This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/24/vatican-synod-gays

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Hope fades that Vatican synod will soften the church’s line on gays and remarriage Vatican synod holds line on gay marriage, but offers hope on communion for divorcees
(about 1 hour later)
After a three-week marathon of Vatican talks on family issues, Roman Catholic bishops voted yesterday on a summary document that is expected to decide whether to overhaul the church’s teaching on gay or remarried Catholics. After a three-week marathon of Vatican talks on family issues, Roman Catholic bishops voted on a summary document which decided against overhauling the church’s teaching on gay Catholics but paved the way for greater openness towards divorcees.
The outcome of the synod of bishops will also be viewed as a judgment on Pope Francis and his push for the clergy to adopt a more pastoral, welcoming approach to those who do not fit into the traditional family model. While bishops have hinted throughout the past week at a need for more open language, the final text is unlikely to be a triumph for the progressives. Pope Francis described the Vatican summit as a way to “open up broader horizons, rising above conspiracy theories and blinkered viewpoints”.
Related: It’s a victory for the status quo but all is not yet lost for Francis “Surely it was not about finding exhaustive solutions for all the difficulties and uncertainties which challenge and threaten the family,” the pontiff said, “but rather about seeing these difficulties and uncertainties in the light of the Faith, carefully studying them and confronting them fearlessly, without burying our heads in the sand.”
At the start of the high-level meeting, there was hope among LGBT groups that bishops could adopt a more open view towards gay Catholics, but it is likely that the church’s teaching will continue to define homosexuality as “intrinsically disordered”. A push for more welcoming language was evident, but the final text was by no means a triumph for progressives. Although bishops agreed that people should be treated with respect “independently of their own sexual tendency”, the reference to gay Catholics was viewed in terms of “accompanying the families in which people with homosexual tendencies live”, rather than accepting same-sex relationships.
Speaking on Saturday, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn said homosexuality had been a theme addressed in the context of “Christian families when there is a gay member”. The bishops also criticised international bodies they said were pushing poor countries to introduce same-sex marriage laws with the promise of aid.
While the cardinal said everyone deserved respect, he also defined the Catholic view as one excluding same-sex families: “The family is made of one man and one woman, their life together, faithful and open to life.” There was, however, a greater openness towards Catholics who divorce and remarry outside the church, who under Vatican teachings are excluded from receiving communion. Bishops agreed divorcees must be “more integrated in Christian communities”.
The fate of Catholics who divorce and remarry outside the church was central to synod discussions, Schönborn said. Some bishops had suggested that the ban on their receiving communion should be lifted, but with conservatives standing firm by church doctrine an inconclusive outcome on the matter is expected. The bishops also paved the way for clergy to decide whether to allow divorcees to participate fully in church life: “It is to be hoped that in the dioceses paths of discernment and involvement of these people will be promoted.”
The difficulty of reaching consensus was hinted at last week by Indian cardinal Oswald Gracias, a member of the committee writing the final report. “The thing is to get a text that will express the concerns of everybody, but will also give a pastoral text that is acceptable to everybody,” he said. The statements on remarried Catholics, however, lacked specificity, reflecting the difficulty of reaching consensus among the bishops, who voted paragraph-by-paragraph on a text that on Friday received 1,355 suggested changes. Despite opposing opinions, many of the 270 participating bishops said there was a greater sense of open dialogue at this synod, coming a year after bishops had first met to discuss family issues.
Bishops voted paragraph by paragraph on the document after 1,355 suggested changes were submitted on Friday. Despite opposing opinions, many bishops said there was a greater sense of open dialogue at this synod, coming a year after bishops had first met to discuss family issues.
Although the clash of conservatives and progressives ran as an undercurrent through this year’s synod, perhaps the greatest challenge was marked by the hugely diverse experiences bishops have of family life. Many described the synod as an education in global family issues, with polygamy, migration and climate change just some of the issues discussed.Although the clash of conservatives and progressives ran as an undercurrent through this year’s synod, perhaps the greatest challenge was marked by the hugely diverse experiences bishops have of family life. Many described the synod as an education in global family issues, with polygamy, migration and climate change just some of the issues discussed.
Regional splits were raised, with African bishops prompted to defend themselves against accusations that they were trying to block progress being peddled by a more “western” view of the world. But geographical borders did not necessarily determine conformity to a certain point of view, with an open division being aired in the media between some US participants at the synod.Regional splits were raised, with African bishops prompted to defend themselves against accusations that they were trying to block progress being peddled by a more “western” view of the world. But geographical borders did not necessarily determine conformity to a certain point of view, with an open division being aired in the media between some US participants at the synod.
Such splits may have played a role in Pope Francis calling for a “healthy decentralisation” of the church and the need for a “conversation of the papacy”.Such splits may have played a role in Pope Francis calling for a “healthy decentralisation” of the church and the need for a “conversation of the papacy”.
The suggestion that bishops could be given greater powers to decide on family issues at a regional level has worried some Catholics, who believe it could lead to a watering down of church doctrine.The suggestion that bishops could be given greater powers to decide on family issues at a regional level has worried some Catholics, who believe it could lead to a watering down of church doctrine.
While bishops will make their collective case through the synod, it will ultimately be left to the pope to decide the next move. Beyond the synod vote, he will face tough opposition in any attempt to change the letter of church teachings, but the upcoming jubilee year of mercy could serve as an opportunity to table new plans for Catholic family life. While bishops have made their collective case, it is up to the pope to decide the next move. Beyond the synod vote, he will face tough opposition in any attempt to change the letter of church teachings, but the upcoming jubilee year of mercy could serve as an opportunity to table new plans for Catholic family life.
Related: It’s a victory for the status quo but all is not yet lost for Francis