey departure. Grogs fans will get a few laugh out louds at his latest blog bidding the former treasurer farewell. He’s really quite cranky. If you want the whole piece you can find that here.
In the meantime, here’s the conclusion.
That was Hockey as treasurer: all talk that never held up to scrutiny, policy put forward for either baseless ideological purposes or because it might wedge the ALP or target people who were deemed not to be Liberal party voters. And the ever-present demand for brownie points for taking a “tough” stance. The problem for Hockey as treasurer wasn’t that the policy was good and the politics poor, but that the policy was all about politics – and combined, both were dreadful.
Updated
at 2.13am BST
1.12am BST
01:12
In community affairs estimates, officials are being asked about whether they have produced cameo work on the new version of the family benefits package the government has produced this week.
Green senator Rachel Siewert is after analysis which shows the impact of the proposed changes on single parents who will not get the benefit of the proposed spending on childcare. She wants the two components disaggregated because she points out that not everyone will be putting their children in childcare.
Social services officials say there’s an increase in benefits, regardless of the childcare package.
Rachel Siewert
The $10?
(She sounds unimpressed).
Updated
at 1.36am BST
12.55am BST
00:55
Labor’s policy on the sharing economy is actually six principles. It’s a signpost to doing something rather than a set of concrete actions.
The principles, are, as follows.
Primary property is yours to share
New services must support good wages and working conditions
Everyone pays their fair share of tax
Proper protection for public safety
Access for all
Playing by the rules
Rule for Thursday. Don’t stand so close to the edge of today that you fall off. That advice has nothing to do with the six principles. It’s just something I threw in for free.
12.40am BST
00:40
I’ll give you the principles of the sharing economy policy once we are through this press conference.
Shorten is facing questions about marriage equality. Does he support the Entsch proposal which has enraged Eric Abetz?
The Labor leader says he’ll talk to Malcolm Turnbull about the mechanics of the plebiscite. He makes a broader point, which he’s made before, but probably bears repeating in the context of today’s renewed brawling.
Do we really want to subject members of the LGBTI community to a no case? Do you really want to see government funded campaigns attacking the moral basis of same-sex marriage and of your choices about your sexuality?
My concern about a plebiscite isn’t just the top-line issue, is it a good or bad idea to give people a say?
Everyone agrees it’s always a good idea to give people a say, but can you imagine the no case?
I don’t want young people in regional Australia, who might already feel pressured and stigmatised too, have to subject to a TV campaign where they’re told that their sexuality and their choices are somehow not fit to be allowed to be married – so we have reservations about a divisive debate which will cause a lot of harm, especially when we already have a thing called the parliament and we make choices every day in parliament.
Q: Labor MPs have a conscience vote on the issue now, will Labor MPs have a conscience vote or be bound if legislation goes to this parliament to legalise same-sex marriage if it’s ratified by a plebiscite after the next election?
We will need to see the proposals from Malcolm Turnbull.
12.30am BST
00:30
We interrupt the sharing economy for just one minute, and track back to emojis, because we couldn’t resist.
#estimates @SenatorWong questions George on @JulieBishopMP use of emojis @murpharoo @GuardianAus #politicslive pic.twitter.com/QH23rl0Y4A
12.28am BST
00:28
The opposite being also true ..
Q: One problem with the sharing economy is whether or not the likes of Uber would pay their fair share of tax. Would a future Labor government force Uber to pay their fair share of tax?
Bill Shorten:
We think everyone should pay their fair share of tax. We understand when you have new technology, some of the old regulations don’t automatically catch the developments of new technology.
I do not think it is an insurmountable problem to ensure that Uber pays their fair share of taxation. What I’m not going to do with the new economy is drown it in red tape. We’ll get the balance right.
I really understand for the taxi industry, a lot of people have invested money in the plates and the leases but we also want to make sure that we, on one hand, protect that business investment, but on the other hand we don’t hold back ride sharing or progress.
12.24am BST
00:24
'Labor knows that the sharing economy offers exciting potentials at the edge of today ... '
As diverting as emojis may be, I need to press on with the sharing economy.
Labor leader Bill Shorten is holding a press conference now to take questions about today’s announcement.
Labor’s sharing economy principles can be summarised as light-touch regulation. Our priority and the principles which Andrew will take you through has been to get the balance right between the rights and conditions of people at work, making sure people pay their taxation, making sure that public safety remains foremost, understanding the primary property is yours to use and making sure, of course, that people pay their fair share of taxes.
Once we establish these principles, and sit down and talk with states and territories about regulation, at that point we want to make sure the rules apply to everyone.
We have zero tolerance after that for people not paying their taxes, not adhering to the regulations.
But Labor knows that the sharing economy offers exciting potentials at the edge of today so that we can do better in the future. We also understand we have to get the balance right between the conditions of people, consumers and the public good.
