This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-35112169
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Brighton and Hove beach smoking ban bid dropped | Brighton and Hove beach smoking ban bid dropped |
(about 3 hours later) | |
A plan to ban smoking on Brighton beach has been dropped but the council will move forward with bringing in smoke-free zones at primary school gates. | A plan to ban smoking on Brighton beach has been dropped but the council will move forward with bringing in smoke-free zones at primary school gates. |
Brighton council's health and wellbeing board looked at plans for smoke-free spaces in outdoor areas on Tuesday. | Brighton council's health and wellbeing board looked at plans for smoke-free spaces in outdoor areas on Tuesday. |
Members heard the proposed beach ban had won little support from smokers and non-smokers alike. | Members heard the proposed beach ban had won little support from smokers and non-smokers alike. |
Smokers' campaign group Forest welcomed the move and said it would have been "a step too far". | Smokers' campaign group Forest welcomed the move and said it would have been "a step too far". |
A report submitted to the meeting said smoking was higher than average in the city - 23% of adults smoke compared with 18% nationally and 15% of 15-year-olds smoke compared with 8% nationally. | A report submitted to the meeting said smoking was higher than average in the city - 23% of adults smoke compared with 18% nationally and 15% of 15-year-olds smoke compared with 8% nationally. |
The Labour-run council wanted to support Public Health England's aim of having a smoke-free generation by 2025. | The Labour-run council wanted to support Public Health England's aim of having a smoke-free generation by 2025. |
'No health risk' | 'No health risk' |
A consultation on smoke-free zones had 1,898 responses - said to be among the highest response rates. | A consultation on smoke-free zones had 1,898 responses - said to be among the highest response rates. |
It found while there was little support for smoke-free parks and beaches, a majority of smokers and non-smokers agreed play parks, school entrances and children's centres should be smoke-free. | It found while there was little support for smoke-free parks and beaches, a majority of smokers and non-smokers agreed play parks, school entrances and children's centres should be smoke-free. |
Members decided to continue with a bid to promote smoke-free school gates and play parks, and smoke-free outdoor areas at restaurants and pubs, but dropped plans to encourage smoke-free parks and beaches. | Members decided to continue with a bid to promote smoke-free school gates and play parks, and smoke-free outdoor areas at restaurants and pubs, but dropped plans to encourage smoke-free parks and beaches. |
Forest director Simon Clark said there was no justification for banning smoking in the open air. | Forest director Simon Clark said there was no justification for banning smoking in the open air. |
He claimed there was no risk to anyone else's health and the inconvenience to non-smokers was minimal or non-existent. | He claimed there was no risk to anyone else's health and the inconvenience to non-smokers was minimal or non-existent. |
"Banning smoking in outdoor public spaces is not only a step too far, it's also very unpopular with the general public," he added. | "Banning smoking in outdoor public spaces is not only a step too far, it's also very unpopular with the general public," he added. |
Councillor Daniel Yates, committee chairman, said: "I believe the measures that are being suggested are a common-sense approach." |
Previous version
1
Next version