This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/nov/10/warning-of-huge-backlog-of-immigration-cases-in-uk

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Warning of huge backlog of immigration cases in UK Warning of huge backlog of immigration cases in UK
(about 4 hours later)
A huge backlog of immigration cases is building up in the UK amid claims that the Home Office and Ministry of Justice are in dispute over who pays for tribunals.A huge backlog of immigration cases is building up in the UK amid claims that the Home Office and Ministry of Justice are in dispute over who pays for tribunals.
According to lawyers representing appellants, the number of hearings at immigration and asylum tribunal centres around the country has almost halved since the election as a money-saving measure. Emergency sittings of immigration tribunals are being organised to tackle the buildup of cases as hearings are being listed 18 months ahead.According to lawyers representing appellants, the number of hearings at immigration and asylum tribunal centres around the country has almost halved since the election as a money-saving measure. Emergency sittings of immigration tribunals are being organised to tackle the buildup of cases as hearings are being listed 18 months ahead.
Other lawyers have described the situation as chaotic, with tribunal hearing rooms left unused and tribunal ushers warned that they could be made redundant. The cutback is alleged to have been due to differences between the Home Office and Ministry of Justice over who should pay. The courts service, a subsidiary of the MoJ, had budgeted for a reduction in the number of sittings.Other lawyers have described the situation as chaotic, with tribunal hearing rooms left unused and tribunal ushers warned that they could be made redundant. The cutback is alleged to have been due to differences between the Home Office and Ministry of Justice over who should pay. The courts service, a subsidiary of the MoJ, had budgeted for a reduction in the number of sittings.
News of the fresh delays emerged as the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman produced a scathing report into the poor handling by the Home Office of immigration claims.
The report said the ombudsman was upholding seven in every 10 complaints it received, with long delays and poor decision-making being the main problems. One teenager had waited nearly a decade for a Home Office decision which cost him employment and education opportunities.
Related: Children in immigration tribunals 'may have to represent themselves'Related: Children in immigration tribunals 'may have to represent themselves'
The backlog of unresolved immigration and asylum cases is notoriously large; it was estimated to have reached 500,000 by the Commons’ home affairs select committee in 2013. Those fighting deportation cases believe it has grown since then.The backlog of unresolved immigration and asylum cases is notoriously large; it was estimated to have reached 500,000 by the Commons’ home affairs select committee in 2013. Those fighting deportation cases believe it has grown since then.
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has confirmed it will organise extra hearings to cope with the problem but denies that there is a dispute between the two departments over funding.HM Courts & Tribunals Service has confirmed it will organise extra hearings to cope with the problem but denies that there is a dispute between the two departments over funding.
However, Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court chambers who specialises in immigration cases, said: “They have cut the number of courts so that those at Hatton Cross and Taylor House [in London] are down to about half of their former level. Some cases are taking 18 months to get listed.”However, Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court chambers who specialises in immigration cases, said: “They have cut the number of courts so that those at Hatton Cross and Taylor House [in London] are down to about half of their former level. Some cases are taking 18 months to get listed.”
Some of those forced to wait are already in immigration detention, which imposes extra costs on other parts of government. There is a suspicion that waiting times are being lengthened to discourage applicants from abroad.Some of those forced to wait are already in immigration detention, which imposes extra costs on other parts of government. There is a suspicion that waiting times are being lengthened to discourage applicants from abroad.
“These delays have an appalling impact on the mental health of those people held in detention centres,” Yeo added. “People are having to wait longer and longer in detention.”“These delays have an appalling impact on the mental health of those people held in detention centres,” Yeo added. “People are having to wait longer and longer in detention.”
The delays are causing particular hardship to separated families where the Home Office has made an incorrect decision: the appeal success rate in such cases is 40%. Mistakes in rulings are common.The delays are causing particular hardship to separated families where the Home Office has made an incorrect decision: the appeal success rate in such cases is 40%. Mistakes in rulings are common.
To cope with the delays, the first tier tribunal immigration and asylum chamber has circulated a note detailing priorities for listing cases.To cope with the delays, the first tier tribunal immigration and asylum chamber has circulated a note detailing priorities for listing cases.
They should be in the following order: detained appellants, deprivation of citizenship cases, appeals involving children, asylum appeals and other appeals.They should be in the following order: detained appellants, deprivation of citizenship cases, appeals involving children, asylum appeals and other appeals.
Last week the Labour MP Meg Hillier, complained at justice questions in the Commons about the “unreasonable waits” for constituents, including one case already listed for next May.Last week the Labour MP Meg Hillier, complained at justice questions in the Commons about the “unreasonable waits” for constituents, including one case already listed for next May.
The justice minister, Shailesh Vara, told her: “As a consequence of the Immigration Act 2014, we anticipate the number of appeals going down. We are keeping an eye on the numbers and at the moment we do not see a particular concern, but if there is one, we will make sure that there are more sittings.”The justice minister, Shailesh Vara, told her: “As a consequence of the Immigration Act 2014, we anticipate the number of appeals going down. We are keeping an eye on the numbers and at the moment we do not see a particular concern, but if there is one, we will make sure that there are more sittings.”
Three days later an HM Courts & Tribunals Service spokesperson said: “Immigration and asylum appeals are currently being heard within eight months on average. Significant delays only arise when cases are very complicated. To maintain current performance levels we are putting in additional sitting days for judges from next month.Three days later an HM Courts & Tribunals Service spokesperson said: “Immigration and asylum appeals are currently being heard within eight months on average. Significant delays only arise when cases are very complicated. To maintain current performance levels we are putting in additional sitting days for judges from next month.
“It is nonsense to suggest we are in dispute with the Home Office and we continue to work closely with them on reforms to the immigration system.”“It is nonsense to suggest we are in dispute with the Home Office and we continue to work closely with them on reforms to the immigration system.”
Both the Home Office and the MoJ referred questions to HMCTS and declined to respond directly.Both the Home Office and the MoJ referred questions to HMCTS and declined to respond directly.