(Yes, he really did say exciting potentials at the edge of today).
Updated
at 12.29am BST
12.10am BST
00:10
This is called squaring circles.
Don't need 😎 when @JulieBishopMP is throwing this much shade https://t.co/27VIrgbxSn
12.07am BST
00:07
In politics this is called rapid response.
Happy to provide @SenatorWong 😳 with a translation of emoji to a language Labor understands 😎
12.05am BST
00:05
Wong produces a BuzzFeed interview. In February, BuzzFeed conducted “the world’s first political emoji interview” with the foreign minister Julie Bishop. Wong is seeking clarification about a reflection on the Russian president, Vladimir Putin – Bishop chose an emoji with a red and angry face to depict her view on the president.
Q: Do you think that was a helpful public statement? I’d like to understand what the diplomatic message is? Is it intended to express the fact the foreign minister is angry with president Putin?
Peter Varghese:
You’ve only just drawn my attention to this.
George Brandis:
It could be a reference to ideology, senator.
Brandis means the redness, presumably.
Wong thinks evidently that emojis shouldn’t be used to express Australia’s foreign policy propositions. What is the public message here?
Brandis, losing his humour slightly.
It wasn’t a demarche, an official statement.
Chris Back:
I’ve never heard of what a BuzzFeed was until my staff just told me.
Updated
at 12.30am BST
11.53pm BST
23:53
Emoji gate
Estimates hearings are continuing, I haven’t quite got to Labor and the sharing economy yet but I will shortly, and the debate over the government’s proposed changes to the family benefits scheme is continuing. I suspect we’ll hear more about that over the course of today.
Estimates, in the foreign affairs committee. Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong.
Q: Does DFAT ever use emojis to communicate in diplomatic negotiations?
DFAT secretary Peter Varghese isn’t sure.
Liberal senator Chris Back.
There’s a bit of confusion about what this term means.
George Brandis can assist with that.
It’s the smiley faces and so forth, he notes.
A junior DFAT official says he’s not aware of emojis being used.
Wong:
An emoji-free zone?
Liberal senator Michael Ronaldson says emojis do save time when texting, and space.
Wong:
That’s because you are a binary kind of guy.
(You all know the foreign minister, Julie Bishop, likes emojis, don’t you?)
Updated
at 12.31am BST
11.31pm BST
23:31
Who says politics is a dog-eat-dog business?
Jamie first sat, then stood, then ran, then was stretchered off.
Updated
at 11.49pm BST
11.27pm BST
23:27
Eric Abetz has moved from the ABC to Sky News. Given he just told the ABC a plebiscite should be followed by a conscience vote, host Kieran Gilbert wants to know if he’ll accept the outcome of the plebiscite if the people vote yes.
Abetz isn’t entirely definitive on that point. He compares plebiscites to election results. When people voted for Kevin Rudd in 2007, he accepted that. When Julia Gillard formed a minority government in 2010 he accepted that.
Eric Abetz:
If the plebiscite is clear and the questions are clear then the Australian people will have had their say.
It sounds positive but it’s still ambiguous.
Eric Abetz:
The parliament will need to take into account the view of the plebiscite, there’s no doubt about that.
(See what I mean?)
Updated
at 11.50pm BST
11.10pm BST
23:10
Sitting, standing, running
Back, briefly, to Jamie Briggs, who first sat, then stood, then ran – but in no universe broke a piece of commonwealth property on the night Tony Abbott lost the prime ministership.
We thought we’d recreate the scene.
Another working theory on the running – Briggs breaks away after first packing down with rugby tragics Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey.
Samantha Maiden, the Sunday correspondent for News Corp, can be seen in the background, taking notes.
Updated
at 11.20pm BST
11.04pm BST
23:04
Shalailah Medhora
“What’s the point of holding a plebiscite if then after that plebiscite Malcolm Turnbull gives Coalition members a conscience vote?” the shadow assistant education minister, Amanda Rishworth, has just told Sky News. “The question of whether or not there will be a conscience vote after the plebiscite has still not been resolved,” she said. “He couldn’t answer that question in question time.”
Updated
at 11.21pm BST
10.42pm BST
22:42
Not happy Eric
To marriage equality now in more depth.
Let’s step through this carefully.
Yesterday in the House, the prime minister was asked a question on the plebiscite that will be held after the next federal election.
Let’s recap that.
Q: My question is to the prime minister. I refer to the prime minister’s support for a plebiscite on marriage equality. Will the national result of the plebiscite be binding on Coalition members or will individual Coalition members be bound by the results in their individual seats or will the vote not be binding on Coalition members at all?
Malcolm Turnbull:
That is a very good question and I thank you for it. Well, I think it’s fair – I think it’s an absolutely reasonable request and the answer is that the consequence of a yes vote in the plebiscite will be that same-sex marriage will be legal in Australia.
