This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/04/gun-violence-epidemic-shooting-deaths-public-health-policy

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Gun violence is an epidemic. It is time for a public health response Gun violence is an epidemic. It is time for a public health response
(about 2 hours later)
To reverse the gun violence epidemic — and it’s important that we use the word “epidemic” — we need to do the same thing we’d do for any infectious disease outbreak. We should track it, find the root causes, use science to find research gaps, create policy solutions and use mass public education campaigns to eradicate the threat.Each year we lose over 30,000 people from firearm-related violence. Wednesday’s mass shooting in San Bernardino County, California struck especially close to home with me and my colleagues at the American Public Health Association. The county’s health department had its holiday party interrupted by gunfire that killed at least 14 people, injured at least 21 more and emotionally harmed countless families in the community. Yet, this tragedy is not an outlier. So far this year, we have seen more than 350 mass shootings in the US and it happens almost every day.But what’s even more heartbreaking is that gun violence is preventable. To reverse the gun violence epidemic – and it’s important that we use the word “epidemic” – we need to do the same thing we’d do for any infectious disease outbreak. We should track it, find the root causes, use science to find research gaps, create policy solutions and use mass public education campaigns to eradicate the threat.
When the Ebola virus reached the US last year, the public health community sprung into action to address it. We had an evidence base for the disease because we had studied it. Ebola was tracked, prevention measures put in place, gaps in knowledge were assessed and the White House appointed an “Ebola czar” to coordinate our national response. Every health department in the US was put on alert. This was for just a handful of cases. Each year we lose over 30,000 people from firearm-related violence. Wednesday’s mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, struck especially close to home with me and my colleagues at the American Public Health Association. The county’s health department had its holiday party interrupted by gunfire that killed at least 14 people, injured at least 21 more and emotionally harmed countless families in the community. Yet, this tragedy is not an outlier. So far this year, we have seen more than 350 mass shootings in the US and it happens almost every day.
I can only imagine how many lives would be saved if we treated gun violence the same way.The way to do this would be to start with the things you know will work. Congress has the power to start making the numbers go down right now with some common-sense steps. It should establish universal background checks for all gun purchases, including at gun shows and on the internet, to ensure people who should not have access to firearms don’t, for example. Right now, the policies we have don’t stop bad-apple gun dealers from putting their weapons in the hands of people who are motivated to cause death and injury – often to themselves. But what’s even more heartbreaking is that gun violence is preventable.
When the Ebola virus reached the US last year, the public health community leapt into action to address it. We had an evidence base for the disease because we had studied it. Ebola was tracked, prevention measures put in place, gaps in knowledge were assessed and the White House appointed an “Ebola czar” to coordinate our national response. Every health department in the US was put on alert. This was for just a handful of cases.
I can only imagine how many lives would be saved if we treated gun violence the same way.
The way to do this would be to start with the things you know will work. Congress has the power to start making the numbers go down right now with some common-sense steps. It should establish universal background checks for all gun purchases, including at gun shows and on the internet, to ensure people who should not have access to firearms don’t, for example. Right now, the policies we have don’t stop bad-apple gun dealers from putting their weapons in the hands of people who are motivated to cause death and injury – often to themselves.
Related: Gun control is political. So is refusing to address the politics of gun violence | Scott LemieuxRelated: Gun control is political. So is refusing to address the politics of gun violence | Scott Lemieux
Congress should also allow federal funding for research and prevention strategies to close the gap in knowledge surrounding gun violence and ensure our national and local data systems are in place, adequately resourced and working to collect and analyze injury-related data from firearm related violence.There has been an effective ban on federal funding related to gun violence prevention research since 1996, when Congress put language in its Appropriations Bill stipulating: “None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control”. This hamstrings our national health protectors, CDC and the National Institutes of Health, from getting the science necessary to make headway. We have seen members of Congress recently step up to try to lift the ban, but we’ve already lost 20 years of life-saving research. Congress should also allow federal funding for research and prevention strategies to close the gap in knowledge surrounding gun violence and ensure our national and local data systems are in place, adequately resourced and working to collect and analyze injury-related data from firearm related violence.
There has been an effective ban on federal funding related to gun violence prevention research since 1996, when Congress put language in its Appropriations Bill stipulating: “None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” This hamstrings our national health protectors, CDC and the National Institutes of Health, from getting the science necessary to make headway. We have seen members of Congress recently step up to try to lift the ban, but we’ve already lost 20 years of life-saving research.
We’re not debating the constitutionality of guns. What we want to do is work to make people safer with firearms, the firearms themselves safer and our society safer with firearms in the environment.We’re not debating the constitutionality of guns. What we want to do is work to make people safer with firearms, the firearms themselves safer and our society safer with firearms in the environment.
Related: We should not rationalize the tragedy of San Bernardino but we will. Again | Jeb LundRelated: We should not rationalize the tragedy of San Bernardino but we will. Again | Jeb Lund
Look at what we’ve done to make auto crashes less deadly. In just a decade we cut US highway deaths by 25% – down to a historic low – not by blaming the victims, but by making people safer in their cars, the vehicles themselves safer and the roads and environment safer for cars and people to transit on them.Time and again a public health approach to solving health threats is a proven, evidence-based approach to improving health and preventing injury. That approach looks upstream to prevent bad things from happening downstream, and then doing everything possible to prevent them.Health epidemics don’t end unless we intervene taking the best science about what does and does not work and using it. The epidemic of intentional gun violence can be reversed with a science-based approach. It happened with Ebola, it worked for automobile crashes and it can absolutely reduce gun violence. Look at what we’ve done to make auto crashes less deadly. In just a decade we cut US highway deaths by 25% – down to a historic low – not by blaming the victims, but by making people safer in their cars, the vehicles themselves safer and the roads and environment safer for cars and people to transit on them.
Time and again a public health approach to solving health threats is a proven, evidence-based approach to improving health and preventing injury. That approach looks upstream to prevent bad things from happening downstream, and then doing everything possible to prevent them.
Health epidemics don’t end unless we intervene taking the best science about what does and does not work and using it. The epidemic of intentional gun violence can be reversed with a science-based approach. It happened with Ebola, it worked for automobile crashes and it can absolutely reduce gun violence.