This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-35064535

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Shauna Hoare to appeal over Becky Watts manslaughter verdict Shauna Hoare to appeal over Becky Watts manslaughter verdict
(34 minutes later)
One of the couple convicted of killing Becky Watts has said she will appeal against her conviction and sentence.One of the couple convicted of killing Becky Watts has said she will appeal against her conviction and sentence.
Shauna Hoare, 21, was convicted of Becky's manslaughter and jailed for 17 years at Bristol Crown Court. She has applied for leave to appeal.Shauna Hoare, 21, was convicted of Becky's manslaughter and jailed for 17 years at Bristol Crown Court. She has applied for leave to appeal.
Her boyfriend, Nathan Matthews, was convicted of his step-sister's murder.Her boyfriend, Nathan Matthews, was convicted of his step-sister's murder.
Matthews, 28, suffocated the teenager at her home in the St George area of Bristol on 19 February while trying to kidnap her.Matthews, 28, suffocated the teenager at her home in the St George area of Bristol on 19 February while trying to kidnap her.
Hoare, 21, who was pregnant at the time, was at the address.Hoare, 21, who was pregnant at the time, was at the address.
Her body was then dismembered and hidden in a shed while a huge manhunt in Bristol attempted to track down the 16-year-old.Her body was then dismembered and hidden in a shed while a huge manhunt in Bristol attempted to track down the 16-year-old.
A jury took less than four hours to convict the pair of her killing.
Hoare was convicted of manslaughter because she had participated in a kidnap where any "sober and reasonable person" would have known some harm would come to Becky.Hoare was convicted of manslaughter because she had participated in a kidnap where any "sober and reasonable person" would have known some harm would come to Becky.
Judge Mr Justice Dingemans said both Matthews and Hoare had given "obviously dishonest" accounts of what happened to the jury.Judge Mr Justice Dingemans said both Matthews and Hoare had given "obviously dishonest" accounts of what happened to the jury.
Matthews had claimed he was trying to scare Becky into changing what he believed was poor behaviour while Hoare said she knew nothing about any of it.Matthews had claimed he was trying to scare Becky into changing what he believed was poor behaviour while Hoare said she knew nothing about any of it.
"The evidence proves, and I am sure, that Nathan Matthews had developed a fixation with having sex with petite teenage girls and Shauna Hoare had been persuaded to participate in this fixation," said the judge."The evidence proves, and I am sure, that Nathan Matthews had developed a fixation with having sex with petite teenage girls and Shauna Hoare had been persuaded to participate in this fixation," said the judge.
Judge Dingemans added during sentencing that he was sure the planned kidnap "was for a sexual purpose".Judge Dingemans added during sentencing that he was sure the planned kidnap "was for a sexual purpose".