This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/10/heathrow-third-runway-decision-airport-expansion

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Decision on Heathrow third runway put off until at least summer 2016 Decision on Heathrow third runway put off until at least summer 2016
(35 minutes later)
A final decision on whether to build a new runway at Heathrow airport has been put off until summer 2016 at the earliest “subject to further consideration on environmental impacts and the best possible mitigation measures”, the government has said. David Cameron has delayed the decision on whether to allow a third runway at Heathrow airport until summer 2016 over environmental concerns.
The transport secretary, Patrick McLoughlin, said the government would “continue work on all the shortlisted locations, so that the timetable for more capacity set out by Sir Howard [Davies] is met”. The government said it was supporting more airport capacity in the south-east by 2030, as recommended by the Airports Commission.
More details soon … However, it delivered a setback to Heathrow’s hopes of building a third runway by neglecting to mention the airport by name in its statement and making clear other viable options – such as expansion at Gatwick – are still on the table.
Although the delay was widely expected, Cameron immediately faced fury from business groups and accusations from Labour that he has ducked a difficult decision on infrastructure to help the chances of Zac Goldsmith, the Tory London mayoral candidate, who is a fierce opponent of Heathrow expansion.
The British Chamber of Commerce said it was “gutless”, while the CBI group for big business called the decision “deeply disappointing”.
Sadiq Khan, the Labour London mayoral candidate, said the Tories were “kicking the decision into the long grass to avoid embarrassing” Goldsmith.
The prime minister had previously indicated there would be a final decision before the end of this year, when the Airports Commission led by Howard Davies recommended a third runway at Heathrow.
But more recently, the Commons environmental audit committee produced a parliamentary report saying final approval should not be granted until the airport demonstrated that it could meet key environmental conditions on climate change, air quality and noise. It warned that a failure to deal with environmental concerns could lay the scheme open to legal challenge.
The new statement from the government, released after a meeting of the airports sub-committee, stressed the need for further environmental work, including testing the Airport Commission’s air quality analysis using the latest projected future concentrations of nitrogen dioxide.
Those present at the meeting included Cameron; the chancellor, George Osborne; the transport secretary, Patrick McLoughlin; the environment secretary, Liz Truss; the chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, Oliver Letwin; the communities secretary, Greg Clark; and the chief whip, Mark Harper.
A statement from the Department for Transport said the “location decision” for extra airport capacity would be “subject to further consideration on environmental impacts and the best possible mitigation measures”. It said the government agrees with the Airports Commission that the south-east needs more runway capacity by 2030 and agrees with its shortlist of options, which kept Gatwick open as a viable possibility.
McLoughlin said: “The case for aviation expansion is clear – but it’s vitally important we get the decision right so that it will benefit generations to come. We will undertake more work on environmental impacts, including air quality, noise and carbon.
“We must develop the best possible package of measures to mitigate the impacts on local people. We will continue work on all the shortlisted locations, so that the timetable for more capacity set out by Sir Howard is met.
“At the first opportunity I will make a statement to the house to make clear our plans.”
Among the first to respond was Rob Gray, campaign director of the Back Heathrow group, who condemned Cameron’s “dithering and delaying”.
“The government has created more uncertainty for local residents, more uncertainty for workers in the local area and the potential loss to the UK economy of more than £5bn,” he said.
“There is massive support for Heathrow expansion: from across all political parties, the majority of UK businesses, international airlines, local firms and most importantly, from local residents.
“It’s time for the government to get off the fence, commit to Heathrow expansion and seize this golden opportunity to grow the economies of west London, the Thames valley and the UK as a whole.”
John Longworth, director general at the British Chambers of Commerce, said businesses would see it as a “gutless move by a government that promised a clear decision on a new runway by the end of the year”.
“Business will question whether ministers are delaying critical upgrades to our national infrastructure for legitimate reasons, or to satisfy short-term political interests.”
Terry Scuoler, chief executive of EEF, the manufacturers’ organisation, added: “By avoiding a tough decision, despite a well-evidenced shortlist, the government has again dithered and avoided the issue. Industry is fed up and dismayed by the continued excuses and political dilly dallying.”
Meanwhile, Carolyn Fairbairn, CBI director general said delaying the decision “on an issue of critical importance to the future prosperity of the UK is deeply disappointing”.
“We urgently need to increase our runway capacity to spur trade growth, investment and job creation. Just eight new routes to emerging markets could boost our exports by up to £1bn a year,” she said.
“But by 2025 – the earliest a new runway would be built – London’s airports could already be operating at full capacity and the longer we wait the further we fall behind the likes of Amsterdam and Paris. If we don’t have a new runway up and running by 2030 the cost to the UK will be as much as £5.3bn a year in lost trade to the Brics [Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa] alone.
Khan said the country “could not afford more dithering over aviation capacity”.
“Businesses desperately need more airport capacity around London, and the Tories are letting them down. Gatwick stands ready to deliver it sooner, at a lower public expense and without the damaging impact of Heathrow expansion,” he said.
“We already know Heathrow can’t be the solution. The additional damage from air and noise pollution would mean more years of delay, while protracted legal battles are fought. It must be Gatwick – and we need to get on with it.”