This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/22/court-rejects-manslaughter-conviction-pregnant-woman-crash

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Court rejects manslaughter conviction for pregnant woman who crashed car Court rejects manslaughter conviction for pregnant woman who crashed car
(35 minutes later)
New York state’s highest court on Thursday rejected the manslaughter conviction of a woman who was pregnant when she crashed her car and whose baby was delivered by emergency surgery but died days later.New York state’s highest court on Thursday rejected the manslaughter conviction of a woman who was pregnant when she crashed her car and whose baby was delivered by emergency surgery but died days later.
Prosecutors had argued that Jennifer Jorgensen was speeding, intoxicated and unbelted when she crossed into oncoming traffic in 2008 and hit another vehicle head-on, killing Robert and Mary Kelly. Jorgensen, of Long Island, was eight months pregnant at the time.Prosecutors had argued that Jennifer Jorgensen was speeding, intoxicated and unbelted when she crossed into oncoming traffic in 2008 and hit another vehicle head-on, killing Robert and Mary Kelly. Jorgensen, of Long Island, was eight months pregnant at the time.
Related: Alone in Alabama: dispatches from an inmate jailed for her son’s stillbirthRelated: Alone in Alabama: dispatches from an inmate jailed for her son’s stillbirth
She was acquitted of manslaughter in the deaths of the Kellys but convicted of recklessly causing her daughter’s death.She was acquitted of manslaughter in the deaths of the Kellys but convicted of recklessly causing her daughter’s death.
But the Court of Appeals, in a five-to-one ruling, said the state Legislature didn’t intend to hold a pregnant woman responsible for such harmful conduct to herself or her fetus unless it’s intentional. But the court of appeals, in a five-to-one ruling, said the state legislature did not intend to hold a pregnant woman responsible for such harmful conduct to herself or her fetus unless it was intentional.
Her conviction was under the manslaughter statute for “recklessly” causing the death of another person. Jorgensen had been sentenced to three to nine years in prison, which was stayed pending her appeal. Now it’s dismissed along with the charge. Her conviction was under the manslaughter statute for “recklessly” causing the death of another person. Jorgensen had been sentenced to three to nine years in prison, which was stayed pending her appeal. Now it is dismissed along with the charge.
Any imposition of criminal liability for actions of pregnant women where a child later dies from injuries suffered while in the womb needs to be clearly defined by lawmakers, Judge Eugene Pigott Jr wrote. “It should also not be left to the whim of the prosecutor.”Any imposition of criminal liability for actions of pregnant women where a child later dies from injuries suffered while in the womb needs to be clearly defined by lawmakers, Judge Eugene Pigott Jr wrote. “It should also not be left to the whim of the prosecutor.”
“Conceivably, one could find it ‘reckless’ for a pregnant woman to disregard her obstetrician’s specific orders concerning bed rest; take prescription and/or illicit drugs; shovel a walkway; engage in a contact sport; carry groceries; or disregard dietary restrictions,” Pigott wrote. “Such conduct, if it resulted in premature birth and subsequent death of the child, could result in criminal liability for the mother.”“Conceivably, one could find it ‘reckless’ for a pregnant woman to disregard her obstetrician’s specific orders concerning bed rest; take prescription and/or illicit drugs; shovel a walkway; engage in a contact sport; carry groceries; or disregard dietary restrictions,” Pigott wrote. “Such conduct, if it resulted in premature birth and subsequent death of the child, could result in criminal liability for the mother.”
At present, that’s not in New York’s criminal law, Pigott wrote.At present, that’s not in New York’s criminal law, Pigott wrote.
Jorgensen was relieved by the ruling, said her attorney, Richard Mischel.Jorgensen was relieved by the ruling, said her attorney, Richard Mischel.
“It was a hard struggle for Jennifer,” he said.“It was a hard struggle for Jennifer,” he said.
In a dissent, Judge Eugene Fahy wrote that he could not join in a ruling that analyzes New York statutes to determine that the six-day-old child was not a person because she was unborn when her mother crashed. “The pertinent parts of the Penal Law speak to victims as they are, not as they were at the time the acts giving rise to the crime were committed.”In a dissent, Judge Eugene Fahy wrote that he could not join in a ruling that analyzes New York statutes to determine that the six-day-old child was not a person because she was unborn when her mother crashed. “The pertinent parts of the Penal Law speak to victims as they are, not as they were at the time the acts giving rise to the crime were committed.”
Suffolk County prosecutors argued that the child was a person as defined by the law and the manslaughter statute applied. The district attorney’s office did not immediately reply to queries Thursday. Suffolk County prosecutors argued that the child was a person as defined by the law and the manslaughter statute applied. The district attorney’s office did not immediately reply to queries on Thursday.