As I pointed out yesterday, this answer from Turnbull is a complete fudge. He was asked about the mechanics of the plebiscite and the aftermath and he failed to engage on the substance – because engaging on the substance is like a red rag to a conservative bull (as it were).
But the definitive Turnbull statement of principle – a yes vote in the plebiscite equals a yes vote in the parliament – was evidently enough to raise the blood pressure in certain quarters of the government. Why? Because marriage equality opponents in the government don’t see the “people’s vote” as a means of securing marriage equality, they see it as a means of delaying any change, and better still, killing it entirely.
Separately to Turnbull’s comments yesterday, Warren Entsch is trying to persuade Turnbull to agree to legislation in this parliament for the plebiscite that would trigger a change in the Marriage Act if the people ultimately vote yes some time after the next election. Rolling out change (or not) in this way gets around the constitutional difficulties associated with binding future parliaments.
This is mission creep of course, and party conservatives weren’t born yesterday.
So this morning, conservatives are rallying, huffing and puffing.
Tasmanian Liberal senator Eric Abetz has just told the ABC this is a “thought bubble and an ambush to boot”. Abetz says the position of the Coalition party room is clear: there will be no change to the party’s position on marriage in this term of government. A plebiscite will be held after the next election and the parliament will respond with a free vote. Abetz says of the renewed push, these are not actions that will help party unity. He’s noted that his colleague Warren Entsch “spends an inordinate amount of time on this issue and good luck to him”.
Abetz has been joined by LNP senator Matt Canavan and ACT senator Zed Seselja. Both Canavan and Seselja say the present parliament should not pass legislation binding a future parliament. But unlike Abetz, his Senate colleagues are both signalling they’ll ultimately accept what the voters decide. In principle at least.
Updated
at 11.40pm BST
10.11pm BST
22:11
Hello hello
Good morning everyone and welcome to Thursday in Canberra. Marriage equality is back on the agenda, courtesy of the prime minster saying both nothing and too much (from the point of view of conservatives) in an answer to a question during question time yesterday. Something is stirring in the morning. Thought bubbles and ambushes at 20 paces. More of that very shortly.
It has been a big week for policy, which is a most welcome development. We’ve had the government’s response to the Murray review, we’ve had a revamped effort on family benefits, the major parties have come to a handshake on the China free-trade deal, and today, Labor will join the fray with a policy on the sharing economy. I’ll bring you some key points on that shortly.
But given the close reader interest this week in the fate of a marble table smashed in the cabinet anteroom during a farewell for Tony Abbott on the night he lost the top job – I can’t resist opening with this precious exchange.
Jamie Briggs, who appeared in a wheelchair the morning after the Abbott farewell hijinks, has been the fall guy for the busted furniture, particularly as he, initially, attempted to fudge the reasons why he was in the wheelchair.
Yesterday he faced the following grilling on Adelaide radio. I’ll let this transcript speak for itself, but look for the following keywords: party, event, sitting, standing, running.
Q: Jamie Briggs you were there at the party, who broke the table?
Jamie Briggs:
I wasn’t there when that happened. I’d gone by then.
Q: Have you asked Joe Hockey who broke it?
If Joe Hockey wants to talk about the party after I left, then he will do so. Towards the end of the night when whatever happened to the table happened – I can’t comment.
Q: You’ve been unfairly maligned?
I have a little. What can I say Matt?
Q: It was a party?
It wasn’t a party. A guy who loses the prime ministership ... it was really more sitting around having a chat and a discussion. As the night got a little later, I guess we were more standing up.
But some of the reports about dancing on tables and so on are just wrong. How the table broke, I actually don’t know I wasn’t there. I don’t have a piece of the table in my office. I had at that point limped back to my office if I can put it that way.
Q: But hang on, you hurt your foot the next day didn’t you?
No, I said I’d hurt my knee running, which is true.
Q: What, that evening?
That’s right.
Q: Before you went to the party?
During some events if I can put it that way.
Q: Before you went to the party?
No, during the event.
It wasn’t a party.
Q: During the event in the prime minister’s office?
Ahhhh, well it wasn’t in the prime minister’s office. It’s now become folklore so we’ll let it stay as folklore.
(Pause)
Mark Butler is sitting next me, why don’t you ask him some questions?
Mark Butler:
I think you are doing very well.
I hope you laughed as much as I did. Perhaps we could float one speculative, “running-at-the-event” scenario. (Hey Jamie, get the beer mate! Oh, OK then ... Crunch.)
Seriousness is bearing down on all of us so let’s get chatting. The thread is open for your business and Mikeraoo and I are up and at it on the twits. He’s @mpbowers I’m @murpharoo
Don’t run with scissors children. Here comes Thursday.
Updated
at 10.56pm BST