This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/22/snp-attacks-english-votes-for-english-laws-plan-before-commons-debate

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
SNP attacks English votes for English laws plan before Commons debate SNP attacks English votes for English laws plan before Commons debate
(35 minutes later)
MPs are to debate controversial rules that would give English MPs the right of veto over English laws, infuriating the SNP and drawing criticism from parliament’s procedure watchdog.MPs are to debate controversial rules that would give English MPs the right of veto over English laws, infuriating the SNP and drawing criticism from parliament’s procedure watchdog.
Chris Grayling, the leader of the Commons, hailed the new rules, known as English votes for English laws (Evel), as a way of giving the English more control over their country’s destiny.Chris Grayling, the leader of the Commons, hailed the new rules, known as English votes for English laws (Evel), as a way of giving the English more control over their country’s destiny.
He insisted the plans, which will be debated by MPs on Thursday, would actually “strengthen the union” as people in England would feel there was a greater balance following the devolution settlements with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. He said the plans, to be debated by MPs on Thursday, would strengthen the union as people in England would feel there was a greater balance following the devolution settlements with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
But the SNP said the plans were a “dog’s breakfast”, which would cause divisions between English and Scottish MPs. “They will make Scottish MPs second class in the unitary UK parliament, they will politicise the office of Speaker in forcing him to take the decision to exclude Scottish MPs from bills and they create an unnecessary new level of parliamentary procedure in a very tight parliamentary timetable,” Pete Wishart, shadow SNP leader of the Commons, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. But the SNP said the plans were a “dog’s breakfast” that would cause divisions between English and Scottish MPs. “They will make Scottish MPs second class in the unitary UK parliament, they will politicise the office of Speaker in forcing him to take the decision to exclude Scottish MPs from bills and they create an unnecessary new level of parliamentary procedure in a very tight parliamentary timetable,” Pete Wishart, the SNP’s shadow leader of the Commons, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
The Commons procedure committee, chaired by Conservative MP Charles Walker, has also branded the proposals “over-engineered and potentially burdensome”. At the heart of objections is the plan to let John Bercow, the Commons Speaker, decide what constitutes an English law.The Commons procedure committee, chaired by Conservative MP Charles Walker, has also branded the proposals “over-engineered and potentially burdensome”. At the heart of objections is the plan to let John Bercow, the Commons Speaker, decide what constitutes an English law.
The SNP has raised concerns that many pieces of legislation that appear only to relate to England will actually have a huge knock-on effect in Scotland, such as any plans to build a third runway at Heathrow. The SNP has raised concerns that many pieces of legislation that appear only to relate to England will have a huge knock-on effect in Scotland, such as any plans to build a third runway at Heathrow.
Pressed on whether this could be considered English-only legislation, Grayling suggested it could if it was just a planning decision. The measures are an attempt to answer the so-called West Lothian question, which is what to do about the fact that English MPs do not vote on devolved matters affecting the Scottish, such as health and education, but Scottish MPs have a say on those areas in England.Pressed on whether this could be considered English-only legislation, Grayling suggested it could if it was just a planning decision. The measures are an attempt to answer the so-called West Lothian question, which is what to do about the fact that English MPs do not vote on devolved matters affecting the Scottish, such as health and education, but Scottish MPs have a say on those areas in England.
Under the plans, English MPs would be able to block legislation deemed just to affect England, but the bill would still ultimately be subject to a full vote of the House of Commons. Under the plans, English MPs would be able to block legislation deemed just to affect England, but the bill would ultimately be subject to a full vote of the House of Commons.
There is the potential for it to be highly controversial if there were to be an electoral outcome where one party had a majority in the UK overall but not in England. This is most likely in the event of a Labour-SNP alliance with the Tories still holding a majority of English MPs.There is the potential for it to be highly controversial if there were to be an electoral outcome where one party had a majority in the UK overall but not in England. This is most likely in the event of a Labour-SNP alliance with the Tories still holding a majority of English MPs.
The government had to go away and revise its proposals after objections from Tory backbenchers earlier this year. If passed, the plans will be reviewed after a year to make sure they are working properly. The government had to revise its proposals after objections from Tory backbenchers earlier this year. If passed, the plans will be reviewed after a year to make sure they are working properly.